Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's manslaughter not murder. I agree that he

> needed to be punished, but I don't think you can

> say that he is 100% to blame for the girl's death,

> she had something to do with it too!


Really Otta?? She was incapacitated, granted by her own actions, but that does not mean he should have allowed the train to move. For whatever reason she was leaning on the train, he should have investigated. He had every opportunity to prevent the tragedy. And didn't.

I think the judge said something along the lines that at the point of the incident it was the guard alone, he as the only person who could have influenced the situation, so he chose to send the train out when it was clear there was a person leaning against the train. He chose to do so when he could have simply not ordered the train to depart.

He chose to send the train off and she died as a result.

Of course not, I'm not implying that at all. My post was more to say what I remember the tone of the judge's comments being, from radio reports I heard. It sounds like the guard was taking being a Jobsworth to an extreme degree and his belligerence cost the girl her life.

Here's an account of the sentencing: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2012/11/16/judge-tells-christopher-mcgee-georgia-varley-paid-with-her-life-for-your-actions-100252-32247466/2/. There's a good cross section of readers' comments too.


There are several other reports in that paper, each with links to some of the othrs. Here's one. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/2012/11/07/friend-of-tragic-wirral-teen-georgia-varley-tells-court-of-her-final-hours-100252-32180383/


I find it difficult to know what to make of the sentence without having seen all the video evidence. I do wonder whether the knowledge that there _was_ a death might possibly be an influence on the assessment of the level of risk of the guard's action; but I really don't know. I wouldn't in any case be surprised to see an attempt to appeal against at least the sentence. It's also very difficult to make comparisons, but here are some details of sentences in other convictions on the same charge. These I found from online press reports.. I wasn't able to find this degree of analysis in any of the online sets of official statistics.


2008, 3.5 years, DP Johnson, Roofing contractor. Homeowner died day after work done, from CO fumes from a boiler that now had no effective flue after chimney rebuilding.


2011, D Bell, pub landlord, repeated failure to ensure a cellar door secured. A customer fell into it, and was found dead there three days later. Two years.


2006, "hands on" company director, often worked on factory floor. Worker killed using a machine, one of three whose safety cutouts had been disabled on installation. Mitigating factors led to two years, suspended. Court of Appeal replaced this with 15 months immediate.


2012 Gas fitter incorrectly secured flue when installing domestic boiler. 3 years.


2003 Misra and Srivastava, two SHOs. Negligent post-operative care of a patient led to death from SA infection. Each, 18 months suspended.


1998 Hospital doctor administered adrenaline injection, against strong advice of three colleagues, to a Px in intensive care after septic shock. Px died from a heart attack. 6 months suspended.


2004 Narendra Sinha, Locum GP administered gross morphine overdose. 15 months.


[Edited: para.3 "the jury's assessment" -> "the assessment"]

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course not, I'm not implying that at all. My

> post was more to say what I remember the tone of

> the judge's comments being, from radio reports I

> heard. It sounds like the guard was taking being

> a Jobsworth to an extreme degree and his

> belligerence cost the girl her life.



Hi KK, my post wasn't directed at you mate.

This was a case of gross negligence manslaughter, so the seriousness assessment will involve taking account of the nature of the duty of care that was breached, the degree of causation between the breach and the death, and the degree of negligence. In this case, the duty was specific - the guard's job is to ensure passenger safety. The causation was absolute - the negligent act was the complete cause of death (the fact that the victim was drunk explained why she was leaning against the train in the first place, but not why she fell when it moved off). And the degree of negligence was also very serious, given the training and experience of the defendant and the ease with which he could have done the right thing.


On that basis, this was a bad case. Add to that no credit for a guilty plea (which is a proper factor to take into account) and the fact that he appears to have been caught out lying by the CCTV (which is not strictly relevant but is likely to have some impact on the mind of the judge) and five years is an understandable sentence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...