Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just moved into a Victorian House near Denmark Hill. There is a damp problem in the corner of the lower ground floor. The damp source is not immediately obvious.


I've spoken to a number of damp specialists, including "independent" damp surveyors, all of whom appear to be members of the Property Care Association ('PCA'). I'm not convinced by members of the PCA.


The previous homeowner had to pay a PCA member ?50(!) to have a damp guarantee transferred to our name. After taking the money, the PCA member got our address wrong and put a PO Box address and non-existent mobile phone number on the guarantee. Another PCA member emailed me to say "We have signed up to a code of ethics that prevents us getting involved in potential guarantee claims against other contractors".


See where I'm going here?


I'm looking for a trusted non-PCA professional (architect/structural engineer?) who I can pay to examine our house and say something along the lines of "Put an airbrick here/drain there/dehumidifier here/dig out that soil/you have a leaky pipe". Normal buildings surveyors don't appear to be much use beyond running along a skirting board with a moisture meter.


I'd be grateful for your thoughts and advice.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/27457-damp-problems-and-the-pca/
Share on other sites

Thank you for the suggestions so far.


Jeff looks great. I may buy his book. I am looking for a DPC skeptic like him.


Please don't take this criticism personally:


Timberwise seem to be heavy on the damp-proofing and are members of the PCA. Timberwise may well be a great firm, but I'm skeptical.

The Which? conversation appears to have been taken over by somebody who continually recommends PCA members.

As far as I can tell PCA = DPC salespeople/PR. The hurdle to joining the PCA does not appear to be high in terms of professionalism or workmanship (see my example above).

Send a pm to Hawley - he can put you on to a really excellent (and totally independent) damp expert.


PS. a useful rule of thumb: if someone offers 'free advice' it's probably because they're going to try to sell you something. Truly independent experts will charge for their services.

I'll try to keep an open mind, but looking at the other threads, Hawley seems to recommend these people:


independentspecialistsurveys.co.uk


They are yet another dreaded PCA-accredited firm. The links in their "Expert Witnesses" section all refer to people who trash Jeff Howells. Interesting. Sorry if I'm starting to sound like a paranoid conspiracy theorist.


I think I'm really just looking for a decent builder. Surely a builder can identify a lack of ventilation/leaky drainpipe/high soil line or whatever the damp source is.


I'd like to eliminate the damp source, stick in a dehumidifier for a week or two, repaint and wait to see what happens.


I'm not interested in chemical damp proof coursing or spurious testing.

We've recently had a damp proof course done on a converted Victorian flat by Kenwood, who I wouldn't necessarily recommend.


The one thing they did discover that may be of use to you, is that there were two blocked in chimneys which hadn't been properly vented. I wouldn't have realised they were there, but they were located quite close to the two worst damp patches. They are easy to fix because you just have to put vents in the top and bottom of the chimneys, and I think probably quite prevalent in Victorian houses.

Thanks sedm. This is the problem with damp-proofing companies. They put in DPCs, whatever the problem.


I think my damp source is just inadequate ventilation. Possible blocked chimney and airbrick.


Does anyone know what the flooring of a Victorian ground floor sits on? Is it likely to be be floorboards on joists with a cavity? What would be below the cavity? I know nothing about building and am trying to find pictures on Google.

I think I have the definitive answer from a structural engineer:


There are 4 causes of dampness:

1) external ground levels being higher than the internal floor level, so moisture in the ground can pass directly through the wall. Best remedy: lower external ground levels to at least 150mm below internal floor levels.

2) defective rainwater goods (blocked or broken gutters or with incorrect falls, or downpipes with open joints, blockages or cracks). Best remedy: replace.

3) leaking water pipes: incoming mains water, central heating pipes etc. Remedy: find the leak and cure it.

4) condensation. Best remedy: improve ventilation (especially under-floor), add heating, insulate, avoid sources of water like boiling water from cooking or baths near cold surfaces

websites couldve been written by same person - summarized 'chemical dpc are pointless'


but back to orig post problem - assuming ground level is above floor level [you mention a lowerground floor]

simple solution could be - dig a trench to below floor level 10/15cm wide fill with shingle - not pea but the 30-40mm stuff - this enables air to circulate without being tech heavy. I've done it - it works. but i'll bow out now.

Hi there,


Joining this conversation a bit late but have the same thoughts about expensive damp specialist jobs. We used kenwood at our last home and the damp returned and when we asked about it being sorted under the guarantee of course they had every reason to get out if it.


It looks like we have rising damp just behind our front door. Assured preservations have quoted us ?600 to fix- by injecting chemicals and re-plastering but I'm wondering too if there is another way we can solve this and one that is much less expensive!


Jpr finch or others, please let me know who you have used and if you would recommend them?


Many thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...