Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry nx. Let?s try again


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2020/07/23/conservative-party-members-stand-boris-would-vote-


Nope. That doesn?t work either. But if I manually paste link to a browser it does


Anyway. Try Googling ?yougov party members Boris?

I found a yougov page that said 3/4 of general Tory membership supported Boris aeons ago but I?m not sure of the point you?re trying to make? General Tory membership do not participate in any vote of confidence and do not draw up any shortlist of two for a new Tory Leader. The general Tory membership I?m sure did not want to see Thatcher ousted but ousted she was (hurrah).


ETA Anyway, thinking about it further, Cummings walking out of no. 10 with a box supposedly containing his belongings was just a very public way of announcing he is now available for new employment and I?m afraid he?ll be receiving a lot of offers, hopefully outside of government.

I'm trying to educate myself: can anyone help? Apart from a string of motifs for t-shirts and kids' phone cases, ...


"Timber Tots promotes children's imagination and interaction

Collect the Squirrel family: The Nut-Nuts!

Include the 4 characters from the Nut-Nut family"


looks like a possible source. Is that likely?


And while I'm here, on my way there I found myself traversing the Mail Online and some lime-green nipple tape. I hadn't realised it came in different colours. Do they signify, or is it simply a personal choice-of-the-day sort of thing?

Meanwhile this greedy piece of hypocrisy is making people on minimum wage pay for the meals of kids whose parents obviously couldn't afford to have them in the first place! As well as depriving several families from purchasing their own homes. Bravo the Daily Mail who actually received criticism for printing the article...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8949391/Campaigning-football-star-Marcus-Rashford-bought-five-luxury-homes-worth-2million.html

The criticism is more about the cack-handed and obvious briefing against Marcus Rashford by this government who would rather blame him for making them look bad and forcing them into a U-turn than their own unwillingness to engage in the issue of meals outside term time when it first came up.


Someone mentioned to me that this was coming (the anti-Rashford briefings) last week and I thought "they wouldn't be so stupid, would they?". Turns out they would.

I did see that he has patented his name in the States, allowing him to use his brand for such thing as 'grooming products' - it all looks rather nefarious to me....


Sorry just using this to show how ludicrous the DM/DH article is. I'm sure we are all aware that grooming products refers to hair and face care.

Boris has gone back into isolation in No10 now it seems after not wearing a mask when meeting an MP (Kay Burley said "Oh Dear" when Hancock suggested they don't wear masks in No10).


Who's going to be the leader without Cummings and Cain. Maybe Allegra Stratton and Carrie Symonds will run the show - they seemed to be the opposition to Cain and Cummings laddish culture..

Since our resident racist doesn't understand the meaning of hypocrisy, here's an example from the same newspaper, another article about a wealthy young footballer doing the sensible and right thing and buying property to protect his and his family's future. The difference being this is portrayed as a positive thing whereas Rashford's isn't. I wonder why?...


Em3vNTTW4AIxB4y?format=jpg&name=small


Yet more hypocrisy, the same newspaper has run positive articles on another, now retired, footballer, Robbie Fowler, who has built up a property empire to such an extent he ended up in the top 100 Rich List, and runs courses at circa ?1k a head to learn how he did it. Clue, he's a wealthy ex-footballer.


A reminder, Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere and billionaire owner of The Daily Mail, pays no UK tax whatsoever because he channels his money through offshore accounts. Here's one of his weekend boltholes...


Em4YepDXcAA2d-3?format=jpg&name=small

ianr Wrote:


>

> And while I'm here, on my way there I found myself

> traversing the Mail Online and some lime-green

> nipple tape. I hadn't realised it came in

> different colours. Do they signify, or is it

> simply a personal choice-of-the-day sort of thing?



Crikey, ianr, many reasons to keep away from the Mail, but are they actually recommending this tape ??!!

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

here's an example from the same newspaper, another article about a wealthy young footballer doing the sensible and right thing and buying property to protect his and his....


In deed, and another selfish young non-specific ethnicity footballer (Tosin Adarabioyo) daring to buy a home. Not sure why they didn't put him in digs with a nice landlady/lord


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5253633/Man-City-footballer-20-25k-week-buys-market-2-25m-home.html


I'll not look any further as it is too easy to expose the DH. Although nipple tapes do sound exciting.

That Phil Foden article was used by Raheem Sterling to highlight how differently the Mail portrayed him and Foden both buying their Mum an expensive house. Foden was portrayed positively, while Sterling was portrayed negatively. Both wealthy young footballers who could afford to do it, only difference being their ethnicity. I'll give the Mail the benefit of the doubt (yeah, I know) that their criticism of Rashford wasn't based on ehnicity, but there's no disputing that articles like that knowingly send a dogwhistle to racists to spout their bile, as witnessed above...

Uncleglen - how come you didn't slag-off the rich white football players buying expensive homes at ?2m EACH, not 'five for ?1.5m' ?!

You'll not have the spine to answer this, so let's just leave the question hanging there...


diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That Phil Foden article was used by Raheem

> Sterling to highlight how differently the Mail

> portrayed him and Foden both buying their Mum an

> expensive house. Foden was portrayed positively,

> while Sterling was portrayed negatively. Both

> wealthy young footballers who could afford to do

> it, only difference being their ethnicity. I'll

> give the Mail the benefit of the doubt (yeah, I

> know) that their criticism of Rashford wasn't

> based on ehnicity, but there's no disputing that

> articles like that knowingly send a dogwhistle to

> racists to spout their bile, as witnessed above...

Sorry to digress again from Cummings but...


How much does it actually cost to feed a kid with a daily lunch by the way? I'm guessing it can't be much. I'm alright with forking out some loose change day to day but what confuses me is how large companies (eg. techs) can enjoy profiting from our infrastructure, paid for by we the people and for generations, without them helping out more on stuff like school meals. Have I misinterpreted the situation? I am I becoming a leftie? Or is it just logic...


I just find it amazing that a few very wealthy people, sometimes based here and usually based everywhere, have become so much more wealthy in 2020 (and because of 2020) and yet we can't give all the kids a bit of simple food. Just seems nuts. And in the long term don't the big corps want healthy customers with a bit of disposable to keep the exchanges going in the future?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...