Jump to content

Tighter restrictions/ second national lockdown aka circuit breaker?


Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit that

> makes it more unique than all those events cited

> above. Life, as well as politics, is full of ifs,

> buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but from

> the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab project, so no one should

> be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> nationalist, power grab Gov...


Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty opinionated blinkered twats who are too tight to pay the going rate for building work etc and just sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and are totally unaffected by what is going on in poorer areas .

What was the point of giving loads of money to those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120 bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us. All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by the Brussels morons in some sort of division of assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG TIME.

Since being in or out of the EU does not affect you whingeing morons you should shut up!

In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

?1 million homes ?

Oh I see, you're aiming that comment at the little people.


A mere ?1 million is basically a flat in East Dulwich nowadays, isn't it ?


Out of interest UG, what's your perceived value of your house ?

Presumably about 89p, the way you seem to have a grudge against those with only ?1 million.


(accidentally sent the above as a PM. Sorry UG, was meant for all, not yours alone)


uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Exactly BB, it's the predictability of Brexit

> that

> > makes it more unique than all those events

> cited

> > above. Life, as well as politics, is full of

> ifs,

> > buts, maybes, and sliding doors moments, but

> from

> > the beginning Brexit was always a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab project, so no one

> should

> > be surprised we've ended up with a right-wing,

> > nationalist, power grab Gov...

>

> Pig-ignorance of what is/was going on in the rest

> of the country as usual...stupid ignorant lefty

> opinionated blinkered @#$%& who are too tight to

> pay the going rate for building work etc and just

> sit back in their ?1 million terraced houses and

> are totally unaffected by what is going on in

> poorer areas .

> What was the point of giving loads of money to

> those unelected fools in Brussels with their ?120

> bottles of wine and then THEM telling US how to

> spend the money they so 'kindly' give back to us.

> All our infrastructure has been fiddled with by

> the Brussels morons in some sort of division of

> assets across the Eurozone and the UK lost out BIG

> TIME.

> Since being in or out of the EU does not affect

> you whingeing morons you should shut up!

> In the words of Anne Widdecombe- 'We're Off!'

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 2. If there had been no Falklands War there would

> be no Thatcher in 1983 and we would have had the

> experiment of the third way (the SDP)


Interesting list of 'what ifs' but this is one of those truisms that turns out not to be true. A few years ago I looked through detailed polling and voting info from Ipsos MORI for 1981-83 and here's the summary:


1. Labour were not miles ahead in the polls before the Falklands War broke out in April '82. In early '81, at the depths of the recession, they were at least 10% ahead in the polls, but by Dec '81-Feb '82 (two months before the War started), the lead was down to between 0 and 3% and their average poll rating was 31% - barely 3% more than their eventual showing in the '83 general election and less than the 33-36% they were polling from October '82 to Feb '83.


2. The 'Falklands factor' theory ignores the huge impact of the SDP / Alliance on the years from '81 to '83. Between November '81 and the outbreak of the war, the combined Alliance polling was between 30 and 44%, but after this honeymoon period it was the Tories who benefited from a decline in Alliance support rather than Labour. There's no evidence that this had anything to do with Falklands.


3. The economy (in GDP terms) was picking up from the depth of the '80-'81 recession and by early '83 was showing strong growth. Despite their best intentions, many people vote with their wallets and Thatcher benefited from this in '83.


4. Labour did not put up a credible platform for voters outside their core constituencies, without which they couldn't hope to win power.


Now back to the pandemic...

Where to begin?

We're at the stage where Johnson needs to go and we have a Gov of National Unity. The current Tory party is incapable of governing on its own, it's purged what decent experienced politicians it had over Brexit, and we're now left with a cabinet of the all the talentless.

And a reminder that in less than 9 weeks we exit the Brexit transition period, a time set aside for Gov and business to get everything ready for being outside the single market and the economic hit to the economy that will entail on top of the Covid costs, yet business still doesn't know what this 'oven-ready' deal will finally look like. A refusal to extend this period during a global pandemic is tantamount to gross negligence, a complete lack of duty of care to the well-being of this country and it's citizens...

They seem to be still striving for a deal though, so I'm not convinced they really are prepared to go no deal on Brexit. They backed themselves into a corner on both Brexit and the Pandemic, by promising things that can not be delivered. It is their mess to sort, but it won't be them who pay for it sadly.

Back to the thread, shocking incompetence. Part of me is hoping that they would get it right (delaying lockdown). But it is groundhog day. Takes me back to March, when I was hoping we'd have a few more weeks of freedom so we could get football almost finished and I could go on my Easter hols. But in retrospect we acted several weeks too late. And the bitter irony is that we are making it far worse for our economy by delaying rather than protecting it. We will now need two inquiries.


Trying to look for a clip where Johnson turns round to his party in PMQs like it was a pantomime (oh no he didn't) but his gives to some of the gist

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...