Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm gutted Amazon are so bad as they make it easy to order Christmas presents, but I refuse to give them any of my hard earned to ship off to Luxembourg.


Even the independents registered at Amazon give a percentage to Amazon, so I might search for my item on Amazon and then google their name to see if they also have another online shop, e.g. eBay.


I agree that the laws have to change and these corporations may not be doing anything unlawful, but their tax affairs are set up in an immoral way which the cuts to frontline services and UK economic stagnation, make it hard to swallow. It might make buying a few Christmas presents more of a pain in the arse, but seeing as how the powers that be, don't have the will to tackle the massive tax loopholes, I will be exercising my consumer power to voice my objection.


It might also be worth noting that the same consumer power has forced Starbucks to rethink their tax dodging ways, so even without a proper change in the law, we can make done difference. I'm sure the PR departments of the worst offenders will be out in force though, making any little concession look like they are moral and ethical.

I?m not saying Amazon is a ?good? company but it?s worth going through some microeconomics I think. Please ignore this long / boring diatribe if you are remotely familiar with any of this.


Before, taking the stance that the government should close (widely used) ?loopholes? in the existing tax law, it?s important to think through the consequences of this. The loopholes are not mistakes or accidental gray areas. The government has intentionally created ways for businesses to reduce / eliminate tax. Most companies will get a tax ruling from the authorities confirming they are interpreting / using the tax code as intended before implementing any tax strategy so there is absolutely nothing underhand going on and in fact the government actively encourages companies to use the tax code to that end. The question is why does the government want to reduce corporate income tax and why don?t they do it in a more straightforward way?


First, real economic profits in any sector are zero from a mirco-economic perspective. This simply means that every business owner (small and large) needs to see a specific return on the money they have invested in their business to think it?s worth their while to operate (rather than sticking the capital in a bond and getting a steady almost risk free income or just spending the money instead).


A reduction in income tax has one of two consequences. In an industry with low barriers to entry and for which competition between firms is significant, a reduction in taxes causes prices to fall and businesses to expand for the following reasons. The reduction of tax (which is a cost) increases profits beyond the minimum return someone running a business requires to engage in that activity. This will attract people to open new businesses and the competition / increase supply of goods and services will drive prices down until profit rate for the sector returns to normal. For sectors that have high barriers to entry / are pseudo monopolistic the lower costs of doing business might result in increased production and lower prices but not to the same extent and potentially not at all which is one of the reasons anti-trust and anti-competition laws are so important.


As you can imagine, the exact opposite happens when taxes increase. Profitability decreases below the minimum level and businesses close until competition reduces to a level at which prices can increase sufficiently to restore profitability (except again for monopolies).


An increase in corporate tax increases the funding of the public sector and reduces the size of the private sector which is a totally reasonable trade-off as there are many things only the government can and should provide to its citizens. However, if by increasing taxes you reduce total economic activity, your actual tax revenue is not going to increase very significantly as there will be less private businesses and less private employment (which depending on what the taxes are used for can be a legitimate trade off). Reducing taxes has the opposite effect (more businesses and private employment and therefore higher income tax receipts etc.) which is why despite the scandals the government is proposing additional tax breaks for small businesses to boost growth.


It?s very easy for governments to sell tax breaks for small companies; however, because people hate ?corporations? the tax authorities sneak these in to the tax code intentionally as ?loopholes? that they carefully explain and encourage businesses to use. As others have already mentioned, most ?evil corporations? are owned by pension funds and insurance companies directly or indirectly and therefore, the reduced profitability of major corporations has additional consequences that need to be considered regarding pensions, annuity rates, the retirement age, insurance premiums etc etc etc.


With that said, buy what you want. Amazon is no angel and if you are convinced you?ve found a company in line with your moral code on most issues support them.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lol, actually, I'm a super-hero, ever since that

> wierd storm.


Another Misfits fan!!! Although I'm not sure I can be arsed now the entire original cast have gone.


PaulK, very helpful contribution there, thanks.

Lol, yes. My teenage daughter got me into it! Compulsive viewing in my opinion :-)



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lol, actually, I'm a super-hero, ever since

> that

> > wierd storm.

>

> Another Misfits fan!!! Although I'm not sure I can

> be arsed now the entire original cast have gone.

>

> PaulK, very helpful contribution there, thanks.

I stumbled across the first series whilst in a drunk / erm "relaxed" state, and got hooked. I think up until this series it's been genuinely really good funny and clever telly. It's probably still good, but now all the original characters have left I just can't really be arsed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...