Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean "Chimpanzee cells".


And a cell line originating from a single aborted fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.


I wonder if admin could remove this thread, perhaps?

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Chimpanzee adenovirus vector" does not mean

> "Chimpanzee cells".

>

> And a cell line originating from a single aborted

> fetus (many years ago) does not mean that your

> vaccine contains bits of unborn baby.

>

> I wonder if admin could remove this thread,

> perhaps?

It is listed as what it contains, surely it should say how it is made instead, either way, some people may object to taking something made in this way

Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus - Cowpox.


"How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong immune response from one dose in other vaccines. It has been genetically changed so that it is impossible for it to grow in humans. This also makes it safer to give to children, the elderly and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely in thousands of subjects."


https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-the-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

If it is so Safe and effective, why is it necessary for UK Gov to give the Pharma companies legal indemnity

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html



JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't forget Smallpox was beaten by a cow virus -

> Cowpox.

>

> "How the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine works

> The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus

> vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened

> adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in

> chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most

> suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2

> vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong

> immune response from one dose in other vaccines.

> It has been genetically changed so that it is

> impossible for it to grow in humans. This also

> makes it safer to give to children, the elderly

> and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as

> diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very

> well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely

> in thousands of subjects."

>

> https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-07-19-t

> he-oxford-covid-19-vaccine

UK and others countries have a "No Fault compensation scheme" for all vaccines so companies making the vaccine don't get sued - not just Covid


This article suggests the sum paid should be increased for COVID but the point is that indemnity for the company developing the vaccine is common for all vaccines.


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00065-7/fulltext

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is listed as what it contains, surely it should

> say how it is made instead, either way, some

> people may object to taking something made in this

> way


Thank you for modifying your original post, and no longer claiming the virus contains cells from chimpanzees and human fetuses.


Yes I am sure you are right, some people may object to potentially millions of lives being saved using this technology. Some people object to all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It is listed as what it contains, surely it

> should

> > say how it is made instead, either way, some

> > people may object to taking something made in

> this

> > way

>

> Thank you for modifying your original post, and no

> longer claiming the virus contains cells from

> chimpanzees and human fetuses.

>

> Yes I am sure you are right, some people may

> object to potentially millions of lives being

> saved using this technology. Some people object to

> all sorts of things. Some people are idiots.


You are right about potentially millions as we don't have an accurate count of deaths, did they die of covid or with covid?


A Department of Health and Social Care source summed this up as: ?You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then be hit by a bus in July and you?d be recorded as a Covid death.?


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/21/analysis-why-englands-covid-19-death-toll-is-wrong-but-not-by-much

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you have to die within 28 days of catching covid

> for it to be called a covid death.

>

> ps ive reported this thread too.

Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it does not mean they died of Covid it means they died with Covid.

Someone terminally ill with another disease in a hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying with Covid

It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported this for.

The number of deaths within 28 days of testing positive for covid in the UK is quite close to the excess deaths over and above the average rate. 119K vs 116K so far. So if it has been over-counted, it is only fairly marginal.


So not only are you spreading false info about vaccines, you're also trying to play down the tragic death toll.

uplandrd2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> covid

> > for it to be called a covid death.

> >

> > ps ive reported this thread too.

> Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> died with Covid.

> Someone terminally ill with another disease in a

> hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> with Covid

> It's a real fact so not sure what you've reported

> this for.


I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a covid death. increasing our sad total further.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uplandrd2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > alice Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > you have to die within 28 days of catching

> > covid

> > > for it to be called a covid death.

> > >

> > > ps ive reported this thread too.

> > Yes, they say that every hight on the News, it

> > does not mean they died of Covid it means they

> > died with Covid.

> > Someone terminally ill with another disease in

> a

> > hospice who also has Covid is counted as dying

> > with Covid

> > It's a real fact so not sure what you've

> reported

> > this for.

>

> I reported this because you wrote that being 'hit

> by a bus' months after covid would qualify as a

> covid death. increasing our sad total further.


I did not say that, it was written in the Guardian article that I linked to. This Public Health emergency has changed our lives, all im saying is are we sure the numbers are correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...