Jump to content

Chargeback dispute with merchant - advice please


Jules-and-Boo

Recommended Posts

hi


I challenged a service using the banks chargeback process which gives the merchant the opportunity to challenge my claim. My claim ws upheld and I received my money back.


I am now getting calls from the merchant requesting I settle the amount.


Are they able to pursue this, even though I've already successfully challenged it through the chargeback scheme?


it's all a bit too stressful


thanks

JB

The below is advice to merchants, so unless you've got a refund from both the merchant and the scheme ( a double refund) - I'd just quote the below.


https://www.opayo.co.uk/blog/uncertain-times-chargebacks


"The final decision in favour of one party or the other, which is made by the card scheme rather than the issuer, cannot be challenged further, other than through the process of bringing the matter before a court."

It?ll cost the merchant to take you to court, Covid is delaying court schedules/processes significantly, let them waste their time and money bringing you to court.

You?ll produce the evidence of the card issuer backing you up and the magistrate will think the merchant is just a chancer and wasting court time.

I would wager.

> General ED issues / gossip


??


> You?ll produce the evidence of

> the card issuer backing you up


What might that prove?


In any case, do card issuers willingly release their documents?


> and the magistrate will think


It would be a County Court matter.


What is the loss that the merchant would be seeking to recover?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thanks JohnL

>

> oh, so they can go to court. In which case, what

> is the point of a chargeback? Unless the court

> would hold any value in it?



The point is you were able to recover your money without taking them to court, and putting the ball in their court to deal with. Given it costs ?70+ to make a claim in the courts, it?s unlikely they will bother especially given that the card scheme has already found in your favour.

?45.


Spoke to a legal colleague who said they can go through courts (as Ian said) so I?ve just paid it as really can?t deal with the stress and if they win I?d have to pay their fees too.


Also given there is an element of ambiguity

Well, it shouldn?t be Sue but it?s hard to take abusive phone calls while home schooling and also working.

I don?t think I?m wrong but have to balance the energy and effort and time it would take to dispute it against what else I could be doing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...