Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Description of closure:

Goodrich Community Primary School, the part of DUNSTANS ROAD between its junctions with Goodrich Road and Mount Adon Park/Upland Road during term time (Monday to Friday 3:00 pm ? 3:45 pm) which will be physically enforced with traffic signs and the installation of temporary barriers located (i) at a point 1 metre south-west of the south-western kerb-line of Goodrich Road and (ii) at a point 7 metres north-east of the north-eastern kerb-line of Mount Adon Park;

legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Description of closure:

> Goodrich Community Primary School, the part of

> DUNSTANS ROAD between its junctions with Goodrich

> Road and Mount Adon Park/Upland Road during term

> time (Monday to Friday 3:00 pm ? 3:45 pm) which

> will be physically enforced with traffic signs and

> the installation of temporary barriers located (i)

> at a point 1 metre south-west of the south-western

> kerb-line of Goodrich Road and (ii) at a point 7

> metres north-east of the north-eastern kerb-line

> of Mount Adon Park;


Any idea why it is only the afternoon when the other schools streets are morning as well?

The morning drop off has been staggered and the kids are allowed to head straight to their class rooms so the mornings are much less busy which may be why they've gone for afternoon only. In the afternoon despite a staggered pick up it really is very busy and with people trying to socially distance it was becoming dangerous as cars/vans sped down that bit of the road.

So, that's just more traffic pushed onto Upland Road? How very Southwark. I walk my kids to and from school and they go through the gates on Upland Road. Genius.


I'm not defending parents who need or choose to drive their kids to school (one classmate is driven from Dawsons Heights every morning and afternoon!) but this is just nonsense and will directly affect the children using Upland Road.


Is there no one in Southwark's traffic planning division that knows what the f**k they're doing??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
    • SMBs have the best organic porridge oats to make at home.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...