Jump to content

Recommended Posts

About 8yrs ago I posted on EDF some pics of something I had found in the Thames, hoping for an answer as to it's purpose and age.

I can't find that post now, so now I'm posting new photos with a question to all - what is this and how old ?


Info:

- made of stone by looks of it

- 10" diameter

- 6" deep

- the square hole in centre is 3 1/4"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/266139-what-is-this-mystery-find/
Share on other sites

When I found it, with one edge sticking out of the mud, I thought it was the edge of a large stoneware jar.

As I dug deeper I realised it was something else and the grooves around the side left me pondering.

I did speculate whether it was some kind of maritime mooring block whereby it slotted over an upright wooden post and rested on the jetty, while ropes were tied around it and eroded the sides in that uneven way (no, DR, there's no helical groove).

I then wondered if it could have been part of a pulley system, but why use stone as a material for a pulley I thought ?

After that, I figured it may be the base of an ancient stone column, where horses/cattle had for an extended period of time been tethered and caused the erosion on the sides.

So I found out what this is by talking with a Thames finds specialist who advised me as follows.

It's a late medieval grindstone. That is, a grindstone for blades such as knifes, axes, swords. It would have been hung on a square timber section which was attached to a turning apparatus to be spun by hand, probably a large handle to the side. It's fine-grain stone, typical of grindstones used then.

How and why it ended-up in the Thames is a point of intrigue, possibly it fell from a jetty or boat, being probably too heavy to be washed around by the river so being found where it fell, in the mud.

Glad to have got this resolved.

I was watching a YT clip by this chap and, during his short about his 10x best Thames stone finds, he holds-up a fragment (about a quarter) of a grindstone similar to mine. I then realised what I probably had found. So I contacted him and he confirmed the find.

I'll talk to MoL and see if they want it to display as part of the Thames finds section, I'll construct the wooden apparatus if they want.

I see no photos or diagrams of grindstones with same features as the one I found, so I'll take the advice for now as it's the best I've had, but I've a nagging doubt it's not the entire story - until I learn more.

It would work for sharpening gouge chisels on the rounded ridges. All the many blade sharpening grindstones I have seen retain a clear 90 degree edge, not the rounded one yours has. I would have thought that it had pulley grooves but the stone looks like it would abrade rope rather than the stone becoming polished by use.
Googling 'ancient stone pulley' doesn't throw up much beyond what the Egyptians used to build the pyramids, which makes sense with the loads they were shifting. For less strenuous lifting work it does seem a lot of effort to make a pulley from a lump of stone when it would've been much easier to do it in timber, which are far more common. I'm starting to think it's more likely to be the base of a decorative column...

Foxy,

Found in the Thames at Rotherhithe, 100m West of the Surrey Docks Farm site.



DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am interested to know where on the Thames it was

> found. ?

>

> North or South Bank. I believe it has something

> to do with business activity,

>

> Part of Lifting gear.. Barge loading... Brewery

> ... Flour Mills .... ??

>

> I Believe it is old.

>

> Foxy

I have contacted the expert again to ask specifically about the grooves (as pointed out by blahblah and ponderwoman) in the edge of the grind stone not resembling other (what seem to be) traditional grindstones used for sharpening blades.

The fact that it's not a stroll finding the answer on the www I find interesting.

Thanks for all replies so far.

  • 7 months later...

I did a lot of web searching at the time as well. I eventually came to the conclusion, which I still hold to, that those grooves/striations most closely resembled images of natural abrasion and erosion by wind or water, as in these examples:

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/weathered-rocks-beach-large-wind-water-yellow-sand-pacific-ocean-surf-51315541.jpg

https://image.slidesharecdn.com/weatheringanderosion-easier-130403080226-phpapp01/95/weathering-erosion-and-deposition3rd4th-grade-teach-1-638.jpg

https://image.slidesharecdn.com/weatheringanderosion-easier-130403080226-phpapp01/95/weathering-erosion-and-deposition3rd4th-grade-teach-24-638.jpg

http://www.passmyexams.co.uk/GCSE/physics/images/weathering_wind.jpg


The Thames is tidal where they were recovered, in't it, so it's fairly easy to imagine gradual wear from particles on or streaming over the river bed. But what did your expert say?


[17/8/21 Nailed it. See attached.]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...