Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Took a rare stroll this afternoon with hubby to Dulwich Park. Eynella Road appears to be covered with dog poo, we meandered all over the place trying to avoid getting it on our shoes. Park crowded - dogs on and off leads, adults and kids on bikes and scooters weaving their way around pedestrians and prams. A couple with a buggy were sharing food and drink with elderly couple (grandparents?) on one of the seats. A man on a skate board came towards us on the pavement suddenly - I did not have time to move so he fell off his board into the road.Did not appear hurt, Could see that in the distance a large group appear to be meeting - or was it coincidental that around 20 people were all standing in the same spot? Hubby wanted to return home as too many people, dogs,bikes on the road and pavement, many of them were considerate but spoilt by the attitude of others who disregarded park users. Must have been a couple of hundred people out in the road from the Court Lane Gate to half way down the field where cafe is.
Nunhead cemetary also busy these days. Most considerate but enough who don't even try to distance; make any effort to move at all (am sick of doing nearly all the moving over); puffy joggers running close from behind; groups several side by side; etc etc etc. Also some groups really noisy - not respectful in a cemetary and not good for the wildlife either. Ggrrr.

Also Dulwich and Sydenham woods although very muddy when we walked there yesterday in addition to being busy on the narrow paths still had people jogging which made for some uncomfortable moments of me stepping off the path into the bushes or almost slipping in the mud to get out of their way.

I really am NOT anti joggers my OH jogs almost daily but all I ask is that they try and show respect for others dont run up to them puffing in their face, or run uncomfortably close behind them.

THINK-not everyone is agile enough to dodge out your way.

cant you slow your pace a little rather than running uncoftably close up behind pedestrians?

If its a nice day chances are pavements and parks will be busy-perhaps jog earlier in the morning or later in the evening like my OH does-

I remember some years ago there were questions being asked of the local police about pavement cyclists and the dangers they presented to pedestrians. The general consensus was that young children were safer on the pavement with either an adult cycling alongside them on the road, or walking. As far as I am aware, it is still illegal to cycle on the pavement. Our local copper at the time would turn a blind eye to young children on small bikes riding on the pavement as it was safer than the road, but older primary/secondary age kids with or without adults, he would ask them to use the roads.


Given the number of cyclists now using the pavements, the police would not be able to make any effective measures.


I assume if you were knocked down by a pavement cyclist - it would be 'dangerous driving'. If you were injured by a jogger - i.e them knocking into you would it be assault?

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I jog a few times a week. I am completely

> unapologetic about that. Like I say, I try go out

> at night. But it always seems to be me making

> space for oncoming pedestrians, running into the

> road or mud, or waiting between parked cars to let

> people past. Almost never any sort of mutual

> cooperation. So tbh the bad will is not entirely

> one way. If you are one of the good ones (there

> are some), then thank you.



I find myself always moving out of the path of oncoming joggers, with rarely any acknowledgment on their part.

Cyclops Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find myself always moving out of the path of

> oncoming joggers, with rarely any acknowledgment

> on their part.


Well if nobody else appreciates that, *I* do!


And to be fair, as I mentioned a few posts back, on Saturday evening, I did notice that pedestrians seemed generally more considerate than my "fellow" joggers.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cyclops Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I find myself always moving out of the path of

> > oncoming joggers, with rarely any

> acknowledgment

> > on their part.

>

> Well if nobody else appreciates that, *I* do!

>

> And to be fair, as I mentioned a few posts back,

> on Saturday evening, I did notice that pedestrians

> seemed generally more considerate than my "fellow"

> joggers.


🙂👍

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...