Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen a single child playing on closed off Melbourne Grove despite the tasteful bits of bunting and tubs of chalk. They're probably inside on their Play Stations! What I have seen is it's now impossible to get a bus from East Dulwich to Denmark Hill station in under half an hour, so was obliged to drive to work the other day! How is that good for the environment? I won't even mention the impact on local shops and emergency vehicles.
The GG roundabout repairs really clogged things up, to be fair, but I agree that Melbourne Grove and Court Lane are lacking in life. Walking is a good option - it's about twenty-five minutes from The Plough to DH station and you can even make use of the empty wastes of Melbourne Grove!

MG is a street where nearly all the houses have large gardens, why would it be necessary for children to play in the street? As you say, most will be inside doing something.


claresy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't seen a single child playing on closed

> off Melbourne Grove despite the tasteful bits of

> bunting and tubs of chalk. They're probably inside

> on their Play Stations! What I have seen is it's

> now impossible to get a bus from East Dulwich to

> Denmark Hill station in under half an hour, so was

> obliged to drive to work the other day! How is

> that good for the environment? I won't even

> mention the impact on local shops and emergency

> vehicles.

I'm not a homeowner, I don't have a garden, I don't own a car, and I don't cycle.


I live on Melbourne Grove, and the rhetoric regarding people who live on these streets on the forum is utterly insane.


"just car parks for the rich" - You do know there is a council housing estate right on Melbourne Grove, right?


"I haven't seen a single child playing on closed off Melbourne Grove" - And why would you? Bikes, motor bikes, and cars still make use of the road. I've got a child, and despite not owning a garden, I wouldn't let them go and play on the road. However, you would be happy to know that a local group of kids use the corner of Melbourne and Chesterfield frequently for skateboarding.


I get that LTNs are such a massively charged subject, and a lot of people get very passionate about it. At least with Melbourne Grove (I can't speak for other roads), I'd like to see less assumptions being made about the sort of people living on these streets. You must remember that the majority of people are just living their lives and aren't as rich as imagined.

So I'm sure you understand the frustration of residents living on the already busy roads like Lordship Lane that have to now deal with much higher volumes of traffic (= more noise and air pollution) and you wouldn't oppose reopening Melbourne Grove - would you?



EDguy89 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not a homeowner, I don't have a garden, I

> don't own a car, and I don't cycle.

>

> I live on Melbourne Grove, and the rhetoric

> regarding people who live on these streets on the

> forum is utterly insane.

>

> "just car parks for the rich" - You do know there

> is a council housing estate right on Melbourne

> Grove, right?

>

> "I haven't seen a single child playing on closed

> off Melbourne Grove" - And why would you? Bikes,

> motor bikes, and cars still make use of the road.

> I've got a child, and despite not owning a garden,

> I wouldn't let them go and play on the road.

> However, you would be happy to know that a local

> group of kids use the corner of Melbourne and

> Chesterfield frequently for skateboarding.

>

> I get that LTNs are such a massively charged

> subject, and a lot of people get very passionate

> about it. At least with Melbourne Grove (I can't

> speak for other roads), I'd like to see less

> assumptions being made about the sort of people

> living on these streets. You must remember that

> the majority of people are just living their lives

> and aren't as rich as imagined.

I'm very confused now! I thought the idea was to make the streets safe to play and assumed that meant you couldn't drive a car or motorbike through them - hence the traffic jams and the chalk provided for children. If they're not safe for children to play and they're clogging up other roads and causing problems for local businesses and emergency vehicles, what is meant to be the point of them?! Have I misunderstood something? I do know the estate on Melbourne Grove used to have a little playground for the children living there, although that may have gone now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good Afternoon, I want to inform you all about the new met police system, Met Engage. This is a new two way  communication system that helps keep the community and the police connected. It is quick to sign up, just fill out a few details and then the survey through the email to receive specific information about your area. It is accessible through any web browser at Home Page - Met Engage or by scanning the QR code shown below.  Any issues or questions please do not hesitate to ask.
    • Hello, I'm from Ireland and would love my children to be able to know the language - I can speak it but I'm not so good at teaching it. If there's anyone local who used to teach Irish at primary school (preferably Connemara Irish) and who'd like to tutor 3 boys aged 7-10 for an hour or two a week please do let me know. Thanks, Sarah
    • In a veggie and went a few weeks ago and there was a lot to offer and super tasty - enjoy 🙂
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...