Jump to content

Tree damage - solicitor recommendation


laurastar

Recommended Posts

We strongly suspect a council owned tree, on the pavement in front of our house, is causing damage to our front boundary wall. The problem has been worsening over the past year and the wall is close to collapse. We have obtained a surveyors report which indicates the cause of the damage to our boundary wall (and that of a neighbour?s to our left) is very likely the tree and its unrestricted growth over the past 3 years (it has not been pruned or maintained during that time).


The council have refuted our claim in initial correspondence (they say the removal of another neighbour?s front boundary hedge two years ago has caused the issue, but have provided no surveyor?s report or other evidence....) and do not propose to take any further action (which includes maintenance to /planing of the tree). We are also not covered by our home insurance to progress a claim via them since the boundary wall apparently does NOT form part of the insured property as defined under the policy.


We would like to obtain some legal advice to work out how/if we can progress this further. The cost of repairing the front wall is one thing. Our main worry is the council?s ongoing lack of maintenance to the tree - which we fear could result in further damage to the wall and (worryingly) the house.


Can anyone help?


Does anyone have any recommendations for decent solicitors with expertise in this area?

Many years ago my neighbours had subsidence which was traced back to the large tree in front of their house. The insurance company took on Southwark Council and got part of their costs back. We heard that Southwark was rapped over the knuckles for not maintaining trees in their streets and that they were obliged to do more regular and stringent tree maintenance to reduce the number of claims which were being made against them.

Thank you all for some very good suggestions! All noted.


To answer the poster who asked - really our main aim is to get the tree growth managed/restricted so that the tree can do no further damage... It is not necessarily to recoup any costs (we could just about fund the rebuilding of the front wall ourselves, which would be a bit galling but so be it if necessary...)


I?ll check out the other thread, too.


These street trees are beautiful BUT it is such a shame the council 1) seems to have planted inappropriate trees, in places, and/or 2) hasn?t maintained them as it should.

I think many of our street trees were planted decades ago .And I know that local authorities have had large cuts in revenue ( 60p in the ? ) from central gov over the last 8 years .Spending has had to be prioritised with social care coming before tree maintenance .

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...