Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have experience of the Villa school in Camberwell? They have just accepted my daughter for Reception but want a hefty non refundable deposit two months before the Dulwich schools decide on their offers. I love the school but need to see if my child is offered a place to join siblings at another school first. Is it worth gambling ?1500? How has anyone else handled a similar situation?
This is standard practice for all private schools to ask for the deposit well ahead of the state school places being offered. If you are in a position to do so, then you pay the deposit now and forfeit it should you be able to get the state school place that you require.
Thank you for the responses. My daughter is not at all guaranteed a place at her sister's school where there is no sibling policy. I am also interested to hear from anyone with experience of the Villa. I was super impressed but would love to hear from someone who had children there please.

My daughter went to the nursery but not the school. However, we know several people who have children at the school and all are very happy with it. From what I've been told it's a lovely environment, which also does a good job of preparing children for prep school entry exams - if that's the route you want to take.


My only concern would be the size of the classes. A number of children start at the Villa but are then withdrawn if a place at their preferred state school becomes available. For instance, in the current Year One, I understand there are now only three girls in the class. There are obvious academic advantages to this, but it could be quite detrimental from a social perspective, especially if you happen to fall out with one or both of the other girls in the year. With the new extension, I presume they are planning to increase the intake, so this might not be so much of a problem in future years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Anyone got any feedback on Transgender Awareness Week over the last week? I don't. And neither has my wife. And neither have my sisters. And neither has my mum, nor my daughter   x
    • It's an estate that they have been gifted. They may choose to earn a living from it, or to sell all, or part of it. In many cases, the land will only have been purchased as a way to avoid tax (as is the case for people like Clarkson, Dyson and other people with significant land holdings) and has little to do with farming at all. The idea that if I give you land worth £3m + tomorrow Rocks, it's not an massive windfall, but simply a necessary tool that you need to earn a living is silly. It's no different from someone inheriting any other estate where they would usually be required to pay 40% tax and settle up immediately.  If you're opposed to any tax on those inheriting multi-million pound estates - I would be interested in who you would like to place a greater tax burden upon? Or do you simply think we should watch public services collapse even further.
    • Because it's only a windfall if they sell it - until that time it is an asset - and in this case a working asset but, as far a the government is concerned a taxable asset. The farm is the tool that they use to earn a living - a living that they will be taxed on in the same way a nurse is - it's just to do their job they are now expected to pay extra tax for the privilege - just because the farm was passed to them. Or are you advocating nurses pay tax on the tools they are provided to do their job too? 😉  Now, if they sell the farm then yes, they should pay inheritance tax in the same way people who are left items of value from relatives are because they have realised the value and taken the asset as cash.  Our farming industry is built upon family business - generations of farmers from the same families working the land and this is an ideological attack and, like so many of Labour's policies, is aimed at a few rich farmers/farm owners (insert pensioners on Fuel Duty), but creates collateral damage for a whole load of other farmers who aren't rich (insert 50,000 pensioners now struggling in relative poverty due to Winter Fuel) and will have to sell land to fund it because, well, they are farmers who don't earn much at all doing a very tough job - the average wage of someone in agriculture is, according to the BBC around £500 a week and the national average is £671. Do you see the point now and why so many farmers are upset about this? It's another tax the many to get to the few. Maybe farmers should wear Donkey jackets rather than Barbour's and the government may look on them a little more favourably.... Some good background from the BBC on why farmers are fighting so hard. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62jdz61j3yo
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...