Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the real issue is lack of support for those who want to breastfeed but find it difficult. i respect any woman's choice not to breastfeed - as a previous post said we are just lucky to live somewhere we know our children will be fed one way or another - but i do think it is sad when a woman wants to but has little help and encouragement. After 3 days of searing pain i was about to abandon ship when by chance hubby saw a leaflet for breastfeeding support group, i went to the lady's house that night and got the advice and care i needed. which meant i got to enjoy what for me was something i really wanted to do.


and whilst the "breast is best" might have got a bit extreme here, it is just as horrible the other way around in some places. a friend of mine at the breastfeeding group i ended up at in spain once was made to leave a plane and catch the next one because passengers complained she was breastfeeding her baby!

  • 3 weeks later...

I'll confess I have only skim-read this thread. However, I have a query: do people think it is easier for the dad to be 'involved' with the baby if he can bottle feed it, and therefore bond better with the baby? I ask because my sister, currently pregnant with her 3rd child, feels guilty about bottle feeding 1 and 2 (let's not go there on that) and would like to try breast feeding no. 3. However, she is concerned that her husband, who is keen to be very involved (this being his first and to be only child), will be unable to help with a big part of the baby's early months ie feeding. In addition, she asks how she is supposed to put her feet up and recover (!) and/or tidy, cook, give attention to her other children etc etc if she is constantly feeding the baby. I did say her partner could do the tidying, cooking and of course nappy changing etc but she actually wants to do the house stuff (so that it's done properly as she finds it depressing to live in mess) and also she wants her partner to feel really involved with the baby.


I couldn't really answer this one as despite having exclusively breast fed mine for the first 6 months with no problems after the first painful month or so, I kind of agree that the dad gets shut out a bit. To the extent that I would consider mix feeding if I were to have another. I felt that it was very difficult to give attention to my older child and found being tied down by the feeding (no-one else able to do it) difficult. Of course you can express and then you or someone else can feed the baby, but this is in effect adding an extra feed time (while you express) so not saving time or energy or allowing someone else to look after the baby. I really feel that while the early months with child no.2 were a special time for me and baby (not that I particularly appreciated it as I had a difficult recovery period), and my older child and husband really bonded during that time, my husband did not bond with the baby at all, barely saw it, and 9 months in is still trying to connect with him.


Sorry if this is off- subject.

Fmm - in a way yes. I had a rather rocky start with breast feeding and so introduced the odd bottle of formula at around 2 weeks. Mr JB used to do the evening shift from 7pm to midnight so I could get some sleep and she'd have a bottle or two during this period. I think he really enjoyed his time alone with our daughter and having some input into her feeding schedule. It gave him the confidence to look after her alone from an early age.


At one point though, I did find that he was almost undermining my efforts to reestablish breast feeding. He kept wanting 'to top her up'. No grasp of the supply and demand aspect of breast feeding. I wanted him to say 'keep going you're doing really well' not 'do you think she needs a bottle'. It didn't help that the first time we gave her a bottle she fell asleep and didn't stir for 3 hours (which seemed like eternity at that time).

Medically and ethically, I personally find it a bit of a slippery slope that any mother would feel pressured to change her bfing relationship with an infant by adding formula or expressing milk (some women are not brilliant at expressing milk; it's not as easy as it sounds for everyone!) just to accomodate the father.


Seriously, there's a heap of other stuff that dads can help with to be included and bond with the baby. Possibly one of the most important things that a dad can do, IMHO, is fully to support the mum when Baby is very small. How about making tea/meal for the mother while she feeds the baby? Feed the mother to feed the baby. Also, burping, rocking, strolling with the pram, changing nappies, washing Baby's clothes, cleaning soothers and toys, making Baby's bed, and playing games with Baby. Check out Jackie Silberg's lovely book, "Games to Play with Babies" http://www.amazon.com/Games-Play-Babies-Jackie-Silberg/dp/0876592558 . I think I still have a copy of this, if anyone would like to buy/borrow it. xx

I don't think I would have bf'd beyond a couple of weeks without the complete and total support of Mr Oi, he was essential to making it work. Every day before he left for work he made sure there was a sandwich in the fridge for my lunch, that the house was pretty clean and tidy (he's much better at housework than me!), that I had water and snacks to hand - basically I didn't have to do anything other than feed my baby and sleep when she slept. He made the dinner, did the shopping - everything. I did express and he tried bottle feeding but it wasn't a beautiful father-and-daughter bonding moment, she just gazed vacantly around! So he wasn't bothered, which in retrospect was a mistake, I was able to express fine but we left it too late and by the time I was ready to go out by myself and leave her with him she refused to take a bottle. So, if your sister is able to express I would recommend that. I think the fact that he was breastfed himself, and that's what his sister and most of his friends (all female), meant that it didn't really occur to him that I wouldn't give bfing a go (though if I had decided to stop he would have been fine with that too, I hasten to add).


Basically, he can be as involved as he wants to be, feeding is just one part of it.

i think someone mentioned this before - but having the dad do the 'dream feed' ie at 11pm with expressed milk/formula is a real godsend for many mums. That way they can hit the sack early and catch up on sleep


Also a great way to introduce the baby to the dad and maybe others, freeing up the mum to go out if she wanted to at a later date.


for me it's about freedom and also gently introducing the baby to the dad and other people, so they are not wholly dependent on you. Esp if you plan to go back to work etc.


that may not appeal to many mums... but it did me!

When ds1 was born I held him skin to skin and he bf. shortly after he dud his first poo and the midwife handed him to mr f saying 'the mum is responsible for what goes in and you're responsible for what comes out'


4 children on, inc twins, and that approach has always done us just fine, I would rank our parenting as 50:50

Yes, our approach has also been I feed, Mr P changes. Baby #1 sometimes had a bottle of expressed milk which hubby gave him, but #2 wouldn't take a bottle, and with #3 I can't be bothered expressing so all her milk is directly from me. My kids are all very close to their Dad, I don't think it really makes a difference.

Ha ha, we've always had that input/output arrangement! Seriously though in my experience there are loads of things dad can do f the period of time in which they're exclusively breastfed is so short anyway. I can relate to fmm's experience with baby 2 though. Dad isoften too busy dealing with older child to do all the winding/changing etc. I used to get my OH to take baby 2 out in the sling for a n hour or 2 so I could spend time with my daughter but he did end up not doing as much for him than he did for our daughter. Made no difference long term though, at 13 months he adores daddy, they both do!


Oimissus I think you're spot on about how important a partner's support is, especially in the early days.

Haven't been on here in a while, but just saw -


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Personally I have ... no issue with a mother

> ... being forced to take that

> path for whatever reason.


Are you seriously serious? Fine to be forced down that path for whatever reason? What about incompetent advice and misleading information from health professionals (which forced me down that path... and I am not alone)?


I very much have an issue with that. I know I edited your post to take out the bits about the third world, but if I'm misunderstanding your point here, let me know, because otherwise it looks even more depressing out there than I already thought... (given no one else seems to disagree)

Yes, Cyberia, when you put it like that, it sounds a bit glum. Personally, I was interpreting Otta's context as meaning mothers that have no choice but to formula feed because breast feeding has not worked out for a legitimate reason, whatever that reason may be (not including incompetent advice and misleading information).

I think you are twisting Otta's intention beyond all recognition. I think he means he's okay if a woman doesn't want to or finds that she can't breastfeed (for medical reasons, not working for her family, etc).

I can't see how one can take from his statement that he's happy with women getting poor support and advice. I'm sorry you had such terrible support, and perhaps that's influencing you a bit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would have thought Oru/ Trinco would be noisy… certainly is at mid afternoon. Do let us know when you have been what is was like and where you finally settled on.sure we are all interested  as your requirements are quite specific and good to know or have reviews on places, especially from you with different needs and requirements. Actually, given the numbers involved and as you say a special occasion, assuming £20/30  head, you really should have a chat with Suzanne. Maybe your kids could chip in a bit more as they are working.. You could always provide a cake yourself for after. Her food is special and well cooked.. know what you are getting..!    Italian place is also good as well and would cater for your needs except of  course the toilet aspect which is a steep climb down stairs… even I struggle. Yes, , know you are not a fan of Vietnamese place after tea incident… Owner now does all the cooking and so nice and accommodating but you won’t go there.. Wish she got more support… had a bereavement recently…       
    • Depends on your definition of idiot.  I use the term to describe someone of low intellectual capacity.  But understand that this is now not used as seen to be offensive. In that respect he makes decisions that are good for him, and his close followers.  Whether they are in the interests of the US that is open to debate (in the same way that history will debate all major leaders eg was Thatcher/Reagan good for the UK/US). On line definitions: An idiot is most commonly a term for a stupid, foolish, or senseless person, often used as an insult or to express frustration with someone's silly behavior, but historically it was a clinical term for profound intellectual disability, which is now considered offensive and obsolete. The word comes from Greek roots meaning a "private person" or layman, evolving to signify ignorance and lack of skill before becoming a derogatory label for low mental capacity.  Modern Usage Self-deprecation: Used to describe one's own silly mistakes ("I felt like an idiot when I tripped").  Insult/Exclamation: A very foolish person or someone acting stupidly ("Don't be such an idiot!").  Historical/Obsolete Meaning Medical Classification: Once a technical term for someone with extreme intellectual disability (IQ below 25), a usage now rejected as offensive.  Origin Greek (idiōtēs😞 A private citizen, layman, or someone lacking professional knowledge. Latin (idiota😞 An uneducated or ignorant person.  The notable recent  'idiot' was Johnson who of course played the fool (lovable rogue) but that served him well So ultimately not a good word as it can be used in many ways. Ignorant is another good example - can be stupid, unaware, or simply rude.
    • Are you still needing this?
    • I couldn’t disagree more - Trump is an idiot and he was voted for by a combination of idiots, racists and arrogance  you can complain about weak opponents all you like - but when the alternative is a “strong” thug then the problem is those who favour the thug.  All we face was predicted  - and he doesn’t have widespread support across many parts of America. So that leaves parts of America responsible for this  oh and in the list of things you call him you forgot the bit about being a p(that’s enough! Ed)  Vance might be worse in many ways - but he doesn’t have the “glam” that Trump has. Once Trump is exposed properly or dies, nowhere near as many people will vote for his successor see also his embarrassing fanboy: Farage 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...