Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

I was looking into this a year or so ago but then life took over... has anyone in SE22 had or know anyone who has had a loft extension on a London (butterfly) roof?

I am aware there can be issues with planning permission but conversions with this type of roof are apparently now much more common so ideally want to know if it's been done, who used, how long and how much.


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28023-loft-extensions/
Share on other sites

Never heard of a butterfly roof, so Googled it. Tell us more about your wants and desires.


Most loft extensions round my way (1930s) are ugly, with owners maximising their space. There are even ones in semi's done at similar times and probably by the same company (Econolofts) where they have used different designs for what looks like the same outcome.


From my understanding loft extensions are done

(a) because they are cheaper than other extensions

(b) easier planning (mind you this lot would happily pave over paradise and put up a parking lot)

© because there isn't no room for another extension.


Anyway I've digressed and probably upset half of the readership.


Tell us more about your situation.

H, there are some houses with what could be called a butterfly roof on Crystal Palace road (and probably elsewhere). I've mostly seen them on "natural" 3 storey houses in the area. Do a search on Southwark's planning portal to see if one had been done on your street.



You'd be better off speaking to a builder who can give you a very rough quote but typically the cost to do a loft conversion on a roof that's not suitable for conversion (for whatever reason) is the standard costs of the conversion + the costs of an entirely new roof. If you'd be allowed to do this is another question. Most likely if there was precedent as I am sure you are aware.


Might'n it be easier to do an loft extension over the outrigger if there is sufficient height with a dormer to install the stairs?

I am quite certain that you wouldn't be allowed to build above the height of the existing roof.


You might be able to fill in the centre dip of the "V", and then lower the ceiling of the top floor to create enough height. But it wouldn't fall under permitted development, and I'm not sure how likely it would be to get approval.

What Jeremy said, if it can't be done under Permitted Development, then highly unlikely that the planners would pass such a proposal.

I don't think it's a coincidence that a road like Nutfield Road, from memory, hasn't got any precedent.

Personally I think it would destroy the streetscape...


http://images.zoopla.co.uk/fe938c4d7eb1232d35da9085e475a747e42e4598_645_430.jpg

I'm sorry to say that Southwark are fairly prohibitive about this. I know from direct experience of trying (and failing) to get permission to convert our butterfly roof into habitable space. All of our neighbours offered supporting letters for the plan but the planner still said "no", citing borough policy.


Check out page 28 and onwards in their planning policy document:

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/4358/part_2_pages_79-156

appers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All of our neighbours offered

> supporting letters for the plan but the planner

> still said "no", citing borough policy.


Letters of support from neighbours carry little weight, afterall, in 5-10 years they may well have moved house.

Planners are dispassionate and will take the long term view of what's best for the area in accordance wuth their policy...

  • 2 weeks later...
Loft conversions on old terraces can have a massive impact on your neighbour's light. Most people get a loft conversion for the extra room and the lovely light, airy feel. It seems slightly ironic that in gaining your light space you may be taking from your neighbours.
  • 2 weeks later...

I've been thinking about this as well VickiO. Extending a pitch V to a habitable space I've also seen referred to as getting a mansard roof. There are actually 2 houses on Nutfield that have them. One's more discreet than the other but I've not noticed them before I started out to look which must say something as I do tend to look around when I'm out and about.


Good luck with your searches. Would be great if you let us know how the planning process goes. Lots of recent refusals for mansards on the southwark planning website which is disheartening but there is definitely precedent all over. One can only hope the right discreet respectful design would pass muster. Several of the refusals I read had not been in pre planning discussion.

  • 2 months later...

Hi Mrs Teamtime


Yes I have seen the Nutfield loft extensions also but very disheartening to know lots of refusals from Southwark. I think they are one of the most discreet type of loft extensions


It's still only a pipedream at this stage but i'd love to know if you take it further. I thought nobody had replied to the message hence only picking all these up now


Thanks!

Hi Malumbu

Sorry for delay on this -had no notifications anyone replied! The London roof is in a V so you can build into your existing loft space and up to the exisiting height of outside side brick work. Not imposing from the front or the back and no neighbourly light issues too.

Still researching, getting ideas and quotes, seems to be about the ?40k mark which is a lot but still cheaper than moving to a 2 bed in ED!

BUTTERFLY ROOFS

In some terraces the historic butterfly roof pattern survives unaltered.

In such cases, roof extensions will normally be unacceptable.

However, if the terrace has been altered and includes other roof extensions, a mansard extension may be acceptable but the "V" shaped parapet wall should be retained.

Gap between two terraces.

Mansard with butterfly parapet retained at rear. http://www3.westminster.gov.uk/spgs/publications/Roof%20guide.pdf p21

  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...
Hey all, this is a really interesting thread. We've got a proposal in with planning at the moment to convert our butterfly roof. Following pre-planning advice (where they said it basically wouldn't ever happen because of the v, being in an unbroken line of butterfly roofs and seeing the structure from the street) we went back to the drawing board. We now have a proposal that can't be seen from the street, doesn't rise above parapet, doesn't destroy the v and isn't too big. Because various dormers have been put on the back of some of the houses, the look has already been spoilt. Now the only sticking point is the existing roof structure. We've been told if we can show some examples of successful conversions - especially in rows of London roofs, we MIGHT be in with a chance. Possibly. Does anyone know of anyone who has had success? I'll look at the suggested Nutfield road, choumert road and crystal palace road, thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much! This forum is the best, secured in 15 minutes! 
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...