Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I heard that Starmer had collided with a cyclist, it wasn't Jezza was it? The Leader of the Labour Party may have been doing a u-turn, something his predecessor generally didn't do.


Which leads me onto today's report on antisemitism and the Labour Party. Corbyn's not great at showing humility. He doesn't quite go to the same level as Livingstone. I suspect that there is a point about the stance of the right wing press (who have had plenty of blood on their hands in earlier times when it comes to tackling fascism). But a sorry for the hurt wouldn't have gone a miss, maybe something even more humble.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/268174-corbyn-and-antisemitism/
Share on other sites

Yes, it is the lack of contrition that is the problem with his comments. Is that a suspending offence? Not sure it is. We shall see how it plays out but there are times where it feels as though Jeremy hasn't quite returned to the backbenches yet in his mind. He seems more willing to give interviews than he did when he was leader too.
He's quite pleased to be going on gardening leave. Spoiler alert, I'm watching HIGNFY (online audience) - that was the fist comment (gardening leave) but some interesting things on other key issues. The programme is hit and miss in terms of connectivity. OMG Hislop has just quoted me.

He's convinced he's in the right, which is fine, but he should just stand back now and let history judge, he doesn't need to keep fighting. There are bigger things going on now.


If he really wants to help either Labour, or the cause of antisemitism, he should accept it's not all about him. More divisive stuff, we really don't need it!

It's obvious why Corbyn etc are antisemitic. (Walking past the cartoon picture on the wall in Tower Hamlets says it all imo)

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/jeremy-corbyn-says-he-backed-antisemitic-mural-on-grounds-of-freedom-of-speech-1.461312


There are about 300,000 Jews in the UK, there are about 2.9 million muslims- plus most of the illegals that have washed up. What better way to endear yourself to one group of voters than by blatantly supporting hatred of their sworn enemy?

Corbyn and his ilk will never alienate the muslims- 80% of them vote Labour after all

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow indeed.....Uncle just sank to a whole new

> level.


Why the outrage?


UG quoted accurate statistics and drew a conclusion that was a fair reflection on the opportunism of politicians. Why should you attempt to condemn UG?.


His opinion was not prejudiced against any ethnic/religious minority. Rather it was an personal observation on the behaviour of politicians.

Plough Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why the outrage?


Because he has previous of extreme right wing views...


Jews are the "sworn enemy" of Muslims? Maybe there's a shade of truth to that in some parts of the world, or amongst some factions, but it is not representative of any British Muslim that I know. Most of whom want to just practice their religion privately and get on with their life.


(Not that I am denying that Islam has more than it's fair share issues, particularly at this current moment in history)


(Neither am I denying that Corbyn and his buddies handled this all EXTREMELY badly)

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you can't see the derogatory and inflammatory

> elements in his comments Plough Man then you are

> as bad as he is.


Why don't you cut him a bit of slack?




He is only exercising his right to free speech. Y'all don't have to gang up on him every time he posts on the forum.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the bigger picture, Corbyn suspended basically

> removes the Labour Party, just when we need an

> opposition to the tories.


Well it arguably splits the party in two. But I am not convinced that the kind of hard left voter who would vote for Corbyn but refuse to vote for Starmer, Miliband, etc (and vote for who instead??) is really a serious force at the polling station. I believe the centrist/swing vote is likely to be much more significant.

Jeremy Corbyn is not anti-semitic.


He didn't say it didn't exist in the Labour party. He said its existence had been exaggerated. Which it has.


YouGov survey of anti-semitism conducted in 2017 shows that the LP was the LEAST anti-semitic of all the parties, even less than when they had a Jewish leader in Ed Miliband two years earlier when they were second least anti-semitic.


Anti-semitism has been abused for political reasons by the media, the Tories and members of the LP as a way of deligitimising Corbyn. Anyone who doesn't realise this should perhaps try reading something other than the Daily Mail once in a while.


Broaden your minds. Educate yourselves.


Oh and by the way, do you know who is anti-semitic? Our Prime Minister.

Plough Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> He is only exercising his right to free speech.

> Y'all don't have to gang up on him every time he

> posts on the forum.



And he doesn't have to lace every comment he makes with an underbelly of bigotry. It is a public forum, and if you want to play the FoS card, others have FoS to call him out every time he posts his in predictable tone.

Bunnybarrow, you like so many are missing the point here. It was Corbyn's response to the report that has got him into trouble. He could have shown contrition, he didn't. He could have addressed the findings on unlawful activity, he didn't. Instead he doubled down, with the typical mantra that has defined the harder left, that it is always someone else's fault. Do I think he will or should be expelled? No, and I don't think the rules even say he should be.


His suspension is about sending a message to the electorate, that the leadership who lost Labour the last election so badly, is not going to be allowed to repeat the exercise next time round. Who cares where the membership stand, or what Len says from his NEC throne? It is the electorate that matters and if Corbyn had paid more attention to that instead of pandering to harder left niche ideals, he may not be sitting where he is now.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you can't see the derogatory and inflammatory

> elements in his comments Plough Man then you are

> as bad as he is.



It's also complete cobblers. Corbyn has been saying the same thing about Israeli and Jewish issues since the 1970s, way before Muslims were ever a material electoral bloc in the UK. Corbyn's whole problem is that he hasn't changed his mins about anything in 40 years and retains the same smug, sanctimonious simplistic views he always has.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Labour seems to be taxing the many to get to the few in so many policies they have implemented. Look at the farmer situation: yes there are some rich farmers but the vast majority are not and they are, in my mind, the very definition of a working person - the very people this country relies upon. Most are family businesses. They were re-running some of the Simon Reeves programmes on the Lake District and it was filmed just after Covid but they featured an 18 year old farmer who was took over his parents farm after they both died of cancer within months of each other. He and his school friends were mucking in to keep the farm going and continue the family business. Today, he would have been hit by a big tax bill too. The challenge is Rachel Reeves' budget desperately needs growth and with the news today that the economy barely grew on, ostensibly, fears of what the budget was going to hit people with and the fact post budget many businesses are saying costs will have to go up due to the increases in employee NI but at the same time saying wage growth, and even jobs, will be impacted we may be heading towards a very nasty perfect storm. Public services desperately need reform not just more money. Wes Streeting said that reform was needed in the NHS and he was talking in a manner more akin to a Tory health secretary than a Labour one!
    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...