Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I reckon that Man City will walk it, and Palace will not get a lot more points/goals this season. Note to the OP, please use a proper title on the thread. Note to DD, you sound like a chap/chapess who knows about engineering and could do with a project (note to all, a friendly private discussion on a different thread)


That's nicely confused things. Good post on routemasters, my knowledge was drawn from a documentary, trips to the transport museum and Acton, and some personal and professional interest. I can talk more about emissions standards, retrofitting buses and the like. And once drove a bus around a car park which was fab.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://twitter.com/ShaunBaileyUK/status/136931024

> 4866785282

>

> Shaun Bailey is that candidate.

>

> If you are confident that would be a vote-winner,

> maybe get yourself over to William Hill as they

> will give you 16/1 on that currently.


It's easy to promise everything to everybody but I don't think he'd be in a position to deliver.

I think with Mayoral elections people are less inclined to vote purely along party lines, ditto local elections, and the individual comes more into play, hence why the 'liberal' version of Johnson won.

Bailey is an appalling choice of candidate, trying to tap into an illiberal, nationalist populist vote that simply hasn't got the numbers in London, witness his Tweeted attempt to capitalise on the murder of that young woman yesterday. I would've thought the Tories had learned a lesson with Goldsmith's rejection last time after pandering to islamophobia. Obviously not...

that's enough to win on the first round.


Porritt (Lib Dems), Berry (Green), Reid (Womans Equality Party) and Gammons (UKIP) trailing.


Lawence Fox doesn't seem to even make the poll.


"Strikingly, 17 per cent of Londoners who voted Conservative at the 2019 general election intend to vote for Khan in May and a further six per cent say they will abandon the Tories for Berry.Only 67 per cent said they will vote for Bailey."


https://www.onlondon.co.uk/sadiq-khan-has-devastating-26-point-lead-in-latest-london-mayor-opinion-poll/

I was listening to, without watching, the BBC 10 o'clock news tonight and thought they were advertising a new episode of Red Dwarf as I swear I heard Arnold Rimmer speaking, then I looked up and saw it was Kier Starmer launching labours run up to local elections.


I now can't watch him without hearing Space Corp Directive 435, no opposition leader should wear plaid in the house of commons 😱

How would anyone be able to answer that?


I infer that you don't think he has done a great job and can't comprehend that others might have a view that is different to your own. Am I way off in thinking that?




Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is that down to half of London believing Khan has

> done a good job or a case of not wanting a Tory

> mayor ?

>

> Would be interesting to understand rationale

Duncanw, it's a curiosity,I didn't infer anything, you are trying to read between the lines too much and making your own conclusion.


But to put the record straight, I find any mayor of London an expensive layer of bureaucracy that possibly isn't needed. After all between the abolition of the GLC and the first new mayor we didn't have the whole circus and things ran without any real problems.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was listening to, without watching, the BBC 10

> o'clock news tonight and thought they were

> advertising a new episode of Red Dwarf as I swear

> I heard Arnold Rimmer speaking, then I looked up

> and saw it was Kier Starmer launching labours run

> up to local elections.

>

> I now can't watch him without hearing Space Corp

> Directive 435, no opposition leader should wear

> plaid in the house of commons 😱


Oh good god you're right.


But does that make Boris Dave Lister.

Hi Spartacus,


I did the inferring, which literally means reading between the lines and drawing a conclusion.


You're not really putting the record straight as you have answered a completely different question from the one that you originally posed.


Thinking about your question a bit more though, possibly the best answer I have is that as two out of the last three mayoral elections have been won by a Conservative candidate, that the actual candidate plays a big part in it. But that is me reading between the lines again, so may not be the rationale at all... :)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was listening to, without watching, the BBC

> 10

> > o'clock news tonight and thought they were

> > advertising a new episode of Red Dwarf as I

> swear

> > I heard Arnold Rimmer speaking, then I looked

> up

> > and saw it was Kier Starmer launching labours

> run

> > up to local elections.

> >

> > I now can't watch him without hearing Space

> Corp

> > Directive 435, no opposition leader should wear

> > plaid in the house of commons 😱

>

> Oh good god you're right.

>

> But does that make Boris Dave Lister.


He sure as hell isn't fashionable enough to be the cat.


But Kryten 🤔

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That Brian Rose chap looks like a cartoon version

> of what most people think a banker looks like....

>

> All he needs is a monacle and a fob watch to

> complete the picture....



Brian "Plandemic" Rose. no thankyou.

Obviously Khan will walk it. But it got me thinking tonight that Sean Bailey had been put up as a patsy. The Tories could have put up a stronger candidate but is suits their agenda to both use the current mayor as a scapegoat, but also that this will keep the outer boroughs conservative, where he and his centre left politics are generally not supported.

Current polling puts Khan on 53% and Sean Bailey on 28%, so that's a fairly safe bet - if you could find someone to take it!!


Bailey is a spectacularly weak candidate. It's hard to conceive that the Conservatives couldn't have found someone more credible. I don't buy that he's a patsy though, in that he's been deliberately set up to fail. Labour don't have much to cling on to right now, but a centre-left mayor of London winning a landslide second term is something to celebrate and a beacon for what Labour needs to be to regain it's standing nationally. I am sure the Tories would rather win London if they could.


So why Bailey? Difficult to answer, but maybe:

No-one else really fancied it

CHQ liked the idea of a black candidate

Fundamental lack of due dilligence

Current polling puts Khan on 53% and Sean Bailey on 28%, so that's a fairly safe bet - if you could find someone to take it!!


Bailey is a spectacularly weak candidate. It's hard to conceive that the Conservatives couldn't have found someone more credible. I don't buy that he's a patsy though, in that he's been deliberately set up to fail. Labour don't have much to cling on to right now, but a centre-left mayor of London winning a landslide second term is something to celebrate and a beacon for what Labour needs to be to regain it's standing nationally. I am sure the Tories would rather win London if they could.


So why Bailey? Difficult to answer, but maybe:

No-one else really fancied it

CHQ liked the idea of a black candidate

Fundamental lack of due dilligence

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Obviously Khan will walk it. But it got me

> thinking tonight that Sean Bailey had been put up

> as a patsy. The Tories could have put up a

> stronger candidate but is suits their agenda to

> both use the current mayor as a scapegoat, but

> also that this will keep the outer boroughs

> conservative, where he and his centre left

> politics are generally not supported.



Inner Londoners still gradually moving to Outer Boroughs and the Home Counties - not sure whether it will have an effect eventually or even if they turn Tory :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...