Jump to content

Tighter restrictions/ second national lockdown aka circuit breaker?


Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit that

> makes it more unique than all those events cited

> above. Life, as well as politics, is full of ifs,

> buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but from

> the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab project, so no one should

> be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab Gov...


Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty opinionated blinkered twats who are too tight to pay the going rate for building work etc and just sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and are totally unaffected by what is going on in poorer areas .

What was the point of giving loads of money to those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120 bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us. All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by the Brussels morons in some sort of division of assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG TIME.

Since being in or out of the EU does not affect you whingeing morons you should shut up!

In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

?1 million homes ?

Oh I see, you're aiming that comment at the little people.


A mere ?1 million is basically a flat in East Dulwich nowadays, isn't it ?


Out of interest UG, what's your perceived value of your house ?

Presumably about 89p, the way you seem to have a grudge against those with only ?1 million.


(accidentally sent the above as a PM. Sorry UG, was meant for all, not yours alone)


uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit

> that

> > makes it more unique than all those events

> cited

> > above. Life, as well as politics, is full of

> ifs,

> > buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but

> from

> > the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab project, so no one

> should

> > be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab Gov...

>

> Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest

> of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty

> opinionated blinkered @#$%& who are too tight to

> pay the going rate for building work etc and just

> sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and

> are totally unaffected by what is going on in

> poorer areas .

> What was the point of giving loads of money to

> those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120

> bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to

> spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us.

> All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by

> the Brussels morons in some sort of division of

> assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG

> TIME.

> Since being in or out of the EU does not affect

> you whingeing morons you should shut up!

> In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 2. If there had been no Falklands War there would

> be no Thatcher in 1983 and we would have had the

> experiment of the third way (the SDP)


Interesting list of 'what ifs' but this is one of those truisms that turns out not to be true. A few years ago I looked through detailed polling and voting info from Ipsos MORI for 1981-83 and here's the summary:


1. Labour were not miles ahead in the polls before the Falklands War broke out in April '82. In early '81, at the depths of the recession, they were at least 10% ahead in the polls, but by Dec '81-Feb '82 (two months before the War started), the lead was down to between 0 and 3% and their average poll rating was 31% - barely 3% more than their eventual showing in the '83 general election and less than the 33-36% they were polling from October '82 to Feb '83.


2. The 'Falklands factor' theory ignores the huge impact of the SDP / Alliance on the years from '81 to '83. Between November '81 and the outbreak of the war, the combined Alliance polling was between 30 and 44%, but after this honeymoon period it was the Tories who benefited from a decline in Alliance support rather than Labour. There's no evidence that this had anything to do with Falklands.


3. The economy (in GDP terms) was picking up from the depth of the '80-'81 recession and by early '83 was showing strong growth. Despite their best intentions, many people vote with their wallets and Thatcher benefited from this in '83.


4. Labour did not put up a credible platform for voters outside their core constituencies, without which they couldn't hope to win power.


Now back to the pandemic...

Where to begin?

We're at the stage where Johnson needs to go and we have a Gov of National Unity. The current Tory party is incapable of governing on its own, it's purged what decent experienced politicians it had over Brexit, and we're now left with a cabinet of the all the talentless.

And a reminder that in less than 9 weeks we exit the Brexit transition period, a time set aside for Gov and business to get everything ready for being outside the single market and the economic hit to the economy that will entail on top of the Covid costs, yet business still doesn't know what this 'oven-ready' deal will finally look like. A refusal to extend this period during a global pandemic is tantamount to gross negligence, a complete lack of duty of care to the well-being of this country and it's citizens...

They seem to be still striving for a deal though, so I'm not convinced they really are prepared to go no deal on Brexit. They backed themselves into a corner on both Brexit and the Pandemic, by promising things that can not be delivered. It is their mess to sort, but it won't be them who pay for it sadly.

Back to the thread, shocking incompetence. Part of me is hoping that they would get it right (delaying lockdown). But it is groundhog day. Takes me back to March, when I was hoping we'd have a few more weeks of freedom so we could get football almost finished and I could go on my Easter hols. But in retrospect we acted several weeks too late. And the bitter irony is that we are making it far worse for our economy by delaying rather than protecting it. We will now need two inquiries.


Trying to look for a clip where Johnson turns round to his party in PMQs like it was a pantomime (oh no he didn't) but his gives to some of the gist

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...