Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Given the disruption to education over the past 12 months (and continuing) is there a valid case for the government to 'write off' this academic year across all year levels?...and start afresh in September in the same school year as was started last Septmeber.


This would have the effect of basically making a permanent shift in the the ages of schooling from 4-17 to 5-18...which in itself I don't see as a massive problem, as arguably kids start school too young in the UK anyway.


A key issue obviously comes at each end of that age range...parents expecting their 4 year olds to start school this September would suddenly be asked to wait another year (so the govt may have to provide further childcare funding support), and those who thought they were off into the world or off to uni at the end of this academic year will have another year to wait. Obviously this will see knock on effects at Universities...but if properly funded by the government (i.e. effectively underwrite university fees this year), then it could mean something similar is done at tertiary level, which wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, given the cohort of students who were set to graduate this year would be let loose on a jobs market which will have no jobs for them in 2021 (giving the economy a year to recover could make a lot of sense for hiring plans to normalise). And of course what of children who go to pvt schools...should parents be asked to pay an additional year of tuition from what they originally expected?


Anyway, plenty of practical problems with such a suggestion...but would they be insurmountable when offset against the potential problems arising for children's education that such a drastic move might solve?

I do remember as a 16 year feeling that missing a year or resitting it seemed it would be the biggest disaster in the world.


At 25 it seemed like not much really - just a year - the most important thing is your goal being something you really want and that it'll make you happy and also it's obtainable/realistic. Many people do the same job for years on end.


If we do make them redo it lets give them counsel as to what they want and how they should go about getting it so they won't regret what they choose to do.

There?s no easy solution, especially given the wide variability in lockdown provision between schools. I?m aware even within ED there is a huge difference in what schools are providing. I know my son would be distraught at being asked to do the same stuff for another year.


It would present huge infrastructure problems - you?d effectively have to create a whole new year of nursery supply for delayed reception children. At the other end, how do Universities pay their bills if they have no intake for a year?


The thought has occurred to me but the financial and practical implications are massive. Given everything central and local government has to do to rollout the vaccine and respond to all the issues, I?d be amazed if there is capacity to deal with everything that this would need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For Plusnet, I pay £31.99 for Full Fibre 500.  (the number is the line speed you have paid for) I have recently recontracted.  Always phone them up, and ask what deal they can do for me.  Usually get a decent reduction.  Sue, I would suggest you call them, especially if you are close to contract renewal.  Sometimes they will change deals mid-contract, as I have found in the past.      
    • The drivers generally have the same set area to cover every day, so they're fairly easy to follow - quite often on bike. They organise their drops to maximise how many they can do within a given time - there's actually software at the depot to do this before they set off - so they tend to follow the same route. Certain addresses are delivery hotspots, some have two or three drops a day from the various couriers. It all adds up doorstep deliveries being incredibly easy to target. I suspect Vladi's neighbour hasn't had their fake parcel nicked, not because of their security, but because the thief simply wouldn't have seen the driver stop there, so there's nothing to steal. The losses are factored in, driving prices up for everyone, and the drivers are treated abysmally. It's a dreadful business. It needs regulating.   Sorry, cross post with Angelina and Alec1
    • Amazon seem to do this more and more now.  They don't even ring the doorbell, just leave them lying on the door step, then you find out it's been delivered when you check tracking.  The official Amazon vans are frequently followed on their routes by thieves and take the opportunities freely given.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...