Jump to content

Padded Cell - screech and scream to your hearts content *contains rudeness*


Recommended Posts

I'm with Annaj. When I posted this before:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,83798,84023#msg-84023


Sean posted me a wee clip off youtube to try and persuade me. I was unmoved I'm afraid.


PS - Bleurgh!

He may well be all of the above, though as I'm perhaps of the 'shirt buttons on the right' gender and at least heterosexual in intent his appeal may be lost on me.


But funny? As the proverbial bastard burning orphanage from what I've seen.

Ok, ok. I have to admit I have never seen or read an interview with him, so I'm willing to concede that he may have some redeeming personality features.

But sexy? No, sorry, defnitely not. I just couldn't sleep with a man who weighs less than me!

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember the days when men, were men, and women

> liked them for it;-)



hear hear Steve T - Those beanpole guys like Russell Brand in their skinny jeans make me heave! And what's with his eyeliner?! Russell Brand Vs Russell Crowe? No contest - give me that rugged and brawny Aussie God any day..


and don't get me started on the vermin that is Pete Doherty...

Mightyroar wrote: when was that again?


Seems like a life time ago, but I still hanker after it. When women were soft, gentle, and feminine........


Men were butch brauny beefcakes that could do any job around the place, and would come home from the pub scoff his supper drop his wages into her lap and give her a good seeing to before breakfast.


It was all much simpler in those days...........

How true, Steve.

I think things started to go downhill when it became less acceptable to beat your wife if they had the gall to ask for more than their agreed 'pin money'.


They should never have been given the right to vote. Give 'em and inch..

I absolutely hate televisions in public waiting rooms. Twice in the last week I've been forced to endure "Jerry Springer" and "Trisha". It's impossible to concentrate on my book on Scrabble tactics with that drivel in the background.


Could they not at least tune it to the OU?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
    • Rather than have a go at Southwark,  contact them, they will employ at least one arborist who will know far more than most people on this site. Here's one: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaun-murphy-morris-03b7b665/?originalSubdomain=uk
    • I would look in the surrounding area as once they realise it has nothing they could sell or of obvious monatary value in it they'll dump the bag and contents.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...