Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Strangely both are correct ... no wonded English is so hard to learn.


denier


noun

plural noun: deniers

a person who denies something, especially someone who refuses to admit the truth of a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence.


noun

a unit of weight by which the fineness of silk, rayon, or nylon yarn is measured, equal to the weight in grams of 9,000 metres of the yarn and often used to describe the thickness of hosiery.

Here's a controversial idea


With a small proportion of the population saying they won't have the vaccine, should the NHS record their NHS number on a database and then refuse them treatment if they catch Covid ?


After all they don't believe Covid exists or think it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch it so won't need treatment 🤔

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> After all they don't believe Covid exists or think

> it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch

> it so won't need treatment


What about those that are genuinely worried about possible side effects, is it safe etc?...

It would serve them (deniers) right, but it'll never be done like that - because the proposal is far more than 'controversial' :)


Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's a controversial idea

>

> With a small proportion of the population saying

> they won't have the vaccine, should the NHS record

> their NHS number on a database and then refuse

> them treatment if they catch Covid ?

>

> After all they don't believe Covid exists or think

> it's a government conspiracy so they won't catch

> it so won't need treatment 🤔

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > After all they don't believe Covid exists or

> think

> > it's a government conspiracy so they won't

> catch

> > it so won't need treatment

>

> What about those that are genuinely worried about

> possible side effects, is it safe etc?...


That's a case of education and reassurance but if they still refuse, unless for genuine medical reasons, then they should be deemed to have signed away the right to covid treatment


It's similar to the principle (but not the same as) the organ donor register now uses, unless you have specifically said not to use your organ's after death they can be ..

I endorse the sentiment Spartacus....particularly given these people endanger all of the rest of us.


But would it open the floodgates for..say..smokers to be denied treatment for lung cancer? Overweight people denied treatment for diabetes? Car owners denied treatment for car crash injuries? Tories denied treatment for fox hunting injuries?, Lib Dem's denied treatment for injuries sustained due to be being largely irrelevant? Brexiteers denied any treatment developed in the EU? Remainers denied treatment paid for by the last 350m per week of NHS funding....anyway, I may have got carried away..you get the gist.....

CNN went live to the Boris news conference today and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms of deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an interest in UK politics recently - maybe they're gaining UK based viewers.


The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff about having tried his best and done everything he could..

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But would it open the floodgates for..say..smokers

> to be denied treatment for lung cancer? Overweight

> people denied treatment for diabetes? Car owners

> denied treatment for car crash injuries? Tories

> denied treatment for fox hunting injuries?, Lib

> Dem's denied treatment for injuries sustained due

> to be being largely irrelevant? Brexiteers denied

> any treatment developed in the EU? Remainers

> denied treatment paid for by the last 350m per

> week of NHS funding....anyway, I may have got

> carried away..you get the gist.....



This is done already I'm sure to an extent - they use a quality of life algorithm to decide who will get the money and who won't. The below seems to have gone too far but it shows what happens.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/gusalexiou/2020/06/23/unlawful-do-not-resuscitate-orders-for-disabled-covid-patients-outrageous/?sh=6cb328876cf1

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> CNN went live to the Boris news conference today

> and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms of

> deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> interest in UK politics recently - maybe they're

> gaining UK based viewers.

>

> The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff

> about having tried his best and done everything he

> could..


What's this for to do with people denying the virus exists or are you just having a rant ?


Stick on topic !

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> today

> > and gave a summary of where the UK is in terms

> of

> > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> they're

> > gaining UK based viewers.

> >

> > The look on their faces as Boris said his stuff

> > about having tried his best and done everything

> he

> > could..

>

> What's this for to do with people denying the

> virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

>

> Stick on topic !


Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let the virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it was the influence of his evil mate who is probably still skulking around).


This was the impression the CNN team gave to viewers when he said "I did everything I could" - the camera cut and they all looked at each other.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> > today

> > > and gave a summary of where the UK is in

> terms

> > of

> > > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking an

> > > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> > they're

> > > gaining UK based viewers.

> > >

> > > The look on their faces as Boris said his

> stuff

> > > about having tried his best and done

> everything

> > he

> > > could..

> >

> > What's this for to do with people denying the

> > virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

> >

> > Stick on topic !

>

> Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let the

> virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it was

> the influence of his evil mate who is probably

> still skulking around).


Ah I see


So it's a rant


Boris, as you remember, caught and went to hospital with covid so I think he hasn't denied it exists. He's made mistakes granted but so have governments around the world.


This thread is about people denying that covid exists by protesting, trying to convince others to break rules and potentially refusing vaccination.


If you want to be political please do it on one of the other political based threads.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > JohnL Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > CNN went live to the Boris news conference

> > > today

> > > > and gave a summary of where the UK is in

> > terms

> > > of

> > > > deaths and cases. They seem to be taking

> an

> > > > interest in UK politics recently - maybe

> > > they're

> > > > gaining UK based viewers.

> > > >

> > > > The look on their faces as Boris said his

> > stuff

> > > > about having tried his best and done

> > everything

> > > he

> > > > could..

> > >

> > > What's this for to do with people denying the

> > > virus exists or are you just having a rant ?

> > >

> > > Stick on topic !

> >

> > Boris is a denier at heart. He would have let

> the

> > virus run rip if he was allowed (or maybe it

> was

> > the influence of his evil mate who is probably

> > still skulking around).

>

> Ah I see

>

> So it's a rant

>

> Boris, as you remember, caught and went to

> hospital with covid so I think he hasn't denied it

> exists. He's made mistakes granted but so have

> governments around the world.

>

> This thread is about people denying that covid

> exists by protesting, trying to convince others to

> break rules and potentially refusing vaccination.

>

>

> If you want to be political please do it on one of

> the other political based threads.


If you tell me what to do I'll do the opposite thanks.


This thread talked about tights earlier so why pick on my comment unless you have an agenda ?

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > If you tell me what to do I'll do the opposite

> > thanks.

>

> And that highlights the issue

>

> People don't like to be told what to do


LOL especially me :)


I do follow the vaccination advice though and will go down to get it when I'm asked.

Imagine the scene, autumn 2021.

Many of the tens of thousands of people who refused to have a vaccine have ultimately caught Covid.

Coughing and spluttering away they could at first be forgiven for having an early seasonal cold, but the biometric 'Covid Star' tattooed onto the back of their hand is a give-away.

Not entitled to any medical treatment as part of the glorious leader's 'solution', they try and go about their daily business as normal, but their is no sanctuary.

Their homes are daubed with graffiti, and when they dare to venture outside, passers-by frown at them and cross the road, making sure to avoid eye contact.

Some hurl insults, reminding them that it's only a matter of time before they are rounded up and sent to the 'holding-camps', that only 6 months earlier had been re-education facilities, in the vain hope that they could be convinced to have the vaccine.

At least this way the public don't have to witness as their condition worsens, doctors and nurses won't have to wrestle with their conscience when some manage to break through a hospital's security cordon, banging on windows in a vain attempt to get help.

No one has to worry about a sick relative, friend, or neighbour. Or seeing someone suffering a slow, painful death, and having to witness their last dying gasps of breath.

After all, they had it coming to them...

Been reading Mein Kampf again DR?

😱


Whilst you painted a very stark picture like that, if they refuse the vaccine and deny covid exists then why are they allowed to waste valuable NHS resources if they do catch it ? After all , in their minds, it's not going to kill them or anything ?


Sadly the truth is people will refuse the vaccine, the virus will be transmitted by them and as a result it will fund ways to mutate and infect the vaccinated resulting in this pandemic going on and on and on. So whilst you were trying to paint a dystopian future there is a question of how to make the vaccine deniers take it to protect the masses , should it be deny them covid treatment, should it be peer pressure (much like the campaigns in the past to make us wear seat belts or reduce drink driving )


The issue (and whilst I was being controversial with my post) is how to ensure everyone is protected and the virus can't get a foothold and mutate enough to make the vaccine invalid.


Maybe something to discuss rather then trying to paint me and others as part of the new order 🤔

Spartacus Wrote:

================

"why are they allowed to waste valuable NHS resources if they do catch it ? After all, in their minds, it's not going to kill them or anything ?"


In their minds no, in reality yes it can kill them. We allow free speech and free views, no matter how crazy. This is the price we pay for those privileges, sometimes people spout next-level BS.

I appreciate it wasn't a serious question :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
    • Hi just got a player so looking for tapes  pm me thanks 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...