Jump to content

Recommended Posts

...at least not for a while. TfL published its priorities for the next decade, and Bakerloo Line isn't on there. DLR extension to Thamesmead, better trains for Jubilee line, more trains and services for the Northern Line, more electric buses, yes - but no tube for SE London. Bugger. Understandable but still...bugger.


http://content.tfl.gov.uk/fc-20200930-supp-agenda-public.pdf

Other interesting things:


The Bakerloo line fleet is 48 years old!


Nearly half of London car trips could be cycled in under 10 minutes. More than a third could be walked in under 25 minutes.


Santander Cycle membership went up 200% this year.


Only a third of tube stations are step free accessible.


20,000 new houses in Thamesmead are possible...if the DLR is extended.


TfL will build 13,400 houses (50% market rate, 50% affordable) in London. If it were allowed to borrow, it could build another 47,000!

The London Mayor Sadiq Khan has decided the Silvertown car tunnel, costing ?2bn, is more valuable than the Bakerloo line extension and Rotherhithe cycl/pedestrian bridge.

So much for fighting global warming with active travel and public transport etc.

To be honest in Southwark the current population is in Peckham and Camberwell - those in OKR are a future population that don't have any say as yet. Yes there was a lot of development along OKR planned but that won't get votes next year.


So electoral politics would say it won't be a priority.

Very disappointing. The tube map on page 20, showing the big white empty space in SE London, pretty much sums it up.


ALso disappointing is the section on buses. Great that they are electifying them but I saw nothing about increasing frequency or rationalisation or improvement of services.


Interesting fact for DKBilly, they want to spen money on more "stabling" fro Elizabeth line; I thught horse drawn trains were a bit old school :-)

Yes that tube map on page 20 very visually answers the question why so many people drive in South East London.


It is so ironic that at a time when we are all being encouraged to ditch the car there is being nothing done to improve public transport. South East London is the land that public transport forgot!!

Rubbish. Public transport is not just the tube. We've got multiple train stations and train lines in and near East Dulwich, tons of buses (inc 24 hour routes), and we're in the borough with one of the lowest rates of car usage in London. If you actually read the submission, you'd see there is plenty being done to improve public transport.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rubbish. Public transport is not just the tube.

> We've got multiple train stations and train lines

> in and near East Dulwich, tons of buses (inc 24

> hour routes), and we're in the borough with one of

> the lowest rates of car usage in London. If you

> actually read the submission, you'd see there is

> plenty being done to improve public transport.


The tube is a big part of public transportation in London. 2 million people used to use it everyday.


But, as you pointed out in your opening gambit, no tube coming this way anyway soon meaning access to one of the most popular methods of getting around the city is limited - more so than any other part of London.



As you quite rightly pointed out..ain't gonna happen chief....bugger indeed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...