Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly! At least the thread has moved on from debating the merits of throwing the DJs in jail...


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'much better now' is confidential patient

> information in the same way that 'she's dead'

> would have been

"whenever anyone committed suicide an investigation would need to be launched and anyone who may be deemed to have made that person unhappy in anyway should be arrested. Do you hear how insane that sounds!"


Except we know that young people have committed suicide after prolonged episodes of bullying for example, so yes, sometimes the actions of others are huge contributors to the mental wellbeing of individuals.


I saw the DJ's in question on the news today, and they are devastated. They don't need to be dragged over hot coals and thrown in jail too. And I agree with those on who think it's just an unfortunate tragedy.


I also agree that the only issue if there is any, is how a hoax caller managed to get through to anyone able to divulge information about a royal patient. Any patient would be bad enough but the wife of a future king would you'd think, be under extra protection.

Yes agree entirely with your post. That others can harm the mental well-being of others intentionally or unintentionally I think we all can acknowledge (parents, institutions, etc can all be culpable of that). Being criminally culpable for a suicide I think is a very different thing all together though.
Royal confidentiality, if broken, would be deemed as treason. I think treason is still punishable by death in modern british law. The nurses "neglegence" resulted in personal royal details being reported around the world against their will. The nurse was the person who put the call through as genuine. The ward would have assumed the necessary checks were done before putting the call through to the medical team. The nurse may possibly have been seen as the point of origin for the mess, a gatekeeper who's negligence saw the situation spiral out of control. Thats my guess... It's too much of a coincidence she drops dead unexplainably if you ask me

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The DJs were devastated", actually "Gutted" was

> the elegant phrase that they used.

>

> Of course they are gutted, their career is at an

> end and they have to answer questions about their

> conduct. Gutting indeed.


That's a very cynical repsonse to what seemed to me genuine distress from the DJs.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'much better now' is confidential patient

> information in the same way that 'she's dead'

> would have been


I don't think so, not if the press had already been told that "she's much better now". Which they had.

I agree. It's a pretty big leap to assume that just because they are puerile that they wouldn't be disturbed by someone's death. The fact that they did this prank doesn?t suggest that they are sociopaths in and of itself.



DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "The DJs were devastated", actually "Gutted"

> was

> > the elegant phrase that they used.

> >

> > Of course they are gutted, their career is at

> an

> > end and they have to answer questions about

> their

> > conduct. Gutting indeed.

>

> That's a very cynical repsonse to what seemed to

> me genuine distress from the DJs.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The DJs were devastated", actually "Gutted" was

> the elegant phrase that they used.

>

> Of course they are gutted, their career is at an

> end and they have to answer questions about their

> conduct. Gutting indeed.



I think you are being very harsh.


From the BBC


In an interview for Channel Nine's A Current Affair programme, Mr Christian told presenter Tracy Grimshaw: "When we thought about making a call it was going to go for 30 seconds, we were going to be hung up on, and that was it. As innocent as that."


Ms Greig said: "We thought 100 people before us would've tried it. We thought it was such a silly idea and the accents were terrible and not for a second did we expect to speak to Kate - let alone have a conversation with anyone at the hospital. We wanted to be hung up on.''


The pair said they had heard about Mrs Saldanha's death in the early hours of Saturday morning.


"It was the worst phone call I've ever had in my life,'' said Ms Greig.


Asked what his immediate reaction had been, Mr Christian wept and said: "Shattered, gutted, heartbroken and obviously you know. Our deepest sympathies are with the family and the friends.


"Prank calls are made every day, on every radio station in every country around the world, and they have been for a long time and no-one could've imagined this to happen.''


Ms Greig said they had expected to be hung up on and she said: "The accents were terrible. You know it was designed to be stupid. We were never meant to get that far from the little corgis barking in the background - we obviously wanted it to be a joke.


"If we played any involvement in her death then we're very sorry for that. And time will only tell."


Asked about whether she felt there was a "witch hunt" against them, Ms Greig said: "There's nothing that can make me feel worse than what I feel right now. And for what I feel for the family. We're so sorry that this has happened to them."


I hardly think they're being blase about it.

Someone told me that they / the radio station went on promoting the prank after the nurse's death had been reported.


I suspect this is a misunderstanding / deliberate smear based on confusion between the time zones. But since it seems to have been reported it would be helpful if the radio station clarified whether this is true or not.

Of course everyone has sympathy for the family of Jacintha Saldanha, but I feel sorry for the DJs too. IMO they are guilty of nothing more than poor quality broadcasting and juvenile humour. To suggest that they're not genuinely upset at what happened is cynical in the extreme, and completely unfounded.


This may be bullying in your book, but it isn't in mine. Bullying implies aggression or intimidation - there was none. The nurse in question was not even the butt of their joke.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course everyone has sympathy for the family of

> Jacintha Saldanha, but I feel sorry for the DJs

> too. IMO they are guilty of nothing more than poor

> quality broadcasting and juvenile humour. To

> suggest that they're not genuinely upset at what

> happened is cynical in the extreme, and completely

> unfounded.

>



> This may be bullying in your book, but it isn't in

> mine. Bullying implies aggression or intimidation

> - there was none. The nurse in question was not

> even the butt of their joke.


Would agree with this - although I think there was an element of humiliation here in the name of entertainment that is akin to bullying in some ways. I feel sorry for all concerned in the event - what a terrible result :(

I think you're being rather unfair there, MP.


You're definition of 'bullying' is bizarre. Asking someone to put you through a switchboard on false pretences - once - is not bullying.


These people may have been guilty of a childish stunt, but (assuming they are regular human beings) - you're assuming rather a lot to assume only 'crocodile tears' in the face of them being told by the world at large hysterically screaming that they are responsible for someone's death.


There have been a couple of suicides in my personal midst - and in both cases we're talking years of build-up, not a one-off incident. Consider, however, that in both those cases there 'may' even have been a one-off incident that was the final straw. Maybe it was someone being rude to them on a bus. Or honking their horn and shouting at them through a car window. Fortunately, those people don't know the small part they played in someone's demise. How would you feel if you were the last person who tipped someone over the edge - and you knew it? You'd have to be some kind of monster not to feel massive genuine guilt.


Pranking has been a staple of television and radio since television and radio began. How many cases like this? This one. This case is bizarre and exceptional - and it should be treated as such.


Lastly, why do so many people assume that just because someone 'speaks English', the way they present themselves ought to be identical to 'being English'. Australia, like America, is a different country. The language is different. Maybe you don't find their language genuine. I think most people in Oz will.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did someone just suggest the nurse was executed by

> the royal family? Chem trails I tell you.


I met Antique dealer i'm acquainted with yesterday


"the Government did it y'know"


Mind you, he also told me that, "there's a car made completely of hemp, hidden somewhere in a research lab"


"apparently you just fill it with water"


"Oh, so is that why weed is illegal ?" I offered


"EXACTLY..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...