Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have to say I would count the Black Cherry as my favourtie place to go out on Lordship Lane as I love a well-made cocktail.. (& partly due to the fact it holds some very pleasant memories there!) and I would certainly be very upset to see it close... but like Keef I'd like to hear from the owners exactly what the problems are before writing petitions etc...

Also would like to say a Here Here on Mikese22 post about suggestions......!

Me too Katy. As you can see there are some right miserable bastards on this Forum. I like the Black Cherry although I haven't been in there for a few months. I do like their cocktails. It would be great if they could use the outside space at the back but it sounds to me like they are going to build an extension. Perhaps Angela could clarify?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Me too Katy. As you can see there are some right

> miserable bastards on this Forum. I like the Black

> Cherry although I haven't been in there for a few

> months. I do like their cocktails. It would be

> great if they could use the outside space at the

> back but it sounds to me like they are going to

> build an extension. Perhaps Angela could clarify?


haha took the words right out of my mouth Mr Lush (or Ms?). There are def a few Victor Meldrews on here. I for one would be upset if Cherry were to close. Where else can you get a Zombie cocktail?!

katy - you seem to have an interest in council planning appeals - a hobby of yours ? I see your first ever post was asking what the decison was on the on the neros situation a while ago.


a curiously obtuse first post some might ask.


some might also say that the the formal Black Cherry disclaimer notice serves more to arouse suspicions than to dampen it.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> scor46 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Snorky you definitely are Columbo...

>

>

> or on crack you're so paranoid. You're not the

> guy asking people for money on Grove Vale are

> you?!



Funny... Some people just happen to care Snorky...

lets pretend we are in court



in a criminal court, if I presented the a sequence of coincidences I have hightlighted earlier, The case would quite rightly be dismissed by the judge based on the maxim of beyond reasonable doubt


if however this was a civil case and based on balance of probability rule , then the outcome would likely be very different

Snorkdude,


calm it down buddy, this is a genuine cause and the people are who they say they are and they are not connected to phill props. The neighbours should understand that if the extention gets built then there will be no noise from garden drinking as the extension will be part of the main bar/building and noise will not be heard. Am i right BC?

Personally I can't help feeling sorry for the neighbours who are complaining about the potential noise of any change in usage.


They no doubt have homes and families and don't want their current living standards to be detrimentally affected by a change in a business's usage.


Bars are not the be-all and end-all of an area, the people who live here are though.

I know a group of guys who are fond of a small charity, financially supports its entire running costs.


Similarly the punters, who like BC so much and wants to support it, should visit it more often and just pay double the amount on their bill. That way the BC will have extra income with same number of punters without building the extension and it can continue in business. And everyone lives happily ever after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 29 points...   Week 29 table...  
    • Cd collections wanted.. bigger the better Cash awaits dm me if you have something that may interest thanks Tim   
    • Hi everyone, we are trying to finslise our decision for enrolling our son for 3+ from September and currently considering Dulwich Prep or Herne Hill. We like both and appreciate there is no right or wrong answer but what we like about HH is great focus on early years and also being coed. However if we can avoid the 7+ stress then prefer to do that. Dulwich Prep is closer but the difference is not significant. we know children are very active and busy in DP and they have great facilities, but unlike HH, we don’t know much about their focus on personal development and emotional intelligence, etc! Also not sure about long-term impact of being in boys only school. Difficult decision for us and we appreciate feedback from parents if you can share please.    thank you
    • Yeah that was their old policy. Their new policy is to force you to have a water meter and if you refuse they put you on a punitively high tariff which effectively forces you to have one. I was doing well with my policy of polite resistance which was to say yes fine I'll have one fitted but then not actually book an appointment or cancel the appointments they made. But then I was persuaded that it would be much cheaper anyway. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...