Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agree with all of that DR and think you are spot on. He has made a living out of being the political outrider. Without that, who is he? This is Farage being opportunistic again imo. If Trump loses the election tm, that will have a major impact on all sorts of things, not least the EU negotiations and a NI border issues. But Farage is miscalculating if he thinks that all those Tory voters who voted Brexit want the chaos of a no deal. A lot of them are deeply unhappy with the way the Boris and his government try to bypass Parliamentary scrutiny.

While its possible (likely) that Farage is not the man to do it. I do believe there is space in the political landscape for a credible political force which can question the wisdom of locking-down, and offer some viable alternatives which MAY provide a better balance of acceptable risks to society at large.


At the moment all Labour are doing is saying they'd do lockdown too...but quicker, harder and better than the tories apparently.


The consensus view out there seems to be that the only effective tool in combating the virus is 'lockdown' in its various forms...and certainly evidence of the shambolic attempt at track and trace is quite supportive of that being the case.


But nonetheless, the cynic in me has no doubt that the 'science' (and specifically the scientists in question) favours lockdowns, as if you are an epidemiologist and run a multi-factor model on the virus spread - then what's going to make the R in your model go down the easiest?...simple....slashing your assumptions on interactions. And what slashes interactions the most...'lockdown'. But these models (as far as im aware) have no economic drivers or outputs which interact with the virus spread metrics to optimise the best solution across both a medical and economic basis.


The point is that surely there are other discussions to be had than just to shutdown or not shutdown. i.e. instead of the NEU's first reaction being 'schools should close too'.....is there not room for them to call for something like weekly or daily testing of all school-teachers?....(just as many medical staff are tested daily), or PPE for school teachers....they are both expensive suggestions im sure (are unions known for their sensible demands?)...but are they more expensive than the economic impact of shutting down schools? (not to mention the societal impacts)? In anycase...while they might be unworkable ideas (just examples, im not advocating them)...the point is that there must be other ideas which dont seem to be getting much attention in the mainstream as far as I can see....

I worry about schools, and expect the rate and absences of staff and pupils to escalate in coming weeks. No matter how good hygiene and social distancing are, many older kids will mix as soon as they get out of the gates. Unions are clearly stronger and better at representing employees when there is high membership, which is almost universal in teaching. So feels understandable that the union wants to protect their members, one of the highest risk to Covid. That said yes it would be good to look at different models, I don't see teachers working behind screens, like at check-outs and on buses, but there could be a conversation about PPE.

I actually hate lockdown - and that's whilst I have a job that I can work from home and saving money because I'm not going anywhere.


I still feel "cabin fever" (my life actually flashed before me the other day for real) but I can't see any other good option at the moment - once I see a good alternative I'll be the first to support it.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I actually hate lockdown - and that's whilst I

> have a job that I can work from home and saving

> money because I'm not going anywhere.

>

> I still feel "cabin fever" (my life actually

> flashed before me the other day for real) but I

> can't see any other good option at the moment -

> once I see a good alternative I'll be the first to

> support it.



https://www.designboom.com/technology/biovyzr-personal-air-purifying-face-shield-05-03-2020/

"the built-in purifying system filters pathogens, allergens, and pollutants from the air by using N-95 filtration."


WOW - No pollution from the traffic being discussed on other threads too - this is an excellent piece of kit. We'll all be wearing them by Christmas I predict.

I am inclined to agree TheCat. There are different factions opposing lockdown but they are rudderless, with cranks trying to fill the void. Farage is probably gambling on the notion that he can be the sane voice on that side of the fence, pulling people together behind him into some kind of meaningful political consensus.


The other thing to factor in is that this is the first time a global pandemic is being addressed in this way. There is much discussion to be had around the role our stripped back services have played in the decisions made. Fear of overwhelming inadequate health resources etc. There are real opportunities here for genuine change for the better if a sensible debate can be had. But at the moment we are locked into a mindset that has never been the case in past pandemics. We need to understand why that is as much as anything else.

Unless it is fed with clean air, it will not filter out most of the pollution. Nitrogen dioxide is a gas so can't be filtered out, nor removed with reagents like activated charcoal. The particle materials are very fine, less than 10 microns (PM 10) so will go through filters. Masks and face shields would only be good if you can actually see the pollution for example a fire and the occasional visible smoke coming out of a car (normally a sign that the equipment has broken or been tampered with). But very sci fi:


https://geekbloggeruk.wordpress.com/2019/07/14/have-you-seen-the-andromeda-strain/

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless it is fed with clean air, it will not

> filter out most of the pollution. Nitrogen

> dioxide is a gas so can't be filtered out, nor

> removed with reagents like activated charcoal.

> The particle materials are very fine, less than 10

> microns (PM 10) so will go through filters. Masks

> and face shields would only be good if you can

> actually see the pollution for example a fire and

> the occasional visible smoke coming out of a car

> (normally a sign that the equipment has broken or

> been tampered with). But very sci fi:

>

> https://geekbloggeruk.wordpress.com/2019/07/14/hav

> e-you-seen-the-andromeda-strain/


I guess there's a gap in the market for you to develop a face mask with a set of wet-NOx scrubbers then Malumbu:)

In deed, although it is no longer manufactured from urine. I stated that because the petrol (or should I say diesel) heads refer to ad blue as cow or pig wee. It's a distraction from all the other stuff going on. https://www.commercialfuelsolutions.co.uk/is-AdBlue-pig-urine.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...