Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anybody had multi-focal lenses inserted following cataracts?


If so, what pros and cons did you find, were they vastly expensive, did you still have to wear glasses for some things, and would they have to be replaced at some point?


I'm very short sighted and presently have varifocal glasses and multi-focal daily contact lenses for occasional wear, but I'm getting cataracts and beginning to look at options.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/282395-cataracts-multi-focal-lenses/
Share on other sites

?8k?


I'll probably stick to the NHS option then!!!


But I don't see why it would be any more scary than any cataract op, it would just be inserting different lenses?


If you don't have it done at all, you would gradually not be able to see at all, and for me at least that would be a lot scarier!

I have just had my first Cataract Op. 12th April.


I had it done st St. Thomas'


It took 24 minutes.


I went for Distant Lens (0) which means I will need Reading glasses for close up

Need to wait for other eye to be done before I can get Prescription Reading glasses'


Very awkward at the moment using PC and Iphone.


Have to put Eye Drops in for 1 month.. 4 times a day. 2 lots for the first week,


My distant vision is Brilliant and I can see the TV well without any glasses..


Better than that I can read the Whateley Road sign opposite the end of my road from outside my house.


Most people opt for a Distant lens implant.


Foxy

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My friend can read the bottom line on a vision

> chart, and his iPhone at normal settings



That's very good!


I'm slightly concerned because at present, being shortsighted, I can read better without my varfifocal glasses than I can with them, but when I get my cataracts sorted that won't be the case.


I don't want to have one eye for reading and one for distance, because I tried that with contact lenses and I couldn't get on with it at all.


Interested in your experience, Foxy, thanks, but I read a lot more than I watch TV (in fact I no longer have a TV) so the idea of constantly having to find my reading glasses (or going around with them hanging round my neck) doesn't particularly appeal :))


I suspect there will always be a compromise, short of shelling out eight grand ......

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone who Drives will need Distant lenses or

> glasses.

>



Yes, but whatever you are starting with you can get glasses to correct it if necessary for particular situations - driving, reading or computer :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...