Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Concur


The current fashion for apologising for errors / sins of the past appals me.


A pardon today will have no impact on Alan Turing's. rightly deserved, place in history as a mathematical genius who played a key role in WWII and in developing the logic and philosophy that led to the creation of modern computing.


A related point for consideration - if AT is "pardoned" what does that say about all the others throughout history that were also prosecuted, imprisoned and belittled for their sexual orientation but were not famous? Either all must be pardoned - which is completely foolish (how would we identify them?) or we leave historical convictions alone.

I can't even fathom MM's logic but that's neither here nor there.


A pardon is of course meaningless to Turing, but is a way of saying sorry, and I don't think apologies are bad things for wrongs, they help to fix things.


It's not about values then and now, what happened then was simply wrong, not to say fucking ungrateful. Few men can claim to have contributed as much to winning the war as he did; what he was was known and a blind eye turned, and then they fucked him up after the job was done.


My dad knew a polish lad who killed his wife and was slapped on the wrist because he was a Battle of Britain pilot, but hell, it's not like boffing a bloke is ke murder is it.


This isn't a sop to modern norms, everyone knew it was hypocrisy then, Jesus, half of the House of Commons had boffed blokes, it's trying to say sorry for how fucked up things were.


Part of me wants no pardon so that such atrocious behaviour remains a fresh thorn, so that anyone who claims they are proud of what Britain stands for is forced to realise that, even after empire and before we were complicit in organised torture collaborating with known human rights abusers, we could still be shitty.

I'm broadly in favour.


But I wouldn't start with Alan Turing. It's not as if the decrimininalization of certain sexual acts is the sole bit of unfinished business. Lots of things have been decriminalized, including abortion, blasphemy and libel. Yet thousands suffered the penalties, including death, for having committed them. It is clear that, for the moral good of the nation, we must find out and pardon all those who have been imprisoned, fined, killed, humiliated, tortured or exiled for acts that we, currently, don't consider criminal.


As well as being morally right, a proper, coordinated effort would stimulate the economy through the wholesale employment, at public expense, of tens of thousands of otherwise redundant history graduates and struggling lawyers for decades. In fact, I see no reason why a permanent Royal Commission of National Apology shouldn't be constituted as soon as practically possible, in order to examine, cross-reference and collate the evidence found and devise some suitable National Ceremony of Pardoning to be held on as regular a basis as found necessary in order to bring much-needed comfort to the generations of decendants of those who hadn't, all things considered, really been very naughty at all.


That might, arguably, be taking things a little far. But to do anything less would mean arguing that the concept of all being equal in the eyes of the law is hokum, and justice is only due to people you happen to have heard of - an argument that, I'm afraid, is not just unprincipled, immoral and odious hogwash, but unlikely to succeed even with an unprincipled, immoral and odious legislature.

I would be totally in favour of a pardon, but for everybody who was prosecuted for homosexuality in the UK.


He was of course a brilliant mathematician. His contributions to winning the war were huge, and his influence on modern technology is immeasurable. But I really think this is a separate issue. He shouldn't be pardoned because of what he achieved, he should be pardoned because of a deeply unjust law and inhumane punishment.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> go to the science museum - huge section dedicated

> to turing and his achievements



Nobody is disputing this Alice. Turing was one of the most brilliant minds of his generation. The fact is the law was the law and Turing fell foul of the law.


Okay, we all question that law now, some 70 odd years later, because ideas have changed.


My problem with the idea of a retrospective pardon is where do you stop?


I'm sure many galley slaves are due a pardon.

  • 2 months later...

People executed in WWI for cowardice in the face of the enemy have been pardoned.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4796579.stm


The difference?

Alan Turing happened to be gay. And his prosecution and villeficaiton led to his death. It turns out he was a secret war hero.


To me, more importantly people presecuted of being gay under past laws will still be alive and pardoning them could make a difference to their lives.

There is much merit in what you say James.


It could be argued that if Alan Turing is pardoned now he loses the 'gay martyr' status which could weaken the cause of how unjust such a law was historically.


Further, a distinction has to be made with your example of WW1 cowardice pardons. All those pardoned are now dead. If Turing is pardoned then everyone convicted under laws against homosexuality logically need to be pardoned. While this may be just, those living who were prosecuted will require compensation for the suffering caused.


This brings us back full circle - where do you stop with such pardons? As mentioned previously, many people were transported for what are now seen as trivial offences

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People executed in WWI for cowardice in the face

> of the enemy have been pardoned.

>

> The difference?


Well, the main difference is that the WWI soldiers have been pardoned because it is believed they suffered from what today would be called Post-Traumatic Stress. It's mitigation, rather than the law being changed.


What you are asking for is a retrospective change. That's very different.

  • 9 months later...
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...