Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 March 2021 Financial Times: Net Zero starts with swapping your gas boiler for a heat pump. Houses have to go all electric. It has to be planned. And it isn?t ?cheap?.


https://digital.olivesoftware.com/Olive/ODN/FTUK/Default.aspx


Here's an energy regulation "sandbox" Want to play? The only people in the sandbox at the moment is a "peer-to-peer". East Dulwich could be a "peer-to-peer" as well. Can we meet our own electricity needs in large part?


https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/regulatory-sandbox-repository?utm_medium=email&utm_source=dotMailer&utm_campaign=Daily-Alert_01-03-2021&utm_content=Regulatory+Sandbox+Repository+&dm_i=1QCB,79MBW,35NMB,TGQ2J,1



All the Churches

All the schools

All the shops like Sainsbury's


covered with solar


Radio 4 NET ZERO IN THE HOME

The Bottom Line


https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p097d3wx




Everything is transparently explained





No one is taking up the Green Home Scheme money. Money extended. FT 17 February


Astroturf lawns and the problem of foxes pooing on the outdoor carpet. No one is adding ecological building blocks to their renovations


Green grants: https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/home-grants/article/home-improvement-grants/green-homes-grant-aX6Py8n2pzQB


New Standards (2030 is 8 years away btw):


What does the Green Homes Grant cover? You must install either insulation or low-carbon heating to qualify for the vouchers. These are called ?primary? measures under the scheme and include: Insulation: solid wall insulation, cavity wall insulation, under-floor insulation, loft insulation, flat roof insulation, room-in-roof insulation, park home insulation Air-source heat pump Ground-source heat pump Solar thermal water heating Biomass boilers


Read more: https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/home-grants/article/home-improvement-grants/green-homes-grant-aX6Py8n2pzQB - Which?


The latest Which? magazine profiles the expected completely electric house standard. The problem is renovating a 100 year old solid wall brick house. I've entirely renovated to the 2030 standard by dumb blind good luck from 2004 to now. If you'd like to talk and see what I've done to avoid the dumb and blind parts contact me by private message. We can talk outside with plenty of air wearing masks.




https://www.jackwallington.com/17-reasons-to-avoid-fake-lawns-how-bad-is-artificial-grass-for-the-environment/

mynamehere Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All my neighbours are putting in Astroturf lawns

>

> https://www.jackwallington.com/17-reasons-to-avoid

> -fake-lawns-how-bad-is-artificial-grass-for-the-en

> vironment/



I bloody hate it too.

people seem to consider (like my neighbours) these facts trivial in 2021


17 reasons to avoid fake lawns ? how bad is artificial grass for the environment?



1) Artificial turf uses huge volumes of plastic

If you stop to think about all of the materials in your home and garden, you?d be hard pressed to find anything that uses so much plastic. Single use plastic straws have been banned and replaced by paper in the UK and are a good comparison to the plastic lawn although it feels different because the fake lawn is multiple use. I ran a quick calculation that you can do yourself whereby if a person used say, one disposable plastic straw a day for a year, over the course of 15 years that would be 21,900 straws for a family of 4 at 12kg of plastic. Looking at one product, fake grass weighs around 1.42kg/metre. Our little urban garden is around 35 square metres so if we were to cover half in plastic grass, that would be 24.85kg of plastic, still there after 15 years and over four times the amount of plastic that would exist if the two of us used a plastic straw every single day for that time.


2) Plastic grass can?t or won?t be recycled

Astro turf is made from a variety of human made unnatural materials including polyethylene, polypropylene and nylon. These materials are built to last, potentially for centuries. While individually these components can theoretically be recycled, in reality this isn?t happening for fake lawns for the following reasons. First, the materials are often bound together making it impossible to separate them and therefore making it impossible to recycle, because recycling of the materials requires them to be separated and pure. Some products are made from just one material which means at least, theoretically they can be recycled. Secondly, they need to be clean to be recycled. After spending 5 ? 10 years outside on top of soil and surrounded by planting, with people running and walking across it, the amount of debris they collect (like a densely packed broom) makes the material very hard to prepare for recycling. You can?t recycle plastics with contaminants in like soil and grit, which is why we?re supposed to rinse plastic before putting in the recycling bin. Thirdly, this is a specialist form of recycling, local councils certainly aren?t set up to recycle them, they need to be sent away. At the time of writing, the number of specialist recycling plants is to my knowledge minimal if non-existent in the UK (please get in touch to correct me and I?ll update this) and that doesn?t even account for people organising to send it off. What will most people prefer, dumping it for free in the local tip or paying for it to be taken away and cleaned for recycling? Hopefully one day it can be recycled as we need the existing lawns to be recycled, but that doesn?t account for the remaining 14 points.


3) Pieces of plastic grass will pollute soils for centuries

Like it or not pieces of plastic lawn break down and contaminate our soils for centuries regardless of being recycled. With the best will in the world, individual blades of fake grass tear off and blow into planting areas or bare soil nearby. Although plastic takes decades or centuries to deteriorate, it does still deteriorate releasing microplastics into soils which find their way into soil micro organisms. We?re only just starting to understand this is happening and the damage it is causing to the natural world. Eventually we may be able to recycle the bulk of a plastic lawn but it will be impossible to extract microplastics from soil and soil life.


4) Astro turf has a big carbon foot print from manufacture, transport and installation

The processes involved in mixing, colouring and moulding all of the plastic releases carbon. In addition, further carbon is released from the energy used (i.e. from electricity production). Then you have to factor the carbon released from transporting these heavy rolls by lorry from the manufacturing plant to the customer, probably being first transported to a storage facility. Soil is a natural carbon store, especially with plants growing on it, slowly taking carbon from the atmosphere and putting it back into the plants and the ground (why people want to plant more trees ? which is a problematic view in itself but a whole other discussion!) By digging out a real lawn which has carbon locked in it and the top 15-30cm-ish of soil, not only do you remove a large area of planting that is actively locking carbon into the ground, but you?re releasing all of that locked carbon back into the atmosphere. The top layer of soil is removed to put down a base of hardcore and sand. Once the astro turf is in place, that?s it, that whole area stops locking carbon from the atmosphere.


5) Fake lawns look awful after only a few years

This gives them a very short shelf life in comparison to other hardlandscaping products. Despite manufacturers claiming they last for 10 ? 20 years (which is still a short a life span for outdoor surfaces) in reality the pieces of plastic grass blades become worn down and squashed in the same way as carpets, although obviously the plastic is tougher for outdoor and rougher use.


6) Astro turf kills soil life beneath it

By creating a dense plastic barrier on top of compacted soil and sand, no garden material can reach the soil beneath it. Things like leaf litter and grass clippings, which may be in tiny amounts in a normal garden after mowing and tidying but still exist. Natural materials like this are essential for feeding soil organisms like worms and microscopic animals that keep soil healthy. This is little different to impermeable hard landscaping like patios but a really important point if you?re considering replacing a live lawn with a fake lawn. Even if you remove all clippings and leaves from a real lawn, real grass grows and dies back and rejuvenates every year. Roots grow and die, some leaves die and these form natural material drawn into the soil to feed the soil life. I could go into great detail about why soil life is important because it?s the building blocks of our entire way of life, and another simple example is birds picking out bugs and worms for food. Some astro turf does still have worms beneath but this will likely be under a new laying or toward the edges where soil is richer from nearby planting.


7) Plastic deprives people from contact with a natural surface

This may sound really silly if you?re thinking of installing plastic grass, escaping a natural surface is probably one of the reasons you want it in the first place. But I urge you to think again, I actually think this is one of the most important points on this list. Some of my favourite childhood memories are sitting on a soft lawn, hands on the grass, plucking a blade of grass to whistle with, or a daisy or dandelion flower, or a plantain leaf. That sense of touch and the smell of mown grass is such an important part of my life experience and remains so today. Swapping this natural element of a garden can make sense for stopping mud or saving time, but it deprives people of something much bigger and much more valuable ? one of the main contacts with nature, so important in urban areas. I feel sad at the thought of children growing up with fake lawns and everything they will miss in those early years as a result. Even getting a bit muddy or seeing a spider, all of these things are little life experiences that make us who we are.


8) Fake lawns have no wildlife benefit whatsoever

Even a perfectly kept lawn with no weeds has a base layer of wildlife value because it?s a good home to millions of soil dwelling critters, most so microscopic we can?t see them. Worms, grubs and grass eating caterpillars, slugs and snails all feed birds too. I?m guessing you may be thinking ?urgh I don?t want those on my lawn!? but you won?t see most of these most of the time ? though I would encourage you to try and see the benefit and beauty of these little lives. Forgetting the need for that perfect lawn, a lawn with daisies and other weeds go up in wildlife value ten-fold. The Plantlife charity found a lawn kept to around 10cm or thereabouts has even more weedy wildflowers and supports thousands more bees, hoverflies and other pollinators.


9) Looks ? plastic lawns never sit naturally in any environment

This is the point that I guess is subjective and most people who think fake grass looks neat don?t like but astro turf never looks like anything but astro turf. One of the reasons for having it often cited is that it?s used where real grass won?t grow, such as in full shade but that?s one of the reasons it doesn?t look right. It?s obvious it?s not supposed to be growing there. As astro turf improves its look, products that look increasingly like real grass come to the market that look more convincing but when laid still look like unnatural blocks of plastic grass. It?s the imperceptible things like blowing in the wind, the way it looks in rain, the smell, small imperfect patches or insects and birds ? these little things all add up in our mind to point out this thing isn?t real due to their absence.


10) Plastic lawns can overheat in summer making them unusable

Plastic lawns retain heat from the sun more than a natural lawn, in some instances this can make them so hot that you can?t walk on them.


11) Fake lawns need cleaning and maintaining

As an unnatural surface that doesn?t recycle germs, dirt and other debris as a natural lawn would, you need to clean it. This includes brushing, washing and quite often, hoovering!


12) Some fake lawns can give friction burns

Not all to be fair, but one touch of fake grass will tell you that you or your children won?t want to skid across it with bare knees.


13) There are many alternatives for soft surfaces

In a number of designs for family gardens I?ve created we use a thick layer of bark chip in play areas and a real lawn for running around etc. There isn?t any need for a fake lawn, which is actually far harder a surface than natural bark chip. You don?t want children falling off a swing on fake grass.


14) There are alternatives to fake lawns for flat surfaces for wheel chairs or people with poor balance

I can understand why people would want a fake lawn in this situation but again I personally would want to find a solution that doesn?t harm the environment and gives everyone the equal opportunity to experience a natural lawn or natural garden. A real lawn can be firm and flat if it?s maintained well and perfectly accessible to people in wheelchairs or people less sure on their feet. Around a real lawn, paths and patios can be laid for further access during wet weather or in winter. In fact, in accessible gardens I?ve designed we simply haven?t bothered with large lawns, instead having a good easily manageable flat lawn and then offering plenty of paths through larger plantings to touch and sit within.


15) Lawns can grow in shaded plots

Obviously we have to be realistic because with too much shade, lawns really aren?t possible but there are shade tolerant grasses that can be used. Quite often when people say to me that their garden is too shaded, I actually just see before me poor maintenance. If it really were too shaded, I would just design in something else, not persevere with a fake lawn.


16) Maintenance of a real lawn is cheaper

I actually feel lawns as a concept are overrated in general and I don?t understand why people insist on having them when often they don?t use them. But if you do use the lawn, and there are good examples such as for children, sunbathing, sports and picnics, all it takes is getting the lawn care regime right. This is fairly scientific but really comes down to knowing when to mow it properly, to keep an eye out for problems like compaction and to reseed and repair patches. If this sounds like too much hard work, hire a professional lawn care gardener. For the cost of a fake lawn you could hire someone for well over five years, longer than it will take for a fake lawn to look worn out and grubby. Robot lawn mowers are also a thing of wonder, they do work well and although fairly expensive, are still a tenth of the cost of having astro turf installed.


17) Fake lawns can cause surface run off contributing to flooding

Natural lawns or planting allow water to drain into the soil surface easily, helping to lock deluges of rain in the ground. Whereas solid surfaces cause run off which leads to flooding usually by overloading drains and sewers with too much water all at once. Occasionally they contribute to direct flooding too, especially in paved front gardens. Although water can drain through fake lawns (at least if laid well it should!) this can be slower and less effective than real grass due to the ground below needing compaction to make it solid and flat. In the worst cases you do get run off. Obviously this is going to be better than impermeable patios but it?s not an either or game, we need to be aware of these issues and choose other options that don?t cause run off (and other damage to the environment listed

I like all your posts Sue. Tiny Forests. A group tried to nudge Southwark into making cemeteries into these years ago. in 2020 the concept swept the world (if anyone was listening :)


https://earthwatch.org.uk/component/k2/tiny-forest


https://ideas.ted.com/how-to-grow-your-own-tiny-forest/


https://www.ivn.nl/tiny-forest/tiny-forest-worldwide


https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p094c7jm

fake grass is divorce material in my world. The kids played on muddy gardens and were made to enjoy it. Ah many the Saturday football training in a swamp on the Rye.


Of course all weather pitches are a good thing, but plastic grass in your garden? And the Dulwich Woodhouse....

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Of course all weather pitches are a good thing,

> but plastic grass in your garden? And the Dulwich

> Woodhouse....



OMG has the Woodhouse got fake grass?


Not that I've ever liked its "garden" much ..... but I never noticed it had fake grass :(

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Of course all weather pitches are a good thing,

> > but plastic grass in your garden? And the

> Dulwich

> > Woodhouse....

>

>

> OMG has the Woodhouse got fake grass?

>

> Not that I've ever liked its "garden" much .....

> but I never noticed it had fake grass :(



Fake grass for fake people.


Horrible stuff!

It's pretty revolutionary stuff and helps maintain the pitches for the whole season - go back even twenty years ago and they would be mud baths by now. It's well less than half of the grass. Astroturf has also come on leaps and bounds (4g) to the pitches I played on in my early days when you would get plastic burns and the ball would bounce, and bounce and bounce (any QPR fans out there). But these are for professional use.


Fake grass in the garden just looks wrong for so many reasons and I get amusement as many gardens around here are on slopes so it gathers at places.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To add paving your garden or using pebbles is no

> better for wildlife, and for paving drainage.

> Glad I gave up on the idea of off road parking

> many years ago



Whilst I agree, like many others I have a tiny garden which is on three levels (buried air raid shelter, I understand) and to have grass would be a real pain, not least because I have nowhere to store a mower.


So I've kept the paving which was here when I moved in thirty years ago, albeit I've removed a lot of it over the years to extend the borders.


But my walls are covered with climbers which are good for wildlife 🙂 and there are plenty of ground cover plants, plus things growing in the cracks between the paving 🙂

  • 4 weeks later...
I can only ?google? this. https://www.timbawood.co.uk/news/double-glazing-listed-buildings-london/#post/0 As I?m sure you have. Dulwich Village? When I turn solar panels on my front roof in 2006 a planning officer was sent to my door to tell me they were ugly and I kid you not queen victoria wouldn?t have liked them. There?s always a solution x
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...