Jump to content

Recommended Posts

stingray Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Err. Not a very busy local food outlet in that

> case - a restaurant would normally dump 10/20

> litres every time it changed the oil in each

> fryer.

>

> Also - you don't pay for removal any more as it

> has value as biofuel - guys drive round trying to

> pinch it from each other.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Its true the oil is collected for free and somtimes peaple pay you to take it away.

Pee gets darker if left standing over time.


Also, it looks darker and more opaque when in a decent-sized bottle than in a narrow stream emerging from your body.


That said I wouldn't totally rule out the cooking oil theory. More likely to be someone who does a lot of deep-frying at home than a business, though.

From the previous thread: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,816118,page=7


[p.7]> After a few sips of one of the dark ones I cam confirm it's definitely urine.


[p.8]>Came across council guy clearing up a nest of bottles just near crawthew. Said they were

>definitely piss containers - taxi drivers main suspects. Said council would welcome information

> on any cars seen dumping bottles.

I had no idea there was a section for witches!!!


Interestingly, here's another excerpt from the internet's vast library of Witch Bottle information.


Modern-Witch-Bottles


Very generally speaking, the modern day Witch-bottles are very similar to historical Witch-bottles in their basic structure, even though their intended purpose has changed. The most common purpose for constructing a Witch-bottle today is capturing negative energies targeted at the constructor of the bottle, her family or her home. Even though some bottles are "mirroring" in nature, they aren't normally built to cause agony to the sender of negative energy/caster of curses. Some Witch-bottles are intended to change negative energy into positive one and then release it into the surrounding area. This kind of bottles could be classified as "guard and protect"-bottles.


If the bottles are of the latter variety, we're looking at a (very) local resident.


I blame Harry Potter!


Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha ha. There's even some debate about whether the

> post has been made in the right section; very

> EDF.

>

> Conveniently, it is the witch bottle maker who

> decides whether the witch bottle works.

>

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wow, there are weirder forums than this one.

> >

> > I love the quotes and derisory lower caps in

> The

> > "non-wiccan" Witch community. Splitters!!!!

> I'm frankly incredulous that after all this time no-one's actually become exasperated enough to stake it out. :D


> I'd have had the longs lens out and cranked the Canon to 6400 ISO months ago!


Wait for the next batch, dust for fingerprints and photograph. If you find any prints common to many of the bottles, voila.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agree with @Sue the Dog is awful-nice building awful food. We like The Rossendale and Watsons
    • There are so many variables. Good chefs can having bad nights, post-Brexit staff shortages, your dish might be brilliant, your friend might order something that's inedible. In the end I think the best option is just to go to the restaurant which has the best overall reviews. If all the reviews are bad then avoid, but even if all the reviews are good that's not a cast iron gaurantee. 
    • The trouble is that pub management and chefs are constantly changing, so what might be fantastic on one occasion  becomes terrible a short time later, and vice versa. Two of the worst pub lunches I've had locally were at the Dog in the village and the Plough, but both those were some time ago. We had an absolutely appalling Christmas lunch on Christmas Day at The Cherry Tree, which was also exorbitantly expensive, so unless their chef (I use the term loosely) has changed, I wouldn't advise eating there. The menu looked amazing. We thought we would treat ourselves. Never again 😭
    • If you've seen the original longer post then you'll know that you've taken that out of context. I don't charge but didn't feel I even needed to say that – you've made it sound like I do charge and that's why I deleted this part of the post saying I don't charge. When I read back what I'd written it sounded like I was defending myself against criticisms that hadn't even been made so i cut it out. And now you've made that kind of criticism anyway I should've left it in.  What do you mean "not charging people to read your reviews of their local restaurants."?  You make it sound like i'm sneaking into SE22 from somewhere else. I live here - they are reviews of my local restaurants!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...