Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No it was sent to me as a link and I was taken aback that the sender felt it would strike a chord. I left it without comment to see what others thought. About the only thing I agree with is that much of the debate is wrong headed and pointless.


The various issues / incidents / events that led to the Levenson report were illegal and improper under existing laws. The orchestrated campaign to establish a "statutory regulation" to under pin a stronger self regulatory regime might have some, minimal, impact but I don't see it persuading the press to eschew illegality any more post its introduction than before.


I don't like the idea of statutory legislation - however minimal. It does imply some form of licensing by government which I would abhor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...