Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is a vendor (indy owned, not chain) at liberty to refuse a refund and only offer a like-for-like exchange on faulty confectionary, such as chocolate, if it is returned shortly after purchase and almost intact? If it is the law that they can do so, is it mostly likely that they would choose to allow refund of such a low-cost item for good will reasons? (Ie. is that the prevailing convention.)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275222-faulty-food-confectionary/
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One chunk (not eaten, but spat out, though I did

> not return that bit). Faulty - wrong choice of

> word but when I wrote it I couldn;t think of

> another.



So what was actually wrong with it? (I'm on tenterhooks here, OMG my life is so boring 🤣🤣🤣)

Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great, was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you which shop it was but will say that the proprietor was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he was selling. I refused a replacement because I thought I could well get another naff one - the batch or subsequent storage could have been off, etc. which I thought was a rational approach.


I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement that my complaint is being handled.


NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.


Watch this space!

I once complained about some chocolates.


Unfortunately I left the "faulty" box of chocolates on my bed, and a friend's dog ate them 😂😂😂 plus some of the cardboard 😂😂😂


I did explain why I couldn't return them and luckily the manufacturer (can't remember who it was) found it amusing.


If memory serves, they sent me a load more chocolates and their best wishes to the "discerning dog".


I don't remember the dog being sick, but I don't think she can have felt very well 🤢

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great,

> was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and

> wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you

> which shop it was but will say that the proprietor

> was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he

> never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to

> start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he

> was selling. I refused a replacement because I

> thought I could well get another naff one - the

> batch or subsequent storage could have been off,

> etc. which I thought was a rational approach.

>

> I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement

> that my complaint is being handled.

>

> NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.

>

> Watch this space!


I have also bought iffy Lindt chocolate at an independent store on LL. I contacted Lindt and they sent me some vouchers which were of greated value than what i had spent.

My old nan, bless her, had a habit of writing to various companies complaining of various faults.


All food related, usually confectionary.


As grandkids, we could never understand why there was a reliable supply of sweets and chocolates under her bed, but pre computerisation, I guess her shenanigans went under the radar!

I love boring! I live for it! So, to add to the mind-eating tedium I give you the next instalment. Get nice and comfy, Trolley! You know you are loveable and sweet and vulnerable under that sociopathic exterior! Fluffy bunny slippers on, Troll-ey? Good. Then I'll begin.


Lindt replied, saying it is likely to do with storage at too high a temperature so I will be getting a fiver in vouchers. (Not usable, alas, at Tesco and CoOp.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...