Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Strangely both are correct ... no wonded English is so hard to learn.


denier


noun

plural noun: deniers

a person who denies something, especially someone who refuses to admit the truth of a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence.


noun

a unit of weight by which the fineness of silk, rayon, or nylon yarn is measured, equal to the weight in grams of 9,000 metres of the yarn and often used to describe the thickness of hosiery.

Here's a controversial idea


With a small proportion of the population saying they won't have the vaccine, should the NHS record their NHS number on a database and then refuse them treatment if they catch Covid ?


After all they don't believe Covid exists or think it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch it so won't need treatment 🤔

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> After all they don't believe Covid exists or think

> it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch

> it so won't need treatment


What about those that are genuinely worried about possible side effects, is it safe etc?...

It would serve them (deniers) right, but it'll never be done like that - because the proposal is far more than 'controversial' :)


Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a controversial idea

>

> With a small proportion of the population saying

> they won't have the vaccine, should the NHS record

> their NHS number on a database and then refuse

> them treatment if they catch Covid ?

>

> After all they don't believe Covid exists or think

> it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch

> it so won't need treatment 🤔

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > After all they don't believe Covid exists or

> think

> > it's a government conspiracy so they won't

> catch

> > it so won't need treatment

>

> What about those that are genuinely worried about

> possible side effects, is it safe etc?...


That's a case of education and reassurance but if they still refuse, unless for genuine medical reasons, then they should be deemed to have signed away the right to covid treatment


It's similar to the principle (but not the same as) the organ donor register now uses, unless you have specifically said not to use your organ's after death they can be ..

I endorse the sentiment Spartacus....particularly given these people endanger all of the rest of us.


But would it open the floodgates for..say..smokers to be denied treatment for lung cancer? Overweight people denied treatment for diabetes? Car owners denied treatment for car crash injuries? Tories denied treatment for fox hunting injuries?, Lib Dem's denied treatment for injuries sustained due to be being largely irrelevant? Brexiteers denied any treatment developed in the EU? Remainers denied treatment paid for by the last 350m per week of NHS funding....anyway, I may have got carried away..you get the gist.....

CNN went live to the Boris news conference today and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms of deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an interest in UK politics recently - maybe they're gaining UK based viewers.


The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff about having tried his best and done everything he could..

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But would it open the floodgates for..say..smokers

> to be denied treatment for lung cancer? Overweight

> people denied treatment for diabetes? Car owners

> denied treatment for car crash injuries? Tories

> denied treatment for fox hunting injuries?, Lib

> Dem's denied treatment for injuries sustained due

> to be being largely irrelevant? Brexiteers denied

> any treatment developed in the EU? Remainers

> denied treatment paid for by the last 350m per

> week of NHS funding....anyway, I may have got

> carried away..you get the gist.....



This is done already I'm sure to an extent - they use a quality of life algorithm to decide who will get the money and who won't. The below seems to have gone too far but it shows what happens.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/gusalexiou/2020/06/23/unlawful-do-not-resuscitate-orders-for-disabled-covid-patients-outrageous/?sh=6cb328876cf1

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> CNN went live to the Boris news conference today

> and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms of

> deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> interest in UK politics recently - maybe they're

> gaining UK based viewers.

>

> The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff

> about having tried his best and done everything he

> could..


What's this for to do with people denying the virus exists or are you just having a rant ?


Stick on topic !

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> today

> > and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms

> of

> > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> they're

> > gaining UK based viewers.

> >

> > The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff

> > about having tried his best and done everything

> he

> > could..

>

> What's this for to do with people denying the

> virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

>

> Stick on topic !


Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let the virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it was the influence of his evil mate who is probably still skulking around).


This was the impression the CNN team gave to viewers when he said "I did everything I could" - the camera cut and they all looked at each other.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> > today

> > > and gave a summary of where the UK is in

> terms

> > of

> > > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> > > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> > they're

> > > gaining UK based viewers.

> > >

> > > The look on their faces as Boris said his

> stuff

> > > about having tried his best and done

> everything

> > he

> > > could..

> >

> > What's this for to do with people denying the

> > virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

> >

> > Stick on topic !

>

> Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let the

> virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it was

> the influence of his evil mate who is probably

> still skulking around).


Ah I see


So it's a rant


Boris, as you remember, caught and went to hospital with covid so I think he hasn't denied it exists. He's made mistakes granted but so have governments around the world.


This thread is about people denying that covid exists by protesting, trying to convince others to break rules and potentially refusing vaccination.


If you want to be political please do it on one of the other political based threads.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > JohnL Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> > > today

> > > > and gave a summary of where the UK is in

> > terms

> > > of

> > > > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking

> an

> > > > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> > > they're

> > > > gaining UK based viewers.

> > > >

> > > > The look on their faces as Boris said his

> > stuff

> > > > about having tried his best and done

> > everything

> > > he

> > > > could..

> > >

> > > What's this for to do with people denying the

> > > virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

> > >

> > > Stick on topic !

> >

> > Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let

> the

> > virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it

> was

> > the influence of his evil mate who is probably

> > still skulking around).

>

> Ah I see

>

> So it's a rant

>

> Boris, as you remember, caught and went to

> hospital with covid so I think he hasn't denied it

> exists. He's made mistakes granted but so have

> governments around the world.

>

> This thread is about people denying that covid

> exists by protesting, trying to convince others to

> break rules and potentially refusing vaccination.

>

>

> If you want to be political please do it on one of

> the other political based threads.


If you tell me what to do I'll do the opposite thanks.


This thread talked about tights earlier so why pick on my comment unless you have an agenda ?

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > If you tell me what to do I'll do the opposite

> > thanks.

>

> And that highlights the issue

>

> People don't like to be told what to do


LOL especially me :)


I do follow the vaccination advice though and will go down to get it when I'm asked.

Imagine the scene, autumn 2021.

Many of the tens of thousands of people who refused to have a vaccine have ultimately caught Covid.

Coughing and spluttering away they could at first be forgiven for having an early seasonal cold, but the biometric 'Covid Star' tattooed onto the back of their hand is a give-away.

Not entitled to any medical treatment as part of the glorious leader's 'solution', they try and go about their daily business as normal, but their is no sanctuary.

Their homes are daubed with graffiti, and when they dare to venture outside, passers-by frown at them and cross the road, making sure to avoid eye contact.

Some hurl insults, reminding them that it's only a matter of time before they are rounded up and sent to the 'holding-camps', that only 6 months earlier had been re-education facilities, in the vain hope that they could be convinced to have the vaccine.

At least this way the public don't have to witness as their condition worsens, doctors and nurses won't have to wrestle with their conscience when some manage to break through a hospital's security cordon, banging on windows in a vain attempt to get help.

No one has to worry about a sick relative, friend, or neighbour. Or seeing someone suffering a slow, painful death, and having to witness their last dying gasps of breath.

After all, they had it coming to them...

Been reading Mein Kampf again DR?

😱


Whilst you painted a very stark picture like that, if they refuse the vaccine and deny covid exists then why are they allowed to waste valuable NHS resources if they do catch it ? After all , in their minds, it's not going to kill them or anything ?


Sadly the truth is people will refuse the vaccine, the virus will be transmitted by them and as a result it will fund ways to mutate and infect the vaccinated resulting in this pandemic going on and on and on. So whilst you were trying to paint a dystopian future there is a question of how to make the vaccine deniers take it to protect the masses , should it be deny them covid treatment, should it be peer pressure (much like the campaigns in the past to make us wear seat belts or reduce drink driving )


The issue (and whilst I was being controversial with my post) is how to ensure everyone is protected and the virus can't get a foothold and mutate enough to make the vaccine invalid.


Maybe something to discuss rather then trying to paint me and others as part of the new order 🤔

Spartacus Wrote:

================

"why are they allowed to waste valuable NHS resources if they do catch it ? After all, in their minds, it's not going to kill them or anything ?"


In their minds no, in reality yes it can kill them. We allow free speech and free views, no matter how crazy. This is the price we pay for those privileges, sometimes people spout next-level BS.

I appreciate it wasn't a serious question :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...