Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Q... What's with the title? Are you saying the

> paper article is stupid, she was stupid for being

> on the roof, or simply because she's from ED?


Plane Stupid is the name of the action group.

mark my words- the actions of precocious white middle class anarkokidz will be the spark that ignites the flames of revolution in this country - until they finish University and get a job that is.


its easy to be a radical with crusty Chic clothing and Dreads-lite and you have ther time & support to play the revolutionary for a couple of years


A Bit harder to live this life when you are on the bottom and struggle to keep your heads above water

(note: post to be read with something of a tongue in cheek)


Snorky and Quids - pish and piffle. Is Olivia to be denied a conscience or a point of view because (if) she is white and middle class? Or would you have preferred her to be attending Hunt balls, and sharpening her boot heels better to grind the faces of the poor?


If you're going to play the silly points, I shall have to go one further and accuse you both of being misogynists for attacking her. Please let's not go down that overtrodden route.

I would take the tongue out of your cheek moos, I agree with your sentiment. It's the usual inverted snobbery that people trot out on here.

a) not all students are white or middle class and conversely not all white middle class young folks are students

b) anyone can have a social conscience

c) so what if she is a future partner of Goldman Sachs?

Im not mysogonist- I despise everyone >:D<


Its just on the balance of probabailities, its a litle hobbyette, a bit of late teen angsty chest beating and an excuse to smoke roll ups and pontificate to those that have sold out to "the man" - It is all probably jolly good fun tho' and I dont doubt her sincerity at the minute.


I remember how niave I was at her age - it makes me shudder thinking about it.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK, this is a little off topic, sorry - but a

> point for debate:

>

> Do we all drift to the right (regardless of where

> we started out) as we get older? I don't mean in

> a party political, but in the sense of becoming

> more generally conservative?


IM not as textbook left, but have thought things through more to arrive at conclusions


when yer young, its much easier to come out with whatever guff you have been given to read or your peers are quoting - thats why you dont see any swappies ( SWP ) sellers older than about 26 ( there are exceptions tho', as i see down at ED station soem mornings and often make a disparaging comment to )

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> my future prediction for Olivia Chessel aged 30 -

> Senior partner at Goldman Sachs



Mr 4 Quid (or Ms), I'm thinking maybe you are overestimating odds of any female person becoming partner at Goldmans.


from the Washington Post, 2007:

>


Bless them, in 2001 they had a minuscule number of female partners, and by 2007, they had double a miniscule no of female partners!


Suspect double minuscule is probably one of those tricky maths things that turns out negative. Olivia more likely to turn out as Chief Exec of BAA.


Perhaps also there is very good reason for persons from ED to be protesting, she seems to be only one who has read the report that shows just how noisy it will get in SE22 and SE15 if plans go ahead. Even the middle classes entitled to a bit of hush?

One of the things I found quite interesting about this was that actually the picture on the front of the Metro of Olivia Chessel was of a beautifully presented woman - a tweed skirt, very conservative blouse and a string of pearls around her neck. Quite frankly she looked as if she had stepped out of a Noel Coward play. When I saw the picture inside - which are the ones Mark has linked to she looked typically grungy - the absolute stereotype of a protester.


I have no idea which image is Olivia's preference - maybe she does both looks(!) but dressing for middle England while standing on the roof of the House of Commons was a stroke of marketing genius - far more difficult to dismiss as simply another crusty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Private Lady From Your City - No Verify - Anonymous Adult Dating https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com [url=https://PrivateLadyEscorts.com] Private Lady In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Adult Dating - No Verify NEW GIRLS [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/kira-liv-69.html]Kira-Liv[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/sofia-119.html]Sofia[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/mistress-ivanka-36.html]Mistress Ivanka[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/goddess-sigal-62.html]Goddess Sigal[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/clara-blanc-95.html]Clara Blanc[/url] [url=https://privateladyescorts.com/girl/ali-cruz-32.html]Ali Cruz[/url]
    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...