Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Harsh yes because she was 3 times over the drink drive limit (at age 16?)and she had mephedrone in her system and was obviously oblivious to the train moving- sympathies to her family but if she had been compos mentis she probably would have been able to stand up straight as soon as the train started to move- there is a clear photo from cctv showing her.

The girl was not leaning against a moving train. The train was not moving until the guard blew the whistle for the driver to move it. It was his job to make sure the train was clear of people. If you see the pictures the platform was not busy.


She got off the train and then, realizing the wrong stop, turned and leant against the window while the train was stationary. The guard then blew the whistle for it to move.


It doesnt matter if she was drunk-the guard is there to stop the train moving until it is clear of people whether they are drunk, blind, deaf, not concentrating, pushed forward or crowded by others, disorientated, elderly, young- that's his job.

Why did he do this? the jury found him guilty and the judge gave him a serious sentence so i assume they suspect he did see her and he was trying to 'give her a fright'.

Aye, Huggers, if he did it to 'teach her a lesson' then fair cop, but as far as I know that wasn't the judge's reasoning; rather that he ought to have realised she was drunk and therefore not let the train go. And yes TED he's paid (poorly I'm sure) to keep people from danger, but one mistake and you're in the clink for 5 years?
He didn't need to realize she was drunk, he needed to realize the train was still in contact with a passenger- who could have been drunk, slow, disabled.....it wasn't about judging the state of someone but the position of someone in relation to the train.
Yeah let him off he was only NOT doing his job. I mean Airline Pilot who crashes his plane - only one mistake, Surgeon removes the wrong lung - only one mistake, Pharmacist only kills one patient for heavens sake why should we expect anyone to be responsible for ANYTHING

Got off the plane at Gatwick late one night, just myself and three small girls, and went down to the station to catch a train home.


The train arrived, one of the little girls got on and stood in the door waiting for us, while I picked up baggage and the other two younger children.


But before the rest of us could board, the guard blew his whistle and the train left carrying one 10-year-old, all alone with no phone, money or ID.


When I confronted the guard, oh no, nothing he could do, it was just one of those things. He didn't deny that he had done wrong. Basically he shrugged, he couldn't be bothered, and he knew that I'd be too frantic with trying to find my child to take it out on him.


Luckily my story has a happy ending, but through no fault of the guard or his colleagues.


I was reminded of that experience when I read this story and I wonder at the people who are trying to find excuses for this guard.

About 18 months ago I saw a guard at London Bridge signal a train to move in what looked to be a deliberate attempt to frighten a person who seemed to be trying to delay the train's departure by standing with one foot in the door . The guard had been arguing with the bloke moments before he signalled .

I don't know if the chap was drunk /confused /whatever , but it was very very hairy - everyone on the platform was screaming and the chap was running along with the train with his clothing snagged in the door . Somehow he managed to get free .

I've happily cycled round both Victoria Station and London Bridge when drunk 15 or 20 years ago. Lovely surface, but a touch of water on and splat you are on the floor. Passengers rush to your attention and all rather embarassing. So who hasn't done daft things when pissed. Didn't deserve to die for it though.

The judgement was a very clear notice that the train guard knew EXACTLY what he was doing. It wasn't made by a judge, it was made by a jury.


That decision was made by 12 completely normal people who are just like all of us, except that they had heard the evidence. We haven't.


So with all due respect, worker, you're making a call on something you know very little about.

Discrepencies in punishments for comparable crimes are a seperate issue though. The only issue here is whether or not a deliberate or neglectful act by the accused caused or led to the death of this woman. As someone has written above, a jury considered the evidence and decided it had. At that moment, the role of a train guard is to ensure it is safe for a train to leave a platform. And this tragic incident highlights just why there are guards on trains and platforms doing exactly this task. To be fair, his sentence is in line with drivers who cause death through dangerous driving, so perfectly reasonable in my view.
Also I hope it sends a clear message about personal responsibility and culpability to every moody bus driver who takes off impatiently before a woman and her toddler are properly on the bus (or actually separated and one left behind as happened to a friend in Lordship Lane with a driver immune to her entreaties), to every bus driver who slams on his brakes in a road ragey way while people are trying to get down the stairs, who chases down cyclists down bus lanes, as well as those who are responsible for our lives on trains and platforms.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair the jury didnt sentence him. The judge

> did and there's nothing intrinsically wrong with

> debating sentencing policy. But he was guilty and

> deserved punishnent. Whether prison is right is

> correctly another debate



Indeed. I think the punishment is harsh, but he deserved to be punished.

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also I hope it sends a clear message about

> personal responsibility and culpability to every

> moody bus driver who takes off impatiently before

> a woman and her toddler are properly on the bus

> (or actually separated and one left behind as

> happened to a friend in Lordship Lane with a

> driver immune to her entreaties), to every bus

> driver who slams on his brakes in a road ragey way

> while people are trying to get down the stairs,

> who chases down cyclists down bus lanes, as well

> as those who are responsible for our lives on

> trains and platforms.



Too true, I have asked cab drivers several times not to use their mobile when I am in their cab, another time was in a cab when the driver fell asleep and mounted the island in the middle of the road,he then thought it would be ok to continue the journey I insisted he let us out and phoned the cab company to get another cab and when I refused to pay they had the cheek to argue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...