Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Forumites,


I have heard mixed reviews about Oakfield School but have taken the view that different things are important to different people. Recently though I have heard parents have taken their kids out of Oakfield as they are unhappy with the school. Would any parents this applies to be willing to share their views with me?


Many thx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26689-oakfield-school/
Share on other sites

My understanding is that parents have taken places as unsure about local state places, but if these came through later, then they have taken children out.


Yes, there have also been depatures further up the school in Years 3, 4 & 5 as well for a variety of reasons including several people moving out of the area.


The school has had 4 Head Teachers in the last 6 years and the school has undoubtedly been through a lot of change, however, the current Head Teacher is very good and is slowly dragging the school in the right direction. The Deputy Head, who was much liked by children and parents, left under a cloud very suddenly just over a year ago and hasn't been replaced.


My main area of concern is the overall quality of teaching. Some teachers are very,very good, however, some are less than average. I think, however, that this is gradually being handled by the new head teacher. Generally, there does seem to be a large turnover.


As a parent, if I had my time again, I would look for a prep that had much closer links to a senior school. The school has been critised by parents in the past by not getting enough children to the 'top' Senior Schools ( DC, JAGS, Alleyns etc ). If this is your goal, then this needs to be given serious consideration. They do well in getting children into Whitgift, Trinity, St Dunstan's etc. though.


However, my children have been happy there ( though my current year 6 is feeling the pressue- which does not come from me - hence my comments above about senior schools ).


Hope this helps.

Hi,


My child was at Oakfield last year in the Lower Foundation but we decided to leave at the end of the year for several reasons. It was a hard decision because he had made lovely friends and we had also become close friends with many of the parents in his class. I think the parents and other children are very friendly at Oakfield which made us feel very sad to leave. I also think the school offers a very good education for the fees. We really appreciated the fact that they used the 15 hours of free government educational funding to be able to reduce the tuition for those who were under 5. We also liked the diversity within the student body.


Our main reason for leaving was what was already mentioned, we were concerned about the relatively low numbers being offered places at the local more academically selective school. For example, there was only one place offered at Alleyns last year. Parents with older children at the school also reported that the quality of teachers varied widely especially after Year 2. We also felt that the school didn't value music, drama or sports in the same way as schools like Herne Hill or Dulwich Prep. The teacher my son had was also rather strict and didn't seem to understand the developmental differences between the 'summer babies' like my son who was born in August and the Sept born children. She also didn't seem to think much about the importance of the child being given time to settle in the school. He was anxious on the first day and I was horrified to learn that the school's settling in policy was just for the parents to leave them quickly. I was not allowed to walk him to the cloakroom or sit in the classroom the first day even for a few minutes which I knew would have helped tons. The assistant teacher pulled him off of me screaming, 'Mummy, I'm scared. Don't leave me!'He was also too afraid to ask to go to the toilet so had lots of accidents at the start of the year and even though I asked the teachers to take him regularly to the toilet, they ignored this request and said he needed to learn to ask to go when he needed to. I felt his teacher was pushing kids into being independent too quickly instead of giving them the extra support they needed to feel secure at the start.


There was a feeling that the new Head was making the right changes to turn the school around and improve its academic reputation but we decided to change our son to a different school which was a feeder into the more academically selective local schools and placed more emphasis on the importance of being well rounded in terms of music, the arts and sports.We are now happy that we made that decision as we really love his current school but we still miss his friends at Oakfield and the parents we had met there.


We really liked Oakfield at the end of the year and really hope the new Head sticks around to give the school stability and to change its academic reputation so children can get in to the more academically selective schools if they wish too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...