Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday the council published a bunch of TMOs which give effect to road closures including the closure of Peckham rye eastside (and the associated right turn onto East Dulwich Road), as well as those in Townley / Burbage road etc.


Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/traffic-orders-licensing-strategies-and-regulation/traffic-management-orders?chapter=5


No doubt this will have an appalling impact on the residents around Barry Road / Forest Hill road on the east of our community.


The Dulwich Village changes may actually improve conditions in East Dulwich Grove, but other people will pay the price for that.

Wow, they come in force next Thursday I wonder if that means all the roads get closed then or whether it permits them to install them anytime between Thursday and when they expire. This will be the death knell for these plans as they will cause such chaos that the council will have no option but to remove them all.


I wonder if Cllr McAsh sent his "we're listening" blog as he knows the closure of DV will improve EDG and move the problem off his ward and onto someone else's.....hmmmmmm....


Rahrahrah - feel free to lobby admin to remove this thread as you do every time you read something you don't like! ;-)

Oh great - more people to be treated like second class residents by the council. If anything good is to come out of it is that the Labour will lose hold over Southwark - or at least will have to share - after the next local election.

ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh great - more people to be treated like second

> class residents by the council. If anything good

> is to come out of it is that the Labour will lose

> hold over Southwark - or at leas will have to

> share - after the next general election.


You mean local elections I think :)


Edit: and labour have the advantage in the next ones IIRC (due to the weakness of the Liberal Democrats nationally at present) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwark_London_Borough_Council_elections

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ab29 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh great - more people to be treated like

> second

> > class residents by the council. If anything

> good

> > is to come out of it is that the Labour will

> lose

> > hold over Southwark - or at leas will have to

> > share - after the next general election.

>

> You mean local elections I think :)


Oops yes - just corrected it:) Truly p****d off today ;)

ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ab29 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Oh great - more people to be treated like

> > second

> > > class residents by the council. If anything

> > good

> > > is to come out of it is that the Labour will

> > lose

> > > hold over Southwark - or at leas will have to

> > > share - after the next general election.

> >

> > You mean local elections I think :)

>

> Oops yes - just corrected it:) Truly p****d off

> today ;)


LOL - I feel the same this week - horrible - just checked the figures and the Liberal Dems need to get a revival nationally to mount a comeback here in 2022 IMHO.


I don't think the Tories have much of a base in Southwark but you never know these days.

I don't think the Tories have much of a base in Southwark but you never know these days.


Maybe it's another red wall due to fall, but I suspect that the wealthy middle class socialists who live in London will be the last to give up on 'never vote Tory'. On the other hand, I would certainly consider voting for an independent standing on a 'Dulwich for Dulwich people' ticket. Or indeed a Camberwell ticket, since joining the boroughs was in my view a huge mistake. Indeed, any candidate who was prepared to put the wishes of the majority of their potential constituents first, and not a party ticket, might get my vote.


Should we ever be allowed to vote again. Or will our councillors now be councillors for life, as the Mayor appears to be?

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think the Tories have much of a base in

> Southwark but you never know these days.

>

> Maybe it's another red wall due to fall, but I

> suspect that the wealthy middle class socialists

> who live in London will be the last to give up on

> 'never vote Tory'. On the other hand, I would

> certainly consider voting for an independent

> standing on a 'Dulwich for Dulwich people' ticket.

> Or indeed a Camberwell ticket, since joining the

> boroughs was in my view a huge mistake. Indeed,

> any candidate who was prepared to put the wishes

> of the majority of their potential constituents

> first, and not a party ticket, might get my vote.

>

>

> Should we ever be allowed to vote again. Or will

> our councillors now be councillors for life, as

> the Mayor appears to be?


Yes it's hilarious- if you walk around Dulwich Village and the roads around it at election time all the houses belonging to doctors etc who send their kids to the private schools all have Labour posters in the windows!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...