Jump to content

Recommended Posts

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keep it.

>

> I have yet to wait less than 15 minutes in the big

> LL one

>

> Even the great Satan and its hapless servants of

> international capital - the USA - views its postal

> service as an untouchable, yet we are happy chop

> it up at the first opportunity



Snorky, you can't resist spewing anti-American sentiments, now can you????

if a Post Office can't make money why should tax payers subsidise it? (difficult concept for politicians to get their nonces round I know).......especially in London where there's plenty of nearby alternatives. You could, maybe, just, make acse for stte support in an isoltaed community.

The problem is that the people who use the PO most are invariably at the bottom of the pile economically and likely have less of a voice.


I dont really used the PO apart from sending stuff I send out to paying victims, but many many people have no choice - the money that they live on goes tho' the PO.


You also cant estimate the non monetary value of somewhere like a PO in terms of a loose social network for people on ther margins - although this is more important in isolated areas as you say.

Libraries - rationliasation, yes, hospitals (increasingly questioning but far too complex than to no state subsidy but certainly would like a more commercial focus) parks - no, museum no, schools no. Police - I'd happily see local beat type monitoring run by a private agency leaving the highly paid police to get on with dealing with proper crime not issuing parking tickets and 'easy' crime, armed forces - no. There's a degree of simplification in these responses but how the sacred cowiness off state owned and run businesse should be questioned thoroughly and constatntly....


How many post offices are there in ED? Where else can I buy stamps? Open bank accounts? etc etc

Yes Rose, there are fewer post offices in the states than there are here, and have less services on offer. I feel it would be unfortunate to lose another PO here as they provide so much for the community. When the PO on Wood Vale shut a few years ago it forced people back into their cars, which either means we are all lazy or we were driving the elderly to the nearest one. Also mothers and children now have to find another means of transport apart from walking, defeating the whole purpose of trying to help the environment.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So a post office on every corner it is

> then..........


*shakes head at another deliberate misrepresentation of other people's statements and opinions and that strange need to mention "bookies" in every thread.*


-------------------------------------------------------

> if a Post Office can't make money why should tax

> payers subsidise it?


Would you apply that argument to libraries, hospitals, parks, museums and schools? How about the police and armed forces?



Are you suggesting that the police and armed forces should be privatised? Interesting idea.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if a Post Office can't make money why should tax

> payers subsidise it? (difficult concept for

> politicians to get their nonces round I

> know).......especially in London where there's

> plenty of nearby alternatives. You could, maybe,

> just, make acse for stte support in an isoltaed

> community.


I agree - if the post office is the only shop in a rural village then fair enough, but round the corner from another branch in suburban London??


I always struggle with the point of the post office anyway (parcels excepted); most things they used to have a monopoly on can be done easier elsewhere (post, phone, online, at the bank, newsagents etc....) and the things they now promote are just services that loads of other companies do (travel insurance, currency exchange, broadband, credit cards etc)


I know you could argue that if the government(s) hadn't taken their monopolies away then it would be different, but you could also argue that if the government hadn't allowed the gas and electricity industries to expand then the coal industry would be in better shape; or if BT hadn't been privatised then the post office could still make a nice profit from forcing us to wait 6 months for a brown telephone and a shared 'party' line - things move on and the only unique selling point for the post office now is somewhere to take parcels imho

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Party lines were such fun for eavesdropping!



true - we shared one with Nan (slightly scary Yorkshire matriarch) who threatened to 'tan my hide' for listening in when I was about 5

As far as I am concerned, ALL post offices should be closed. No need to buy postage from them as you can print your own online.Letters can posted in post-boxes. Money can be transferred to bank accounts and collected from ATM.Everything else can be done at news-agents who are much more efficient,friendly,profitable. The sad people to whom social life means standing in a post office queue should look for a new hobby,or go back to the ballet school and jump. Post Offices are dinosauruses..Keep a few in museums and get rid of the rest.

Keep the PO in Melbourne Grove, definitely. If it goes, LL will obviously get even busier and at the moment Melbourne Grove is a godsend for those of us who:


1) are freelance or otherwise working from home and without access to an office-based post room

2) often post items larger than a normal letter (and who often rely on being able to do so in order to earn a living)

3) send presents to non-local friends or family, using a cheaper form of delivery than a courier that also offers signature on receipt

4) have active toddlers in tow much of the time and find it difficult to keep said toddler entertained in the LL PO queue for 15 minutes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...