Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems pretty childish to me.

>

> As Keith Starmer himself said, voting against the

> deal was a vote for no deal.

>

> Why on earth would she vote for no deal? Whose

> interest is that in? Certainly not any of ours.


She abstained - only one Labour MP voted against.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems pretty childish to me.

>

> As Keith Starmer himself said, voting against the

> deal was a vote for no deal.

>

> Why on earth would she vote for no deal? Whose

> interest is that in? Certainly not any of ours.



She didn't vote for no deal.


And if you read her long and informative letter in the link above, you will find out exactly why she abstained.

Quite. Starmer's opinion is irrelevant. Hayes has gone to some length to explain her decision, which appears to chime with the range of responses she got from her constituents. She is allowed to defy any whip if she so chooses. No-one knows at this point if the deal is going to be enough to avoid stark detriment to the UK economy, and Labour voted for the deal with expressed reservations and not because they like it, but because the other outcome of no deal would be far worse.

Sorry but the reasons in that letter are pathetic. Abstaining is as bad as voting against it (and therefore for no deal) for the reasons Keir Starmer gave yesterday:


"With no further time for negotiation, when the default is no deal, it is not a mark of how pro-European you are to reject implementing this treaty. It is not in the national interest to duck a question or to hide in the knowledge that others will save you from the consequences of your own vote. This is a simple vote, with a simple choice?do we leave the transition period with a treaty that has been negotiated with the EU, or do we leave with no deal? So Labour will vote to implement this treaty today to avoid no deal and to put in place a floor from which we can build a strong future relationship with the EU."


Our representative ducked the question and hid. It isnt good enough frankly.

I think Ms Hayes was very much between a rock and a hard place. At the referendum, and subsequently at the last General Election, her constituents have been pretty clear about what they support, and a Johnsonian Brexit isn't it. To have voted for the bill would have been a very unsympathetic gesture towards her constituents who voted to remain, and subsequently voted for her to be re-elected.


By abstaining and immediately resigning her front-bench position she is, at the very least, demonstrating integrity and solidarity with her constituents. It is, of course, a futile gesture which achieves nothing save her own peace of mind (and her reputation for integrity) - but with this constituency I don't think she could do anything else.


HOWEVER, I hope now that she works not just to represent her constituents, but towards making a success of where we are now, which is outside the EU and with the deal she abstained from approving. I hope she now looks forward, and not back to what could have been (but wasn't). That she isn't stuck in the last decade, but moves on. Or she will end up as stranded as her former leader, still fighting the battles of yesteryear. And I hope that by doing so she will be invited, soon, to re-join the front bench.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely.

> To treat this as some binary decision where only

> yes/no will suffice is missing the point of an MP

> (to represent one?s constituents).

> HH has it seems indicated her priority is her

> constituents and their concerns.



Exactly. And it would be very worrying if she had some different priority!

  • 2 weeks later...

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but the reasons in that letter are pathetic.

> Abstaining is as bad as voting against it (and

> therefore for no deal)


Voting for - 1+1=2

Abstaining - 1+0=1

Voting against - 1-1=0


Not the same thing at all.


If I had any criticism of Helen Hayes, it would be that she is not a Tory MP. Because if she was, I would be able to send her multitudinous scathing emails, and attending her surgeries, demanding that the Government start putting the good of the nation ahead of its own agenda and the agenda of its donors.

Clutterqueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems like Helen Hayes is still able to write a

> column in The Southwark News today on her 'View

> from Westminster' even though she has resigned

> from the Labour Party.



She hasn't resigned from the Labour Party!


She is no longer a shadow minister. She is still a Labour MP!


🙄

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Library of things is coming to Dulwich. It’ll be at Dulwich Leisure Centre.  https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHGIluhiqSo/?igsh=MXNnZHpmZml2cG1sYg==   Link to website: Link Library Of Things
    • Trump suffers from opening his mouth before putting his brain in gear. Needs to take a lesson in statesmanship from Carney, slow well thought out responses to media questions. How about Carney for President of the US as well. That should upset some and more.
    • As every day goes by, it looks increasingly likely that Trump is going to sell Ukraine down the river. It's a re-run of Chamberlain and Hitler over Czechoslovakia. Trump talks of re-allocating "assets" which means conceding assets of Ukraine to Putin  and of putting in peace-keeping forces into Ukraine  to "guarantee" security. History tells us that peace-keeping forces are ineffective. Remember Bosnia & Hertzogovinia in 1996. Remember the peace keepers on the Golan Heights. They disappeared without firing a shot when Serbia and Israel took military action. It will be the same in Ukraine. Give it five years (or less) and Russia will extend its land grab.  Sadly, history repeats itself because the appeasers fail to grasp the realities. Just pray that The Donald becomes the fifth before too long.  
    • Niko completed a third job for me now. A leaking tap that was oozing from everywhere. I called Niko in the morning, showed him a recording of the problem,  and he was over with a new tap, fitted within the hour. Job done, perfect! I know I can always rely on Niko. He is my go to plumber.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...