Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are not enough school places. Schools are having to take turns creating bulge classes often housed in temporary facilities which are straining school resources and resulting in suboptimal learning environments. That there are not enough school places is a mathematical fact. Also, the idea that building schools encourages people to have children is odd. School building right now is only trying to catch up with the demographic reality.
Why crazy? Would you like it to start running with only a reception class? The school will be fully constructed and there are minimum economies of scale for operating the premises. Once up and running for a few years it would be fine, this is just a start up issue. Anyhow, in an ideal world, kids transferring from existing schools to the new school would reduce pressure on schools currently accommodating bulge classes (often in facilities not designed for that purpose).
I think that generally German is a less attractive language than say French is. So maybe if we encourage our children to learn German rather than French then the next generation will be less "vavavavoom" and more "nein, nicht heute Abend" and hopefully finally solve this "problem" of too many prams and children causing havoc around East Dulwich!

Like I said, its a set up issue. It makes no sesne for anyone (including the gov't) to run a school with only a reception class. With your thinking, no new school could ever be set up without running at a massive loss.


No, bulge students won't get priority. But to the extent that there are too many children in the existing schools, moving some out creates room for movement more generally. Ideally, this would help the existing schools but ultimately it might not. Either way, its not an argument against opening the school.

Whichever group/s decide to apply to set-up a new school will decide how they want to do it. It's a 130 page form.

If they choose to just start with reception - highly likely as most owuld start in temporary accomodation - or open classes across year is frankly up to them and the parents that support them.

I feel a little concerned about a hospital site not being used for that purpose. One gets the feeling that NHS services are oversubscribed. We also need to think about protected/social housing for the elderly in the area. Clearly we need to look after the future of our children but a balance needs to be struck and it sometimes feels it tips more in the direction of catering for younger members of the community and less for the elderly and for the physically and mentally disabled.
MP, I would agree with you if this were a temporary issue but it doesn't appear to be. It appears to be part of a growing trend across the city for couples to remain in London when starting families rather than moving further out. If this is the case, it is sensible to adjust services and facilities accordingly.

Local East Dulwich councillors have asked the Harris Federation to deliver one or possibly two primary schools for our area:

http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2012/12/04/new-primary-schools-for-se22/


To make a new free school happen we need 80 families with 1 or 2 year children to state they would consider using a new school/s in 2014 or 2015. Please see attached leaflet.


If you support a new school then please email me your name, children date/s of birth, your post code.

Hi Chillaxed,

It now appears clear that we have increasing demand expected to peek in 2016 for an extra two or three schools in the area.

The German/English school is considering possible sites across Southwark and Lambeth. That lack of certainty about location means we can;t rely upon it being one of the two we need but possibly the third.


Why Harris? 9/10 of its schools are rated outstanding by Ofsted. So an amazing track record of producing outstanding schools. They also are very well connected with the government so if anyone can swing having a 1/5th of the Dulwich Hospital site they can. The second site to the east of East Dulwich gets more interesting. But Harris think they can come up with a practical solution.


So far I have 10 children's families for a new school of the 80 needed for the first school and of the 160 needed for two schools.

Hi Cora,

We're awaiting answers about secondary school demand.

But primary school places are more urgent and locally it was only 3 years ago that the Harris boys secondary school opened. Initially pupils have generally come from out of the area so locally we have sme capacity it would appear.

Really James? That's not what I hear from ED parents who cannot get into Harris. The children coming from out of the area are doing so as a result of banding not because of a lack of local demand.


The strain on primary places began 4 years ago at a time when the local council totally failed to see that it was going to happen and failed to make provision for it, causing enourmous stress for parents that year which has never been as severe since given the pre planning of bulge classes. Those children will be leaving primary in 3 years. There is already a problem with secondary places now, that is going to get worse, i predict that there will be little or no foresight or provision for the local secondary education for those children currently in Y3.


If you are able to provide some information to the contrary i would be grateful.

No, that's the potential non-ED site for the German/English school. I think the idea is there will be 2 new primaries in our local area (one on the hospital site) run by Harris plus potentially the German / English school if they decide to set up in the area based on a similar thread in the family room.




ahoffman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Second possible site is in Rotherhithe, so not v.

> helpful for E. Dulwich.

Well James has said that he thinks Harris has the connections to secure the hospital site. The German / English school have also named the hospital site as a possible location within Southwark so draw your own conclusions. If you read all the threads it appears Harris have a better shot at the hospital site and could open up another school serving Nunhead and the Eastern part of ED if they can show parental demand for two new free school primaries run by them. Between SE22 and SE15 the projected shortage totals 235 so realistically to stop the need for bulges up to 3 new large primaries in the general area would be needed.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1011288,1011807#msg-1011807

I have three boys and no car. My local choices are Charter (unlikely to be close enough for their catchment) and Harris Boys. As I wish them to have a co-educational education I have no local choice and further afield will mainly be penalised because of catchment. The yr3 kids Mrs Lotte talks about will be looking for places in 3yrs - that's not long if we suddenly find a dearth of local secondary places. I think in the past you have suggested that the wealth of single sex girls schools locally means that we need to balance up with single sex ones for the boys which doesn't offer a proper co-educational choice and, in my opinion, penalises boys in particular, as research shows they do better in co-eds whereas girls do better in single sex schools.


I would be really grateful if you could clarify the figures, demand and strategy for local secondary provision. I fear it is a ticking bomb being ignored and I cannot support the use of valuable land/capital for primary places when they will have nowhere to go to six later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Huggers, please can you share the fabulous chiropodist's details?  Huggers, I think podiatrists are the same and podiatrists, pretty much. Why aren't you sticking with the chiropractor, out of interest, if they seem to think the problem is more posture-related than solely (sorry) down to the feet? 
    • Thankyou! Originally I had a private referral ( husband had health insurance at time) and so worn insoles for years but I still wear my shoes down in one place at a ridiculous rate! A fab chiropodist agrees with posture is everything stance. Experienced cobbler says some it ain’t right and I’m over corrected. 
    • I've booked a session with Elmcourt Clinic in West Norwood, recommended by our daughter. A two-week wait for the slot, though.  https://www.elmcourtclinic.co.uk/
    • I don't know everyone else's foot problems are, but I have classic and apparently quite bad deformity - bunions, pain etc. I went to the Woodware Rd practice a few years ago and got orthotics for the not inconsiderable price of £600.  The team there seems very nice but, now that I am experiencing a new type of foot pain, I'm wondering if I've been doing it all wrong these years with supportive trainers and insoles. I'm beginning to realise (seems obvious now) that, if I want to cure my foot pain, maybe I need to change the way I walk, and my posture etc. And also, maybe I need to try barefoot shoes, to build muscle where there's been no need prior, because shoes have been doing all the supporting.  I've been educating myself with Helen Hall and Lawrence van Lingen and addressing my gait seems like a more organic way to solve the problem. Podiatrists will convince you that orthotics and / or surgery are the only way to go, but look up reddit forums and you'll find countless people saying they 'cured' their bunions with barefoot walking / shoes / and exercises.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...