Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?ve removed a few bricks from the party wall with next door, and noticed they don?t seem to use their loft - I don?t see them going in there and there?s only a few boxes of junk in there, some suitcases, chairs, and Christmas decorations. I regularly go in my own loft as it?s been converted to an en-suite bedroom. As they don?t similarly use theirs I was wondering if I went in there and started using it regularly for extra storage if in a few years I could claim it as my own additional loft via adverse possession?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275840-using-my-neighbours-loft/
Share on other sites

No. What I?ve done to monitor their usage of the loft is to install in my loft space a ?Mr Beams? motion sensitive light directed toward the (small) hole in the party wall, then if they go in the loft, the light is triggered and that is then picked by my light sensitive webcam in my loft space and I get an app alert on my iPhone 6s. I haven?t had any app alerts since I installed the system 2 weeks ago, so I know they don?t use their loft.

Whoeveritis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate these lofts, they completely ruin the

> Victorian houses. Ugly doesn?t even come in to it.

> Why not just buy a bigger house that isn?t an

> eyesore, is it because people are greedy?


Why bother doing any upkeep or renovation work right? Your house needs repainting? Just buy a newly painted house that isn't an eyesore.

Bob Buzzard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hamletter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bob,

> > It's up there with you ham in Hertfordshire

> query.

> > Let's have more.

>

>

> It was Herefordshire actually.


My dyslexia, sorry.

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whoeveritis Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I hate these lofts, they completely ruin the

> > Victorian houses. Ugly doesn?t even come in to

> it.

> > Why not just buy a bigger house that isn?t an

> > eyesore, is it because people are greedy?

>

> Why bother doing any upkeep or renovation work

> right? Your house needs repainting? Just buy a

> newly painted house that isn't an eyesore.


Painting a house is different to ruining architecture

Whoeveritis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate these lofts, they completely ruin the

> Victorian houses. Ugly doesn?t even come in to it.



I think there are worse things than lofts which ruin the Victorian style of the houses. At least you generally only see the hideous lofts from the back.


Inappropriate double glazed windows at the front which aren't sash windows are worse, I think, and also plantation (I think they're called) shutters, though I can see from a functional point of view they are good.


ETA: Anyway, I think Bob is probably referring to the original loft, not some carbuncle stuck onto it.


ETA: As you were, sorry 😂

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whoeveritis Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I hate these lofts, they completely ruin the

> > Victorian houses. Ugly doesn?t even come in to

> it.

>

>

> I think there are worse things than lofts which

> ruin the Victorian style of the houses. At least

> you generally only see the hideous lofts from the

> back.

>

> Inappropriate double glazed windows at the front

> which aren't sash windows are worse, I think, and

> also plantation (I think they're called) shutters,

> though I can see from a functional point of view

> they are good.

>

> ETA: Anyway, I think Bob is probably referring to

> the original loft, not some carbuncle stuck onto

> it.

>

> ETA: As you were, sorry 😂



Fgs...

Used to have noisy neighbours and I'd sit in bed thinking of schemes such as drilling into their loft and filling it with chlorine. Glad I didn't as the acid bath worked much better.


Also had a terraced house in Nottingham where the cellar was longer than the house, went into soil flooring and then continued, I assume into the street behind. It freaked me out so we bricked it up at an appropriate place.

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am i the only one who thinks spying on your

> neighbours is creepy?

> Which part of the house next? Peepholes to the

> bathroom?

> And no, to adverse possession, but a possible yes

> to trespass and harassment



It's a joke!

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am i the only one who thinks spying on your

> neighbours is creepy?

> Which part of the house next? Peepholes to the

> bathroom?

> And no, to adverse possession, but a possible yes

> to trespass and harassment


But, I?m not directly spying in them - all I?ve done is put a small hole in our party wall (which I?m allowed to do as it?s shared) then pointed a motion sensitive light at it, which activates my loft webcam and sends an app alert to my phone if they go in their loft and activate the motion sensitive light. I also have webcams on the front and rear of my house so I can monitor comings and goings on my street, such as Amazon deliveries, and take-out food deliveries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...