Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know it's so called veganuary at the moment but today I saw a product called "green cuisine chicken free dippers" that look and taste like chicken dippers


Why ?


If you want to eat a product that looks and tastes like chicken then chicken is the answer!


If you want to be vegan then surly the point is to eat things that aren't a "meat" substitute (in name, taste or appearance)


A vegan friend said its to convince meat eaters that they are eating a meaty product but is it right ?


Should new names be invented for vegan products so that it's clear what they are ?

Bacon could become vecon

Burgers could be vamburgers

Sausages could be sawdustes


It directly strikes me as weird that vegans want to call their products after the associated meaty name


What are others thoughts from both sides of the meat / free table ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/274988-i-just-dont-get-it/
Share on other sites

Yeah Sparts, I've always had 'a problem' with veggies wanting meat-looking food (which by definition is going to be processed).

Not that I think they shouldn't, but why oh why ?

Perhaps it's the meat-eaters-turned-veggie crowd that need the comfort of meat-looking processed products.

Vegetables are a decent food, no need to cover it up, they're nowt to be ashamed of !!

Respect your vegetables, come out of the veggie closet and embrace the whole scene proudly !

Mrs Manjula can help.

https://www.manjulaskitchen.com

Some people like the taste of meat but don't want the cruelty associated with killing animals.

Some people like to eat food that's like what they were familiar with before they went vegetarian/vegan.

Some people want to eat less meat.

There's nothing about the word sausage or burger than indicates that it's come from an animal. It's basically a shape indicator.

Using words that people are familiar with gives them an idea of what it's like. Nobody is going to something called a veggie or vegan burger and be confused that it's not beef/chicken/whatever.


There are lots of vegetarians/vegans who don't eat these products. These products don't make up a large proportion of most vegetarians/vegans diets. In fact, a lot of these products are bought by people who are trying to reduce the amount of meat they are eating, or just fancy trying something different.


It's about choice, making things easy etc. Why should it bother you?


So many articles, you can see it's a very common question. These are just a few of the first that came up on google:

https://plantbasednews.org/opinion/vegans-hypocrites-realistic-fake-meat/

https://www.livekindly.co/what-point-vegan-fake-meat/

https://chooseveg.com/blog/why-do-vegans-eat-fake-meat/

https://www.her.ie/food/meat-substitutes-501566

\https://www.glueandglitter.com/why-do-vegans-eat-fake-meat/

Thanks elloriac


You gave a very balanced response, it's not a case of being bothered but more the confusion over why a group of people, who often quote the reason that they are vegan as against the use of animals for food, are marketed to by manufacturers using meaty terms or names


It just seems counter intuitive and the question is, to appeal to all vegans regardless of reason, should new food names be introduced ?


I agree with KK, a lot of these products are processed and that isn't good either.


I'm still interested in views from both sides

I went veggie for a few months in India - best food ever !

Every dish looked like it had vegetables in it.

I think it?s a Western thing wanting meat-looking products made of processed vegetables (and god knows what else), cos we?re so precious compared to people living a bit nearer the harsh end of life (and we can afford it).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...