Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This bit of Goodrich is different. It was narrowed by half FOR SAFETY years and years ago. Since then traffic has grown and the lorries are heavier, more frequent and more likely to come down not knowing IT?S HALF WIDTH. How?s that for SAFETY?

Also, the school told the council it didn?t have the resources to manage a barrier, which I think is fair enough.

Anyway, it?s in someone else?s hands now higher up than council level. Watch this space!

Brakes are the food of the devil and responsible for the same pub meals from Cornwall to Cumbria. As they are owned by an American firm they will be one of the first to sell chlorinated chicken. Surely in ED schools can get their food delivered by cargo bike or simply grow their own. Disclaimer, these comments are purely in jest.

Our collective views on Brakes as a company aside (Malumbu I share you thoughts entirely - how dare schools not be using cargo bikes ;-)) - this is not a huge lorry trying to find it's way around the backstreets using Waze it is a lorry delivering (I presume the school meals) to the school that now has nowhere to stop due to the bollards that have been put in in front of the school, I presume these bollards are a pre-cursor to the Goodrich closure being put in?


Did Goodrich ever agree to the measures that are about to go in? I heard they said to the council that they weren't what the school wanted - or was that because the gate would need to be manually operated by someone from the school?

Southwark Cyclists? tracker, which I came across earlier, says plans have changed. There was a decision made in favour of closure but no TMO seems to have been put in place. There is another batch of schools streets due to be announced so could be in that.


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1eBxvYUYgFti9qYPZtl8FX0jTs74CnFHqaOKLk4UAwgw/htmlview

legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Southwark Cyclists? tracker, which I came across

> earlier, says plans have changed. There was a

> decision made in favour of closure but no TMO

> seems to have been put in place. There is another

> batch of schools streets due to be announced so

> could be in that.

>

> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1eBxvYU

> YgFti9qYPZtl8FX0jTs74CnFHqaOKLk4UAwgw/htmlview



Wow.....that's a well organised lobby group. Difficult for residents to work out what's going on but Southwark Cyclists have all the answers.....I wonder how they get such detailed info.....hmmmmmmm.....?????


Has anyone dug a little deeper looking at how intertwined these lobby groups are with the council? We know they are being consulted on every closure but does it go further than that?

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Also, the school told the council it didn?t have

> the resources to manage a barrier, which I think

> is fair enough.


It's one of the largest (if not the largest) primary schools in the borough -- how can they possibly not have the resources ? Especially given every other school nearby seems to manage it. And, in any case, if child safety is the priority, then they ought to be helped to find those resources !


> This bit of Goodrich is different. It was narrowed

> by half FOR SAFETY years and years ago. Since then

> traffic has grown and the lorries are heavier,

> more frequent and more likely to come down not

> knowing IT?S HALF WIDTH. How?s that for SAFETY?


And where do you expect these heavy lorries to go ? Down the other two sides of the school, where the main entrances lie ? So it's fine to have children endangered, just as long as the traffic isn't going past your front door ?

Presumably the idea is to "re-educate" the parents from Alleyns who use Townley road when dropping kids ?


With a secondary objective of income from all the PCNs, guessing council finances are in dire straits due to Covid ?

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow.....that's a well organised lobby group.

> Difficult for residents to work out what's going

> on but Southwark Cyclists have all the

> answers.....I wonder how they get such detailed

> info.....hmmmmmmm.....?????

>

> Has anyone dug a little deeper looking at how

> intertwined these lobby groups are with the

> council? We know they are being consulted on every

> closure but does it go further than that?


I heard Southwark Cyclists hosted the last Bilderberg Group meeting at which COVID was planned.

Haha- I think you?re onto something there.


Alternatively maybe they just read all the documents published by Southwark..


It?s definitely one of those things though, just hard to work out which!



Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rockets Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wow.....that's a well organised lobby group.

> > Difficult for residents to work out what's

> going

> > on but Southwark Cyclists have all the

> > answers.....I wonder how they get such detailed

> > info.....hmmmmmmm.....?????

> >

> > Has anyone dug a little deeper looking at how

> > intertwined these lobby groups are with the

> > council? We know they are being consulted on

> every

> > closure but does it go further than that?

>

> I heard Southwark Cyclists hosted the last

> Bilderberg Group meeting at which COVID was

> planned.

northernmonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha- I think you?re onto something there.

>

> Alternatively maybe they just read all the

> documents published by Southwark..

>

> It?s definitely one of those things though, just

> hard to work out which!

>

>

> Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Rockets Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Wow.....that's a well organised lobby group.

> > > Difficult for residents to work out what's

> > going

> > > on but Southwark Cyclists have all the

> > > answers.....I wonder how they get such

> detailed

> > > info.....hmmmmmmm.....?????

> > >

> > > Has anyone dug a little deeper looking at how

> > > intertwined these lobby groups are with the

> > > council? We know they are being consulted on

> > every

> > > closure but does it go further than that?

> >

> > I heard Southwark Cyclists hosted the last

> > Bilderberg Group meeting at which COVID was

> > planned.



Ha ha...if they have managed to find and read all the documents by themselves they deserve a medal as Southwark doesn't make it easy to find the information.....;-)



Perhaps during one of their regular "Are you happy with these road closures/how would you like us to amend our road closures our great and magnificent cycling group" consultation meetings they slipped them a brown envelope, winked and said...that's where we have hidden the documents we don't want the constituents to find!!! ;-)

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> northernmonkey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Haha- I think you?re onto something there.

> >

> > Alternatively maybe they just read all the

> > documents published by Southwark..

> >

> > It?s definitely one of those things though,

> just

> > hard to work out which!

> >

> >

> > Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Rockets Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Wow.....that's a well organised lobby

> group.

> > > > Difficult for residents to work out what's

> > > going

> > > > on but Southwark Cyclists have all the

> > > > answers.....I wonder how they get such

> > detailed

> > > > info.....hmmmmmmm.....?????

> > > >

> > > > Has anyone dug a little deeper looking at

> how

> > > > intertwined these lobby groups are with the

> > > > council? We know they are being consulted

> on

> > > every

> > > > closure but does it go further than that?

> > >

> > > I heard Southwark Cyclists hosted the last

> > > Bilderberg Group meeting at which COVID was

> > > planned.

>

>

> Ha ha...if they have managed to find and read all

> the documents by themselves they deserve a medal

> as Southwark doesn't make it easy to find the

> information.....;-)

>

>

> Perhaps during one of their regular "Are you happy

> with these road closures/how would you like us to

> amend our road closures our great and magnificent

> cycling group" consultation meetings they slipped

> them a brown envelope, winked and said...that's

> where we have hidden the documents we don't want

> the constituents to find!!! ;-)



...and then went and published it on the internet so that anyone could access it, for free?


It is genuinely weird to see people (who are presumably otherwise sensible, average human beings) making up conspiracy theories about a local traffic scheme in suburban London.

Many thanks DKHB.. your erudite contribution to this debate is so welcome!


Anyway, back to business...see how Cllr Newens grandstands to her neighbours how she is working to get traffic out of the village quicker to cause congestion on EDG and onto Lordship Lane....hurrah, she says, now the problem is Cllr McAsh's...


She doesn't seem too keen to engage people in a debate about the displacement....see some of the comments..


JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> legalalien Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's Southwark Council - if you have a look at

> the

> > last few pages of the "our healthy streets"

> thread

> > there are links to relevant documents. There is

> a

> > further council meeting about it today.

>

> The money is coming from central government and is

> also part of the terma of the bailout - however

> much some councils welcome them.

>

> It seems to be a cross party plan


It seems to me that these measures, along with Congestion Charge changes, are the Tory's plan to make Londoners disillusioned with Labour Councils. I was appalled when I saw BJ on TV saying that the funding crisis in TfL was down to the present mayor's mismanagement. He later retracted the statement, but the lies show the intent.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I turned right into Townley Road from East Dulwich Grove today. Have I missed something here?


Southwark has not implemented the phase 2(?) measures yet and, even when they do you will still be able to turn right from EDG into Townley. If they are consistent and keep north and south bound symmetrical this means they will probably introduce a phase 3 to divert traffic along EDG and LL by closing off that right turn (as per the OHS proposals) but this has not happened yet. I guess the residents and business's on EDG and LL will be keeping their fingers crossed this will be delayed as long as possible.

So basically we/ van drive down Townley, avoiding fines, between 10am - 3pm.

Has anyone tried/tested this pls ?

Just don't wanna get caught-out later..


wallsend Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 8-10 and 3-6

>

> But you can always travel in the opposite

> direction to the cameras of course.

yes you will be able to.


Not sure the cameras are in yet anywhere - Cllr Newens is putting pressure on TFL to get them in this week in the Village but nothing had gone in this morning.


I suspect TFL will be needing to look at how road signage will need to change in other places as they need to ensure people are aware of the closures - for example, you have to alert traffic on the A205 signage that there are going to be times when you now can't get through the Village.


Cllr Newens will be desperate for these to go in before the school return as it will likely be chaos if they go in in the middle of a school week.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
    • There are teachers who have extensive experience of working with children with SEN but cannot access training to become SEN assessor (sorry cannot think of the correct title - senior moment ) as schools do not have the budget to undertake this. 
    • In certain cultures, it is the norm to have a period of singing at certain times after a death.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...