Jump to content

Chargeback dispute with merchant - advice please


Jules-and-Boo

Recommended Posts

hi


I challenged a service using the banks chargeback process which gives the merchant the opportunity to challenge my claim. My claim ws upheld and I received my money back.


I am now getting calls from the merchant requesting I settle the amount.


Are they able to pursue this, even though I've already successfully challenged it through the chargeback scheme?


it's all a bit too stressful


thanks

JB

The below is advice to merchants, so unless you've got a refund from both the merchant and the scheme ( a double refund) - I'd just quote the below.


https://www.opayo.co.uk/blog/uncertain-times-chargebacks


"The final decision in favour of one party or the other, which is made by the card scheme rather than the issuer, cannot be challenged further, other than through the process of bringing the matter before a court."

It?ll cost the merchant to take you to court, Covid is delaying court schedules/processes significantly, let them waste their time and money bringing you to court.

You?ll produce the evidence of the card issuer backing you up and the magistrate will think the merchant is just a chancer and wasting court time.

I would wager.

> General ED issues / gossip


??


> You?ll produce the evidence of

> the card issuer backing you up


What might that prove?


In any case, do card issuers willingly release their documents?


> and the magistrate will think


It would be a County Court matter.


What is the loss that the merchant would be seeking to recover?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thanks JohnL

>

> oh, so they can go to court. In which case, what

> is the point of a chargeback? Unless the court

> would hold any value in it?



The point is you were able to recover your money without taking them to court, and putting the ball in their court to deal with. Given it costs ?70+ to make a claim in the courts, it?s unlikely they will bother especially given that the card scheme has already found in your favour.

?45.


Spoke to a legal colleague who said they can go through courts (as Ian said) so I?ve just paid it as really can?t deal with the stress and if they win I?d have to pay their fees too.


Also given there is an element of ambiguity

Well, it shouldn?t be Sue but it?s hard to take abusive phone calls while home schooling and also working.

I don?t think I?m wrong but have to balance the energy and effort and time it would take to dispute it against what else I could be doing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Eleanor, I run the Just Dance Fit classes mentioned above. It would be lovely to have you there. I’m at the dance studio at Harris Girls’ Academy on Homestall Road throughout the year every Monday, Wednesday and Sunday: Mondays 6:30-7:30pm - Just Dance Fit Mondays 7:30-8:30pm - Flowetic Wednesdays 6:30-7:30pm - Flowetic Sundays 10:30-11:30am - Flowetic Lots of information and booking via the website: www.justdanceuk.com but if you have any questions don’t hesitate to drop me a line at 07522 231 446 or [email protected]. Hope this helps! Fiona =)
    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...