Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't figure out why the usual keyboard warriors have not mentioned this matter yet. No anguish and not even "I told you so"


Is there any difference between (a) UK bivalves not meeting new EU regulations and (b) French fishing vessels not complying with the regulation on having tracking equipment?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/283940-jersey-blockade/
Share on other sites

Regarding (a), they are not NEW EU regulations. They applied to third countries prior to Brexit. The way it has been reported here by most of the media suggests the EU just made them up to spite the UK.


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/02/eu-rules-on-some-types-of-shellfish-leave-uk-fishermen-devastated

As Alan said, we knew ahead of time what the rules on shellfish are. Certain sections of the media chose to present this as the EU being difficult. That was a lie by the media.


The situation in Jersey is different; here it would seem this is one of those post-Brexit things that needs to be worked out.


I?m sure the sending of ?gunboats? and the timing of the elections is entirely coincidental.

Two French navy vessels have joined two from the British Royal Navy that were dispatched to the self-governing Channel Island of Jersey, where about eighty French boats have held a protest over their access to fishing grounds. A French government minister, Clement Beaune, said France would not be intimidated by the presence of the Royal Navy. A statement issued by the European Commission says that restrictions on French fishing boats should be lifted because Britain has not adhered to post-Brexit fishing provisions. The dispute escalated after a French minister warned that the electricity supply to Jersey might be cut off.


Pretty fair and balanced and - importantly - full of facts from BBC World Service

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Regarding (a), they are not NEW EU regulations.

> They applied to third countries prior to Brexit.

> The way it has been reported here by most of the

> media suggests the EU just made them up to spite

> the UK.

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/02/e

> u-rules-on-some-types-of-shellfish-leave-uk-fisher

> men-devastated


More than that, Farage was on the EU fisheries committee that put those new rules in place back in 2004. The only problem is that he never turned up to most of those committee meetings. Still happy to retire on his EU pension though, while fishermen literally go to the wall. He never cared then, and he doesn't care now.

j.a. Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As Alan said, we knew ahead of time what the rules

> on shellfish are. Certain sections of the media

> chose to present this as the EU being difficult.

> That was a lie by the media.

>

> The situation in Jersey is different; here it

> would seem this is one of those post-Brexit things

> that needs to be worked out.

>

> I?m sure the sending of ?gunboats? and the timing

> of the elections is entirely coincidental.


Exactly that. Government has essentially said it is for Jersey to decide their rules, so a bit of negotiation is perhaps all that is needed. Fishing was always a stupid thing to push to the fore. Fish swim where they want and all sides need free movement of catch and exports.

The Jersey govt have basically now admitted that they incorrectly applied the licensing versus what is outlined in the TCA....


Fisherman protested against the jersey. Jersey have acknowledged their misunderstanding/mis-execution, and agreed that they will work it out. End of storm in teacup.


Both the French and the British didn't help matters, and neither should have got involved. Nothing to see here.

I heard that the Italians have already surrendered.


Sorry, I hate these crass stereotypes. I went to an interesting talk about WW1 once that talked about how well the French fought. Rather than this stereotype of WWII - and we choose to forget how important the French were in helping get the troops back from Dunkurque/Dunkirk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...