Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Locked because it's another traffic post. Please don't start new ones -Admin


Yesterday (Friday the 18th) at about 5:40pm an Ambulance with blue lights flashing appeared at the Melbourne Grove/Grove Vale junction, but could not proceed because of the padlocked bollards - it had to do a 5 point turn and go back via East Dulwich Grove and Lordship Lane - it finally reappeared by ED station about 4 minutes later.

This situation could potentially cost somebody's life.

This is exactly why these planters and bollards need to be reviewed as a matter of actual emer(urgency).


Please sign below pettions and contact your local councillor to let them know your feelings on this clearly unfit for purpose road scheme.



Southwark Petition

[moderngov.southwark.gov.uk]



Petition

[chng.it] to sign the petition.


or copy and paste chng.it/k62TTfZD2G


You can also voice your views here

Streetspace East Dulwich : [eastdulwichstreetspace.commonplace.is]


Email your councillors below;

If you are comfortable including your address so they can be assured yours are the views of genuine locals.


[email protected] - new - replaced Richard Livinstone

[email protected] - new role Deputy Cabinet for Low Traffic Southwark

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]


and

[email protected]

[email protected]

If an ambulance driver doesn't know their way around the neighbourhood and drives down a street that doesn't lead where they think it does, then yes, they're going to have to chuck a uey.


When the closures are made permanent, it's easy enough the make the closures in a way that allows emergency vehicles to pass over them. See for example the proposed design for the top of Aynella at the Library.

Meanwhile emergency services were consulted before the schemes were approved.


This is nothing but opportunistic. Similar to FairTgirl on twitter blaming the increased traffic on Thursday on the planters. When in fact there had been a serious road traffic accident and all buses were on diversion.

Having been in an emergency ambulance a couple of times this year, they tend to use Sat Navs to get to destinations.

On one of my journeys the Sat Nav sent them down the back streets of ED and then back onto Lordship Lane. If they had known the route, could have got to the same area in less time by just turning right at a junction instead of turning left.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly that.  From all their communications at the time I just assumed it was something that was going to be done anyway so I just went along with it.  As per Froggy’s suggestion above I just went out to have a look at the readings (for the first time ever!) and it said 000078,231.  That’s for just short of three years.  I’ve no idea how that would translate to an actual bill though.  
    • Thanks both! Unfortunately my mobile doesn't support a charging mat. I will try the place by the station, which is more convenient for me than Forest Hill Road  I'm avoiding Rye Lane as my daughter had a very bad experience at one of the shops there (I think it was a battery replacement and the "new"  battery failed almost immediately. Unfortunately she doesn't live in London and couldn't take it back) and there are so many I don't know which may be ok.
    • No, unlike power meters they can force one on you, whether you want one or not. They did on me, and it's on the stopcock in the pavement outside my house. They can also force you to accept metered charges. 
    • They said you didn’t have a meter even though you did? Utterly bizarre.   I also thought that the water company wasn’t allowed to fit a meter unless you asked for one.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...