Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ken78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > >

> > > I don't do "important community work".

> > >

> > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> > have

> > > organised music stages at some community

> > events.

> > >

> > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> >

> >

> > No it isn't necessarily

>

> sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me ?????



No.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus, get a grip, you're embarrassing

> yourself...



And yet more proof of your bullying ...


But if people want even more proof, on the 6th Jan this year on the "we are indeed fortunate" thread, it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've never resorted to calling you names


Maybe it's time people stood up and say "no more" when you belittle them and the forum can get back to a place of lively discussions, humour and fun again instead of the seething cesspit of rage that it often is now.

Trolley Snatcha Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 🙄🙄🙄

> >

> > I don't do "important community work".

> >

> > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> have

> > organised music stages at some community

> events.

> >

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

>

>

> Wow! your partner and you run music gigs? I bet

> they were proper raucous affairs! And what of

> these music stages you speak of- im most

> intrigued, since Glastonbury is off ive been

> looking for an altenative.

>

> whatever would the good folk of ED do without you?



You're a real asset to this forum, aren't you?


(That was sarcastic, BTW)

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


Still trying to destroy my character rather than posting constructive comments ...


Sticks and stones ....


I never said state sponsored genocide, that's your comment and opinion ....


But if you want me to resort to your playground tactics


diable rouge is a BULLY

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude on here along the lines of "well if someone says something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to be fair)....but is that really how we collectively want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are hesitant to express a view? When people feel attacked for saying what they think, their inclination will be to 'dig in/double down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two way street, then they may concede certain points and end up softening their view anyway.


And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone has said something that you think is 'stupid' might be a more productive use of keystrokes?

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > > never resorted to calling you names

> >

> > Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> > How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> > going?...

>

> DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude

> on here along the lines of "well if someone says

> something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called

> out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to

> be fair)....but is that really how we collectively

> want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are

> hesitant to express a view? When people feel

> attacked for saying what they think, their

> inclination will be to 'dig in/double

> down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two

> way street, then they may concede certain points

> and end up softening their view anyway.


That assumes that a poster is inclined to soften their view. I'm not sure that's the case with some posters.

If you look at the 'Deniers' thread I did exactly that and he double downed.



> And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment

> anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone

> has said something that you think is 'stupid'

> might be a more productive use of keystrokes?


I understood what he said, and indeed kept saying.

Context is everything...

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ken78 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wordsworth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > > >

> > > > I don't do "important community work".

> > > >

> > > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did)

> and

> > > have

> > > > organised music stages at some community

> > > events.

> > > >

> > > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> > >

> > >

> > > No it isn't necessarily

> >

> > sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me

> ?????

>

>

> No.


shame

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's really cool, how do you make the letters go

> bold like that ?



You do it as you would in html.


You will have to Google it as I can't work out a way to do it unless I do a screenshot of what I type.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's really cool, how do you make the letters

> go

> > bold like that ?

>

> Magic

>

> I could show you but when I type the commands in

> it makes the text bold so it doesn't help ...

>

> Lol



I tried to do that by putting "close bracket" in the first command and "open bracket" in the second command, instead of the actual (well, the other way round) but that didn't work either!

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay

> I did send it to kid

> But

> And admin don't shoot me for this

>

> Type the following without spaces

>

> your text

>

> Which results in

>

> your text

>

> Please pay ?2 to my PayPal account

> Name SpartacusWantsAComedyShowcase



Ah! I hadn't thought of doing it with spaces!


But I use b, not strong .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh - I found a little tutorial site.

>

> https://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp



I think that was where I learned html what seems like zillions of years ago. Over a very intensive weekend.


Then I spent the next weekend learning CSS.


It was very useful at the time 😶

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazing I remember when all this was brand new.

> Makes me feel ancient.

>


Looking back, this must have been about twenty years ago.


Putting together a website from scratch.


Bloody hell. Twenty years!!! 😮😮😮

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...