Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you have a Combination boiler checking your water pressure is easy and vital part of your boiler maintenance. If you do not keep your boiler pressure at a good safe level you will risk damaging major components inside your boiler.


Checking the pressure is simple if you look on the front of your boiler you will find either a numbered gauge or a coloured gauge, if you have the first option you will need to make sure the pressure is kept at around 1.5bar.


If it's the second option simply ensure your boiler is kept in the green zone. If you find that your boiler is under pressure you will need to fill the system up to the required level. To do this simply look for a filling loop, about 65% of boilers have an external filing loop. Simply open the valve until you are in the green zone or at 1.5 bar.


please visit .london-boiler-repair:http://www.london-boiler-repair.co.uk/boilerrepair.php

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27525-checking-boiler-pressure/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...