Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To sign this e-petition for a very worthy cause.


http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/29399


SADS can go on undetected, and is something which can affect people aged between 12 & 35 years old. It can be detected by simply having an ECG test.


The Oliver King Foundation was set up following the death of Oliver King, a 12 year old boy who died in Wavertree of SADS.


We call on the Government to introduce defibrillators to all public buildings by 2017, and provide staff with the appropriate training. We also call on the Government to offer all people aged between 12 & 35 a simple ECG test, which could reduce the current death rate of 12 young people a week.


Thank you for reading and hopefully signing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26873-it-only-takes-a-minute-re-sads/
Share on other sites

Whilst I can see the benefits of the proposal, I do wonder about the cost.


There's at least 40,000 public buildings in the UK (because that was how many took part in an energy survey recently).


A defibrillator costs around ?1000 to acquire, and I'm guessing that training at least 3 people to use it at each location would cost an additional ?1000 per venue.


So that would mean that the defibrillator proposal alone would cost at least ?80million in the first year, and probably at least half that every year for refresher training and maintenance.


An annual ECG test for the 15 million people who fall into that age brack will be around ?50 each per annum or around ?750 million pounds annually in total.


So the whole proposal will likely cost around ?800 million per year.


Not only that, but the proposal can't make any estimate about what the impact of those two exercises would be on actual lives saved. That's a hell of a lot of money to spend on guesswork.


Now I know that instinctively everybody will knee jerk respond by saying 'I want that test', but are we absolutely sure that ?800 million per year on healthcare can't be spent more wisely than on what is after all a VERY rare condition.

From the British Heart Foundation website:


It?s very easy to use an AED. The rescuer turns the machine on which then gives voice prompts, telling the rescuer what to do. The rescuer will be asked to put pads into position on the person?s chest. These pads detect electrical activity in the heart and will be able to tell if a shock is needed.


Anyone can use an AED, but it's preferable that people receive training first. It would be better if more people were trained in CPR, which buys time before defibrillation.

Well I guess at almost ?1bn cost, it wouldn't have been met with open arms, not least because there'd be a few questions about whether the proposed solution would have a real impact on lives saved.


For example, what are the odds on the defibrillator proposal given that the victim would have to collapse and be correctly diagnosed in a public building within reach of a defibrillator and a trained practitioner who knew where it was and could implement correctly in the 3 minutes before brain death.


I remember that on the railways a few years back the price of a human life was calculated at around ?4m. In other words investment in safety equipment would have to plausibly save 1 life for every ?4m spent.


If similar maths applied in the SADS world, the proposal would have to save at least 200 deaths a year - which would be a big ask.


So I think the petition is great for publicity, but I fear it would fall short in the real world.

What I was getting at was that we should trust the normal channels. Has it been proposed through the normal channels?


Is everyone who signed the petition either 1) happy to pay the extra tax that this will cost - or 2) accept the shortcomings that would have to be made elsewhere (in the NHS?) to accommodate this additional cost ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...