Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Charlotte W - I object to my comments being referred to as "witticisms" !


I was not trying to be funny at all. My points were serious - as serious as they could possibly be, given what you'd written.


You were proposing that people who've made a Billion should be despised.

But with no other reason given than they have more money than you.

So half a Billion and they're in the clear from our hatred ? If they just get HALF a Billion do we, you know, sort of half-hate them ?


Your premise seems weak and unjust. Perhaps like a 15yr old's idealistic view.


Most Billionaires I'm sure have worked at it.


Mainly you get what you work for.


If you're peeved that you're not richer, there may still be time for you to climb the ladder and make something of yourself. Then you can give it all away as you've suggested you would.


But, I was NOT being "witty" !

LOZ

I thought ?money/assets? your words, were wealth which is why I used the word in my response to your original post. If we can send men to the moon, put up satellites to spy on people and build the internet, I don't think it is beyond our ability to find a way to divide up the world's wealth. Unlike you I don't believe that if the world's wealth was distributed equally things would be in 10 years? time roughly the same as they are now. The reason is that many people who suddenly come into a fortune one of the first things they do is buy a home. They may then proceed to buy a car, go on holiday or go travelling, pay for a higher education etc. If everyone received ?30,000 that would give most people the opportunity to buy their own home and what is wrong with that? While ?30,000 may be a considerable sum it is not going to last a lifetime so people would still have to work.



So how would you define wealth then, if not money/assets?


So you think that it is quite possible for someone to think up a way to divide the world's assets evenly, but have no real ideas on how to do it yourself? Nor any thought about the problems such an approach would hit?


You've not really thought this one through, have you?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • WhatsApp Niko - 07818 607583 We've relied on Niko for many jobs; some major, some not so. The thing is, whatever he's done for us, he's been reliable, punctual, fastidious, and tidy. He knows his trade, and he does it really well. These are just a few of the reasons why we and many others recommend him so highly.  Steve & Meg  
    • I am no expert, but are your photos not saved in Google or similar, as well as being on your physical  phone? If so, you should just be able to access them on your new phone without actually having to move them over? Same with emails, normally, you just have to sign into your email account on your new phone to access them? Not sure re contacts, but I don't recall having any problems when getting a new phone. And apps you can just reinstall. Google or something like ChatGPT could probably "talk" you through sorting, deleting and editing photos and emails, if you can't find someone to help (sorry I can't, I'd be too worried about doing something wrong!) Good luck! Don't delete anything from your old phone until you are sure it's on your new phone!
    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...