Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

I was looking into this a year or so ago but then life took over... has anyone in SE22 had or know anyone who has had a loft extension on a London (butterfly) roof?

I am aware there can be issues with planning permission but conversions with this type of roof are apparently now much more common so ideally want to know if it's been done, who used, how long and how much.


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28023-loft-extensions/
Share on other sites

Never heard of a butterfly roof, so Googled it. Tell us more about your wants and desires.


Most loft extensions round my way (1930s) are ugly, with owners maximising their space. There are even ones in semi's done at similar times and probably by the same company (Econolofts) where they have used different designs for what looks like the same outcome.


From my understanding loft extensions are done

(a) because they are cheaper than other extensions

(b) easier planning (mind you this lot would happily pave over paradise and put up a parking lot)

© because there isn't no room for another extension.


Anyway I've digressed and probably upset half of the readership.


Tell us more about your situation.

H, there are some houses with what could be called a butterfly roof on Crystal Palace road (and probably elsewhere). I've mostly seen them on "natural" 3 storey houses in the area. Do a search on Southwark's planning portal to see if one had been done on your street.



You'd be better off speaking to a builder who can give you a very rough quote but typically the cost to do a loft conversion on a roof that's not suitable for conversion (for whatever reason) is the standard costs of the conversion + the costs of an entirely new roof. If you'd be allowed to do this is another question. Most likely if there was precedent as I am sure you are aware.


Might'n it be easier to do an loft extension over the outrigger if there is sufficient height with a dormer to install the stairs?

I am quite certain that you wouldn't be allowed to build above the height of the existing roof.


You might be able to fill in the centre dip of the "V", and then lower the ceiling of the top floor to create enough height. But it wouldn't fall under permitted development, and I'm not sure how likely it would be to get approval.

What Jeremy said, if it can't be done under Permitted Development, then highly unlikely that the planners would pass such a proposal.

I don't think it's a coincidence that a road like Nutfield Road, from memory, hasn't got any precedent.

Personally I think it would destroy the streetscape...


http://images.zoopla.co.uk/fe938c4d7eb1232d35da9085e475a747e42e4598_645_430.jpg

I'm sorry to say that Southwark are fairly prohibitive about this. I know from direct experience of trying (and failing) to get permission to convert our butterfly roof into habitable space. All of our neighbours offered supporting letters for the plan but the planner still said "no", citing borough policy.


Check out page 28 and onwards in their planning policy document:

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/4358/part_2_pages_79-156

appers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All of our neighbours offered

> supporting letters for the plan but the planner

> still said "no", citing borough policy.


Letters of support from neighbours carry little weight, afterall, in 5-10 years they may well have moved house.

Planners are dispassionate and will take the long term view of what's best for the area in accordance wuth their policy...

  • 2 weeks later...
Loft conversions on old terraces can have a massive impact on your neighbour's light. Most people get a loft conversion for the extra room and the lovely light, airy feel. It seems slightly ironic that in gaining your light space you may be taking from your neighbours.
  • 2 weeks later...

I've been thinking about this as well VickiO. Extending a pitch V to a habitable space I've also seen referred to as getting a mansard roof. There are actually 2 houses on Nutfield that have them. One's more discreet than the other but I've not noticed them before I started out to look which must say something as I do tend to look around when I'm out and about.


Good luck with your searches. Would be great if you let us know how the planning process goes. Lots of recent refusals for mansards on the southwark planning website which is disheartening but there is definitely precedent all over. One can only hope the right discreet respectful design would pass muster. Several of the refusals I read had not been in pre planning discussion.

  • 2 months later...

Hi Mrs Teamtime


Yes I have seen the Nutfield loft extensions also but very disheartening to know lots of refusals from Southwark. I think they are one of the most discreet type of loft extensions


It's still only a pipedream at this stage but i'd love to know if you take it further. I thought nobody had replied to the message hence only picking all these up now


Thanks!

Hi Malumbu

Sorry for delay on this -had no notifications anyone replied! The London roof is in a V so you can build into your existing loft space and up to the exisiting height of outside side brick work. Not imposing from the front or the back and no neighbourly light issues too.

Still researching, getting ideas and quotes, seems to be about the ?40k mark which is a lot but still cheaper than moving to a 2 bed in ED!

BUTTERFLY ROOFS

In some terraces the historic butterfly roof pattern survives unaltered.

In such cases, roof extensions will normally be unacceptable.

However, if the terrace has been altered and includes other roof extensions, a mansard extension may be acceptable but the "V" shaped parapet wall should be retained.

Gap between two terraces.

Mansard with butterfly parapet retained at rear. http://www3.westminster.gov.uk/spgs/publications/Roof%20guide.pdf p21

  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...
Hey all, this is a really interesting thread. We've got a proposal in with planning at the moment to convert our butterfly roof. Following pre-planning advice (where they said it basically wouldn't ever happen because of the v, being in an unbroken line of butterfly roofs and seeing the structure from the street) we went back to the drawing board. We now have a proposal that can't be seen from the street, doesn't rise above parapet, doesn't destroy the v and isn't too big. Because various dormers have been put on the back of some of the houses, the look has already been spoilt. Now the only sticking point is the existing roof structure. We've been told if we can show some examples of successful conversions - especially in rows of London roofs, we MIGHT be in with a chance. Possibly. Does anyone know of anyone who has had success? I'll look at the suggested Nutfield road, choumert road and crystal palace road, thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...