Jump to content

Chargeback dispute with merchant - advice please


Jules-and-Boo

Recommended Posts

hi


I challenged a service using the banks chargeback process which gives the merchant the opportunity to challenge my claim. My claim ws upheld and I received my money back.


I am now getting calls from the merchant requesting I settle the amount.


Are they able to pursue this, even though I've already successfully challenged it through the chargeback scheme?


it's all a bit too stressful


thanks

JB

The below is advice to merchants, so unless you've got a refund from both the merchant and the scheme ( a double refund) - I'd just quote the below.


https://www.opayo.co.uk/blog/uncertain-times-chargebacks


"The final decision in favour of one party or the other, which is made by the card scheme rather than the issuer, cannot be challenged further, other than through the process of bringing the matter before a court."

It?ll cost the merchant to take you to court, Covid is delaying court schedules/processes significantly, let them waste their time and money bringing you to court.

You?ll produce the evidence of the card issuer backing you up and the magistrate will think the merchant is just a chancer and wasting court time.

I would wager.

> General ED issues / gossip


??


> You?ll produce the evidence of

> the card issuer backing you up


What might that prove?


In any case, do card issuers willingly release their documents?


> and the magistrate will think


It would be a County Court matter.


What is the loss that the merchant would be seeking to recover?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thanks JohnL

>

> oh, so they can go to court. In which case, what

> is the point of a chargeback? Unless the court

> would hold any value in it?



The point is you were able to recover your money without taking them to court, and putting the ball in their court to deal with. Given it costs ?70+ to make a claim in the courts, it?s unlikely they will bother especially given that the card scheme has already found in your favour.

?45.


Spoke to a legal colleague who said they can go through courts (as Ian said) so I?ve just paid it as really can?t deal with the stress and if they win I?d have to pay their fees too.


Also given there is an element of ambiguity

Well, it shouldn?t be Sue but it?s hard to take abusive phone calls while home schooling and also working.

I don?t think I?m wrong but have to balance the energy and effort and time it would take to dispute it against what else I could be doing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...